Name That Butt
While Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Lopez were blessed with bodacious backsides, this Hollywood star is better known for assets in the front. And now we know why!
While Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Lopez were blessed with bodacious backsides, this Hollywood star is better known for assets in the front. And now we know why!
46.
To #33 Mrs. Kovachs, 4th Grade Teacher
*Grinning* So you feel that my comments where I stated that I
believe there are many roles in Hollywood for people of all shapes
and sizes is "defensive" and that it bothers me? Not at all. And
yes, it is quite possible that I am completely delusional. I'm not
really seeing "fat", old, wrinkly people and curious looking people
on television and in movies since they are not "where it is at in
Hollywood".
Since you consider my criticism for "thin Hollywood starlets like
Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton" to be bothersome to you, I would
point out that 1) I don't consider Paris Hilton to be a Hollywood
starlet; and 2) I don't consider Lindsay Lohan to be a Hollywood
starlet either, regardless of how many films she has been in. Her
acting leaves me banging my head on the theater seat in front of me.
That is simply my opinion. You are welcome to have your own. You can buy their music videos, watch their movies, buy their perfume and be enthralled by their x-rated videos if you choose.
It is my personal opinion that Lohan and Paris are both vapid and
talentless, although they are by no means the only ones I consider to
be so. They are very cute and have great bods, but I doubt that
either one of them will ever push Lionel or Ethyl Barrymore out of
theatrical history books.
And as far as my being "riddled by weight issues", I have to say that
statement sent me into a fit of giggles. Particularly since you can't
see me and have no idea who I am; but I give you an "A" for effort.
Posted at 2:20PM on Nov 28th 2007 by OCD
47. Oh big deal! And, btw, KimK & JLo's rearends are just as FAT and cheesy.... they just never show them this close, and if they do, it's with soft lighting and airbrushing. No one is perfect... and everyone making a rude comment here today I'm sure has a fat ass of their own. I find that the people to attack the hardest, are themselves usually extremely ugly and insecure. Either that, or their 13. And all you 13 year olds, laugh your hineys off now while you can, because soon enough you'll be an old fat loser just like everyone else. We were ALL 13 at one time, now look at us!
Posted at 2:39PM on Nov 28th 2007 by For crying out loud!
48. well, there's another fantasy shot to hell.
Posted at 2:47PM on Nov 28th 2007 by Anon
49. Mrs. Kovachs, 4th grade teacher -
I'm reading your posts and I'm just shaking my head.
IF you are a real 4th grade teacher, please tell me what school so I can make sure my child NEVER goes anywhere near it! You're a real piece of work for someone who is supposed to be a positive influence in the lives of children. Is this what you teach your kids, that it's not OK to be over 98 lbs and that people who believe in the beauty of others, despite looks should zap themselves with a jumper cable?
Shame on you, and I really mean that. Please get a new job and stay away from children. Teachers should always, at the very least, have good character. You do not.
Posted at 2:56PM on Nov 28th 2007 by Shall we send a letter to the Principal?
50. The average person who is not obese will gain 10 or more extra pounds per decade, and it starts in your teens, twenties, thirties, forties, etc. It's called weight creep. You have to eat smaller portions as you age, or up the caloric expenditures. All of the skinny girls from high school were twice my size at my 20th reunion, and I was a solid mid-sized athlete. To my surprise I was by far the slimmest one there, and their willowed limbs had given me a few 'issues' in high school. Some had managed to slim down a little by the 25th reunion. Just a couple or three good strolls a week can add up to 10 - 15 lbs a year, X 10 or X 20, but the main benefit is cardio-vascular health. I see weight creep here in this photo, and it doesn't take much to correct it over time.
Posted at 3:27PM on Nov 28th 2007 by She Must Be Closing in on Thirty.
51. Nice!
Posted at 3:28PM on Nov 28th 2007 by Billy
52. JJ while I can agree with most of your points- to say that a size
8-10 is not normal... wow, I must ask WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
Considering you act like you know so much about healthy eating and
exercising, I would think that you would know that the sizing of your
pants has nothing to do with overall healthiness. Your BMI is what
counts. I myself am a size 8 and my BMI is perfectly healthy. I will
never be a size 2 because I inherited my mother's hips and thighs.
Exercising and eating right can not reduce the size of your bones.
(Also you might want to do some research on cellulite as well- it has
been proven to be genetic issue for some people but I'm sure that's
hard for you to admit.) I do realize that obesity is a problem, but
your unrealistic expectations are downright scary. God help your wife
and any kids you might have.
Posted at 3:51PM on Nov 28th 2007 by A Little Perspective Here
53. ABSOLUTLY BEAUTIFUL! A Hollywood Starlet with an actual figure! No leather skinned fake tan or fried out Yellow hair, simply a natural beauty:). YUMMY!!!
Posted at 4:27PM on Nov 28th 2007 by sandman
54. #48 A Little Perspective Here and #49 Sandman:
Couldnt have said it better myself!
Believe it or not, I am a size 4, but even I can tell the difference between "healthy" and "hollywood". The two are not mutually exclusive.
Love isn't 86 pounds like the rest of hollywood...but that is ONLY where 86 pounders live and work. I give her kudos. She's a normal woman, and there is nothing wrong with that.
Posted at 5:36PM on Nov 28th 2007 by sheesh!
55. #14 Mrs. Kovachs. Are you actually a teacher? May my children never learn from a b!tch like you. I can only imagine how you treat your students. Do you treat the thin ones good and the little fat ones bad?
Posted at 5:28PM on Nov 28th 2007 by mg
56. don't forget the camera adds weight. i don't think the pictures do her justice. there's no way you can have teeny waist like that and be fat. it is funny though how our tolerance for thinness has grown while the majority of us are way too fat. (but not me, i'm a size 4)
Posted at 7:41PM on Nov 28th 2007 by whatever
57. She's still Top 10 on my list hit list...she's adorable and normal. Get over yourselves America & Hollywood!
Posted at 7:12PM on Nov 28th 2007 by SternShowFanVA
58. I am a woman with ample behind, but this is just disgusting...no toning at all and out of proportion with her upper body...call Suzanne Summers for that toner machine she promotes....Have Dr. Jan Adams lipo the hips or something...: )
Posted at 7:43PM on Nov 28th 2007 by candygirl
59. LOVE HER! she's beautiful... natural and glowing and full of positivity
Posted at 2:20AM on Dec 8th 2007 by miss lala
60. Ever noticed when most of these "beautiful" people are taken out of there comfort zone of cameras, stage and make-up, they look pretty normal? So why is many of you lowlife maggots hang on every word with these fools? Hollywood is the lowest form of life and the most stupid.
I can show you five hundred woman with large butts and big boobs at any water park on a summer day and they can probably make asses of themselves, enter rehab, and bad mouth America better than many Hollywood airheads if they set their mind to it.
Posted at 9:02PM on Nov 28th 2007 by Bluto