While Iowa didn't warm up to Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, our moles say her frigid fashion choices were probably a culprit in her third place finish!
Sources in Team Hilly tell TMZ there has been an ongoing, internal push to get the possible first female president to wear warmer, more feminine colors. We're told the Senator resisted, favoring more mannish blues and grays to convey seriousness, authority -- and by default, coldness. Didn't she learn to avoid navy blue dresses?!
We're told Hillary is now giving in to her camp's fashionistas and adopting warmer hues of red into her wardrobe. So long Janet Reno, hello Heidi Klum -- in her dreams.
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 8 of 8) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8Rags To Riches, well put---
I'd guess you to be a dependent, successful Republican, good for you. David, come out of your dem. bubble
Hillary, maybe next timeNOT
"sorry" Rags To Riches I didn't proof my blog. You're obviously "independent" (what I typed)
TMZ, why can't our keyboards keep up with your site? Not all of us type 5 words a minute. Save your tears Hillary, you'll need them for later. Hey Dem. Congress--no more vacations!!!!! We are paying you to WORK
I'm by no means a fan of Hillary or staunch feminist, but no outlet would even think about questioning the "fashion" choices of male presidential candidates. I mean, can you imagine a discussion of whether Barack Obama's ties were dashing enough or whether John McCain's were well-tailored enough for voters to approve. It is nothing but pure sexism to run such a story. And if any inkling of it is true--that voters are concerned if whether Senator Clinton wears "feminine" shades of colors or skirt suits, we haven't come very far from the 1940s after all. The constant question of whether a woman could be president instead should be whether she can even work at all. Shouldn't she just be in the kitchen?
jennifer nyari.
Since you haven't accepted your precious right to vote, don't voice your opinion!
Also, there's spell check or dictionary to spell correctly.
As women we are seeing in this election (whether you like Clinton or not), the double standard that is demonstrated regarding men and women. It's okay for tears to run down the cheeks of George W. Bush but if Hillary Clinton gets choked up while talking to other females she's perceived as a weak leader. Her clothing looks as decent as the rest of the pack (Democrat and Republican) but the men haven't been criticized.
Some people would rather vote for a pretty "poor boy made rich as a trial lawyer" who gets a $400 hair cut than a woman who has successfully committed her life to service on behalf of women, children and (yes) men, too! I can imagine his clothing would never be criticized!
h82b2nd, your post didn't make ANY sense. You only managed to sound like a city snob and an idiot.
Hillary Clinton is one of the smartest women in the country today. Her husband Bill is the most beloved President I can remember and I am 69 years of age. I can remember several Presidents and it is time for a female to be Commander In Chief don't you think? As far as the clothing she wears, what in the world difference does that make. Will you be insisting that she wear dresses soon?

















