Celebrity Justice
Dennis Quaid Sues Drug Company

Actor Dennis Quaid and wife Kimberly Buffington have filed suit against Baxter Healthcare Corp., the makers of the drug Heparin.
Click to read the lawsuit!
The couple's newborn twins Zoe Grace and Thomas Boone were mistakenly given a massive overdose of the anti-coagulant drug last month while hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in L.A. The Quaid's attorney says the twins "were very critical for a while," but appear to have recovered and "everything looks good." They filed suit because they want to prevent this from happening to any other children, Loggans said. The suit claims the Baxter is liable and negligent because the packaging of the 10 unit vial of Heparin looks almost exactly as the 10,000-units-per-milliliter vial of the drug.

Three children died in Indiana from a similar mix-up with the drug.

We're told that the Quaids have not sued Cedars ... yet. Just yesterday, Baxter issued a news release outlining the company's new "drug safety initiative" that promises to change the labeling of Heparin vials.

Cedars-Sinai released the following statement:

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center today announced a series of changes it has made in its medication policies and protocols since November 19, as well as immediate additional training of all nursing and pharmacy staff, as the medical center completed its preliminary investigation into a November 18 medication error involving three patients who erroneously received the wrong concentration of heparin (a medication used to prevent blood clotting) to flush their IV catheters.

The medical center's investigation found that preventable errors made by pharmacy and nursing staff caused the wrong concentration of heparin to be used.

A pharmacy technician failed to follow hospital policy of having another pharmacy technician verify the medication and concentration prior to removing it from main pharmacy inventory. As a result, the technician mistakenly retrieved a higher concentration of heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) instead of the lower-concentration heparin (10 units per milliliter) used for flushing IV catheters.

The higher concentration heparin was delivered to the satellite pharmacy that serves the pediatrics unit. A second pharmacy technician, working in the satellite pharmacy, did not verify the concentration of the delivery from the main pharmacy, as required by hospital policy.

As a result, the higher-concentration heparin was placed in a location in the pediatrics unit where the lower-concentration heparin is kept. The nurses who subsequently administered the heparin to the patients also did not follow hospital policy of verifying the correct medication and dose prior to flushing the intravenous site.

The error was identified later that day by Cedars-Sinai staff, who immediately performed blood tests on the patients to measure blood clotting function. In one of the three patients, the clotting tests returned quickly to normal. The other two patients were given protamine sulfate, a drug that reverses the effects of heparin and helps restore blood clotting function to normal. Additional medical tests and clinical evaluation conducted on the two patients found no adverse effects from the heparin or from the temporary abnormal clotting function.

"Although this was a rare event, and attributable to human error, it is also an important opportunity for the entire institution to explore any and all ways we can further improve medication safety," said Michael L. Langberg, M.D., chief medical officer at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

"On behalf of the medical center, I extend my deepest apologies to the families who were affected by this situation, and we will continue to work with them on any concerns or questions they may have. This was a preventable error, involving a failure to follow our standard policies and procedures, and there is no excuse for that to occur at Cedars-Sinai," Langberg said.

"Cedars-Sinai's reputation as a quality and safety leader nationally is due in large part to an organizational culture of continually improving our systems to minimize any chance of human error. Immediately following this incident we began additional focused education on medication safety to augment our regular training, and have implemented additional procedures and protocols for our pharmacy and nursing staff," Langberg said.

Among the actions Cedars-Sinai has taken in response to the incident:


► High-concentration heparin (10,000 units per milliliter) has been further sequestered in all pharmacies.

► Only saline will be used for peripheral IV catheter flush on all pediatric patient-care units. (It was already the practice on adult patient-care units to use only saline for peripheral IV catheter flush.)

► In addition to the existing policy of having designated high-alert medications (such as heparin) checked by two pharmacy staff prior to the medications leaving the main pharmacy, and then checked again by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy, a new step requires a second check by pharmacy staff in the satellite pharmacy before they place high-alert medications in stock on a patient-care unit.

► In addition to these checks on designated high-alert medications by pharmacy staff, nurses will continue the existing policy of separately verifying medication and dose prior to giving high-alert medications to the patient.

► The existing ongoing training for pharmacy and nursing staff on medication safety policies and protocols has been augmented with immediate focused education on high-alert medications, begun Nov. 20, to reinforce the hospital's high-alert medication safety policies and protocols:

Starting on the evening shift of November 20:

● All nurses (approximately 1800) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices, and were required to pass a written test on the material before they could resume caring for any patients.

● All pharmacy staff (approximately 200) were re-trained on high-alert medication policies and practices.

► The individuals involved in this incident were immediately relieved of duty pending investigation, and appropriate disciplinary actions are being taken.

Langberg said that Cedars-Sinai is also continuing to cooperate with regulatory agencies investigating the incident, and that Cedars-Sinai would make additional changes in policies and protocols if indicated by the regulatory agencies or any additional findings by Cedars-Sinai.

Reader Comments

(Page 6 of 15) Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

76. They've found the deepest pockets to go after. The bottles are clearly marked. Heparin....Hep Lock. The nurse is at fault. A nurse is supposed to double check the medication and dose before giving it to the patient. Her fault. Human error. Sue the hospital that hired her. oh wait. The drug company has more money.

Posted at 4:59PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Joanna

77. This is absolutely ridiculous..SUE THE NURSES!!!!

THEY are the ones responsible for "DISPENSING" medication..It is called "Paying attention to what you are doing idiots and have "another nurse".. double check behind a nurse giving that medication to an Infant..There are "hospital protocols" that are suppose to be followed when giving "heparin" or any other major drug to "infants or children"..Get real here!

This is about as stupid as suing the tobbaco industry because you smoked all your life 'at your own risk while reading the warning label on the package"..

Posted at 5:03PM on Dec 4th 2007 by uneed

78. No one's protecting the pharmaceutical companies. Get over your paranoia, Mary.

Posted at 5:00PM on Dec 4th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

79. I had my son at Cedar last year and am sad to think that one of my nurses I love so much might have done this by accident to these babies. The labels are very close in appearance. I just pray that the company will just change the labels and that other babies wont be hurt.

Posted at 5:06PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Michelle

80. Joanna, of course! They want the money. Plus, Cedars is famous and caters to celebs like them. Their lawyer convinced them to go after the drug company strictly for money. What kind of changes could they make by suing the drug company? Um...nothing.

Posted at 5:02PM on Dec 4th 2007 by LarryBirkhead

81. They should be happy that their children are okay and less worried about a mistake someone made.

Posted at 5:11PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Bianca

82. dr quack...paging dr. quack

Posted at 5:09PM on Dec 4th 2007 by damage

83. yeah boy.

Posted at 5:15PM on Dec 4th 2007 by bossman

84. I am very glad the babies are okay..but I am also confused as to why the drug manufacturer is getting sued. It was human error and I am very sure that in hospital meetings it was discussed that care should be taken as the bottles are very close in appearance. One other thing that I feel should be noted it that I do think the Quaids need to be compensated for what happened, I don't believe they should sue for millions as this was something that "just happened"...

Posted at 5:18PM on Dec 4th 2007 by gwen0

85. THERE'S NO EXCUSE FOR SCREWING UP AT HOSPITALS FOR ANY REASON. ANY OF US WOULD DO THE SAME IF IT WERE OUR FAMILIES. THEY SHOULD GET EVERY CENT THEY ASK FOR AND THEN DONATE IT TO MEDICAL CARE FOR FAMILIES THAT CAN'T AFFORD IT.

Posted at 5:28PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Sarah

86. this looks like a put-up job by his lawyer...go for the gusto! more money to be made from drug company than the hospital and/or staff...yes, indeed, this is the lawyer's work at hand plis it's a whole hell of a lot easier than getting an actong gig these days, eh, dennis and gold-digger wife???

Posted at 5:29PM on Dec 4th 2007 by russ

87. to #57 Lissabel : this was not an isolated incident. Dennis Quids children were not the only ones in the hospital who were poisoned. It is only being covered because he is famous.

Posted at 5:32PM on Dec 4th 2007 by DINA

88. The heparin containing 10,000 units should be labled in RED with a RED cap on it.
God bless the twins and may they continue to recover.

Posted at 5:35PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Cheryl

89. Why is this country so darn sue happy? Seriously. Ok your kids were in danger and it was a very traumatic and scary situation, but thankfully they survived. If the drug company is willing to change their procedures and the hospital has properly disciplined all involved parties, why sue? Do you realize that when people sue the drug companies and/or the hospitals, the extra cost gets transferred to the rest of us? When a poor family goes into the hospital with a sick baby and cannot afford all the necessary care, are the Quaids going to help them out? In the medical industry we are all connected so your litigation affects us all and not in a positive way. Let the company fix the problem and then move on. Enjoy your babies.

Posted at 5:47PM on Dec 4th 2007 by Kate

90. THE BOTTLES ARE DIFFERENT!

Sue the nurse and or doctor, certainly they should be able to see the subtle differences in the bottles. For instance the extra three zeroes!!!

Posted at 6:31PM on Dec 4th 2007 by crazylegs

Previous 15 Comments | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments