31. KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CHING !!!!!
C-E-L-I-B-E-R-I-T-Y J-U-S-T-I-C-E IS NO JUSTICE FOR THE REAL VICTIMS - THE DEAD MOTHER'S ORPHANS !!

Posted at 4:40PM on Dec 28th 2007 by barb

32. Ha! 35th, slowpokes!

Posted at 4:55PM on Dec 28th 2007 by cheetoesrmylife

33. Hey Barb.... the kids have a dad, so they're not orphans.


I will usually agree that celebrities get off easy, but in this case it seems like Brandy was actually treated fairly.

Posted at 5:21PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Kristen

34. How is Brandy a murderer? Murder is intentional. Plus, wasn't the dead woman chronic'd out at the time?

Posted at 5:34PM on Dec 28th 2007 by A$$hole-itis

35. Look right here from Reuters today:

http://www.reuters.com/article/peopleNews/idUSN2848843620071228?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

It says that police have ruled out alcohol, drugs, no evidence of using a cell phone or was she distracted.

END OF STORY

Posted at 6:08PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Now quit the accusations

Posted at 6:13PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Now quit the accusations

36. she killed!! she is guilty!!

Posted at 6:40PM on Dec 28th 2007 by kaaaaak

37. its easy for most people to be upset that brandy is off the hook, but reality is if anyone were in an "accident" I don't think anyone could take fault and go to jail you can't avoid something that happens within seconds. Everyone in their own life has said: "I didn't mean to do it was an accident"? if you have then you are human, and shouldn't hold judgment. No one deserves to be punished not like this, if it were paris I think more people would sympathize more.

Posted at 6:41PM on Dec 28th 2007 by e Funk Dancer

38. osted at 6:08PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Now quit the accusations

Posted at 6:13PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Now quit the accusations---SHUT UP!!

Posted at 6:42PM on Dec 28th 2007 by JaimeNTexas

39. it was a mistake!! she didn't want to kill!

Posted at 6:43PM on Dec 28th 2007 by J J

40. Jamie,
Why are you being a B when that is a veritable news story? Did you even bother to read it?

Posted at 6:49PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Sue

41. Don't bother Sue. That girl is probably too lazy to even read a newspaper.

Posted at 6:53PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Tamara

42. 10. why do you people insist it is "celebrity justice" or that she got away with murder? If she didn't cause the accident, or the death for that matter, then why should she be punished for it? are you people braindead or what?

Posted at 3:22PM on Dec 28th 2007 by michelle
********************************
Yeah Michelle, I think these people are braindead.
Listen folks. BRANDY DID NOT CAUSE THE ACCIDENT. THE WOMAN WHO DIED CAUSED IT. GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 7:13PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Brandy did not cause the accident

43. I can't believe how some people on here can be so ignorant and have not one brain. She didnt get away with anything. She has to live with this accident the rest of her life. We shold be supporting her and helping her thru this tragic accident. They found her not at fault so you people have no right to judge her

Posted at 7:30PM on Dec 28th 2007 by nellie

44. Good for you, Miss Norwood.

Posted at 7:43PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Goliano

45. When you rear-end someone it is ALWAYS your fault, regardless of why the rear-ending occurred.

Brandy is guilty of causing the accident, period. Even the newest finding still supports that the accident was caused by her, it just excludes distractions.

Therefore, she should serve time for Vehicular Manslaughter. She IS currently being sued in a civil case for wrongful death. She WILL lose that lawsuit.

Posted at 7:45PM on Dec 28th 2007 by Slevinetwo