Shaken, Not Stirred

61. Okay, I haven't ever been prompted to actually comment on TMZ stuff, although I check this site often for my guilty pleasures of reading celebrity stuff. She looks amazing. People, she is 71 YEARS OLD. She also looks like she has had minimal, if any, work done to preserve her in some freakish fashion. I can only hope and pray that I look like this when I am that old. Yes, beauty fades, but that is the point. It changes over time. True beauty is timeless, and in the eye of the beholder. This beholder thinks she looks great, and is always an icon of beauty no matter what age.

Posted at 11:10PM on Dec 12th 2007 by Hmmmmm

62. I see a camel toe in that old photo!!! I Yeah!!! Looks tight!

Posted at 11:30PM on Dec 12th 2007 by BUZZKILL

63. Yes...she and Harry Hamlin had a son together...Harry Hamlin being married to Lisa Renna.....Ursula dah'ling...was the very first COUGARRRRRR!!!!! Harry was verrrrry young...and Ursula was verrrrrrry hot at that time. I'm sure she taught him a lot.

Posted at 11:32PM on Dec 12th 2007 by One More

64. I think she looks very good! I have seen 71 year old women and very few look good.

She probably took good care of herself through the years. She could have tone down the eyeliner and dressed a little bit more elegantly, after all, she is in her seventies.

But...the best thing??? Who cares...she is living life to the fullest.........!

Posted at 1:56AM on Dec 13th 2007 by kat

65. An absolute lady, but very good at her age. Hope she health. This reminds me all the bond girls ever, who do you think is the best? A friend told me there is a vote on tallmeet.

Posted at 3:15AM on Dec 13th 2007 by maggieliu

66. Nice bone structure...but she needs to drop that fur that looks like a dead animal on her shoulders...

Posted at 3:19AM on Dec 13th 2007 by Elina

67. She's beautiful! Good for her for not going the plastics route and aging gracefully!

Posted at 8:43AM on Dec 13th 2007 by Rachet

68. Life's a bitch and then you get old.......and then you die!

Posted at 12:42PM on Dec 13th 2007 by OHNO

69. Thanks #22 for the link, but doesn't anyone else think the pictures are sort of creepy. It's like she's obsessed with her son. It reminds me of the movie "Lover Boy" with Kyra Sedgwick.

Posted at 12:14PM on Dec 13th 2007 by wisegirl

70. She has not aged gracefully

Posted at 5:19PM on Dec 13th 2007 by shir

71. Wow......I would like to look as good as her when I reach 71!!!

Goes to show what a little money, and a lot of TLC care do
for a gal!

Posted at 8:09PM on Dec 13th 2007 by lin

72. Natural beauty-not synthetic superficial beauty-shines through every time.

Posted at 8:12PM on Dec 13th 2007 by Inkling

73. FOE THE DUMMY WHO COMMENTED ON HER "ELBOW WRINKILES"??? HE/SHE SHOULD BE SO LUCKY TO HAVE THEIR ELBOWS BE THE ONLY THING WRINKLED WHEN THEY ARE 71.......SHE IS BEAUTIFUL, AND NATURALLY SO......WE SHOULD ALL BE SO LOVELY WHEN WE'RE THAT AGE!! Randi

Posted at 8:24PM on Dec 13th 2007 by RANDI

74. Gadzooks!! She's absolutely hideous!!! What's wrong with you people who thinks she looks good??? You must be monsterous!

Posted at 8:28PM on Dec 13th 2007 by Loros Saladino

75. Ok I do know for a fact that one bond girl was a man who lived as a woman, or was a transvestite (post op? Pre?) Just let me guess-is it her??? Seriously if any Bond Babe buffs are still alive and online will you please tell me-irony is awsome & wouldn't it be a kick if Ursula is the one!

Posted at 8:41PM on Dec 13th 2007 by Jackie Butler