Hillary Now for Change ... Of Clothes

121. I am reminded of Adolf Hitler every time I see/hear her speaking and do not trust her or Bill Clinton at all. Why do they bring Chelsea out like a trained monkey every time they're in trouble by the way?

I will never forget the numerous scandals and crimes of the Clinton administration, the lies and coverups. The final straw was their trashing the White House on their way out at the taxpayer's expense. Watch out everyone because when Hillary loses the next time, she might just revert to her lamp throwing. I thought she was going to do it the other night when she was on TV after she lost in Iowa.

Posted at 11:55PM on Jan 6th 2008 by Nurse Ratchett

122. No need to wake up.
I am not voting for Hillary which means I already have.
All she can do is criticize people. Has no answers for "HOW" she would do it better or differently b/c she doesn't have the answers. Very Negative.

I have not heard of "ONE" thing that she has done for NY as a Senator. She wants to focus on Bill's Presidency and nothing about her time in NY-HUM (THE PRESENT)

As President I have heard her say she wants to tax the rich, get rid of Bushes tax cuts and let the illegals stay. So forget about the one's doing it legally that have been waiting 10 years for legalization. She is for punishing the honest AND the successful for the courage to make something out of nothing.
Wow, that is really encouraging for the one's just getting started and all of the people on the waiting list, not to mention our economy, our security and bringing the enemy here.
She will not make The Presidency just for the mere fact that she's a women. She is not the material that we need for a women President (period) This is a very important election and her ideas are way off. Give her 10 minutes, she'll be flip flopping like Gore. Speaking of which, he seperated himself from the Clintons real quick when he ran for President-HUM

Posted at 12:12AM on Jan 7th 2008 by RagsToRiches

123. ALL POLITICIANS including the most inspiring orators in this election are flip-floppers and there is nothing anybody can do about it until we wise up and do not send hard earned tax dollars to Washington, D.C.

Step into self-mastery, create your own beautiful world, and release adoration of POLITICIANS in both parties but, most importantly, until taxes are abolished protest how your tax dollars are being spent while those in Washington, D.C. get rich!

Posted at 11:01AM on Jan 7th 2008 by Flip-floppers and Monday morning quarterbacks in D.C.

124. Rags to Riches

Get off the soap box already as people don't care how much you hate women or politicians.

Posted at 11:07AM on Jan 7th 2008 by David

125. Hillary

BAD acting!!!!!!!!! I can still hear you yelling

Posted at 9:39AM on Jan 8th 2008 by did not work

126. what now?

A persons "SEX" is not your answer either. Keep trying, you'll get there

Posted at 9:45AM on Jan 8th 2008 by Broad horizons

127. Rags To Riches, well put---
I'd guess you to be a dependent, successful Republican, good for you. David, come out of your dem. bubble
Hillary, maybe next timeNOT

Posted at 9:51AM on Jan 8th 2008 by getbusycongress

128. "sorry" Rags To Riches I didn't proof my blog. You're obviously "independent" (what I typed)
TMZ, why can't our keyboards keep up with your site? Not all of us type 5 words a minute. Save your tears Hillary, you'll need them for later. Hey Dem. Congress--no more vacations!!!!! We are paying you to WORK

Posted at 10:01AM on Jan 8th 2008 by getbusycongress

129. I'm by no means a fan of Hillary or staunch feminist, but no outlet would even think about questioning the "fashion" choices of male presidential candidates. I mean, can you imagine a discussion of whether Barack Obama's ties were dashing enough or whether John McCain's were well-tailored enough for voters to approve. It is nothing but pure sexism to run such a story. And if any inkling of it is true--that voters are concerned if whether Senator Clinton wears "feminine" shades of colors or skirt suits, we haven't come very far from the 1940s after all. The constant question of whether a woman could be president instead should be whether she can even work at all. Shouldn't she just be in the kitchen?

Posted at 3:58PM on Jan 8th 2008 by A Republican Woman

130. jennifer nyari.

Since you haven't accepted your precious right to vote, don't voice your opinion!

Also, there's spell check or dictionary to spell correctly.

Posted at 4:31PM on Jan 8th 2008 by Register to Vote: Don't Complain!

131. As women we are seeing in this election (whether you like Clinton or not), the double standard that is demonstrated regarding men and women. It's okay for tears to run down the cheeks of George W. Bush but if Hillary Clinton gets choked up while talking to other females she's perceived as a weak leader. Her clothing looks as decent as the rest of the pack (Democrat and Republican) but the men haven't been criticized.

Some people would rather vote for a pretty "poor boy made rich as a trial lawyer" who gets a $400 hair cut than a woman who has successfully committed her life to service on behalf of women, children and (yes) men, too! I can imagine his clothing would never be criticized!

Posted at 4:30PM on Jan 8th 2008 by still a double standard

132. h82b2nd, your post didn't make ANY sense. You only managed to sound like a city snob and an idiot.

Posted at 6:14PM on Jan 11th 2008 by LiberalsSuck

133. Hillary Clinton is one of the smartest women in the country today. Her husband Bill is the most beloved President I can remember and I am 69 years of age. I can remember several Presidents and it is time for a female to be Commander In Chief don't you think? As far as the clothing she wears, what in the world difference does that make. Will you be insisting that she wear dresses soon?

Posted at 11:24PM on Jan 12th 2008 by walwansky38