Cedars at Fault for Quaid Twin Drug Mix-Up

A citation has been issued against Cedars-Sinai for a massive medical mix-up that injured three newborns, including the newborn twins of actor Dennis Quaid.

The L.A. Times is reporting the California Department of Public Health found the hospital failed to "adhere to established policies and procedures for safe medication use ... These violations caused, or were likely to cause, serious injury or death to the patients who received the wrong medication."

The twins recovered and are home.

The report also indicates the hospital's practices "created a risk of harm for all hospital patients." According to the report, hospital staff and nurses failed to check labels before they administered the drug to the patients, including the Quaids. They also did not maintain proper records of the medication that was used, even though there were already policies in place to prevent this type of mistake from occurring.

Kathleen Billingsley, deputy director of the Center for Healthcare Quality, tells the Times the public health agency has not yet decided whether to fine Cedars-Sinai for the error.

The Quaid twins were twice given 10,000 units of the blood thinner heparin, when they should have received 10 units. The report indicates two pharmacy technicians mistakenly stocked the cabinet with adult dosages of the drug. The nurses involved told inspectors they could not remember whether they read the label on the heparin vials or not.

The third child who also received the overdose did not require further treatment and was released the next day.

In a written statement to the Times, Cedars chief medical officer Dr. Michael L. Langberg said, "While this is a rare event, we are pleased that the [public health department] shares our view that it is an important opportunity for the entire institution to explore any and all ways we can further improve medication safety." He also said "Each of us is personally responsible for patient safety."

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 3) Previous 15 Comments

31. from this photo he looks like he's on drugs himself HA HA HA HA HA HA DRUGGIE

Posted at 11:57AM on Jan 10th 2008 by your mom fool!!!

32. MAYBE THEY SHOULD JUST SHUT THIS HOSPITAL DOWN ...... EVERY TIME IT'S IN THE NEWS IT'S FOR SOMETHING NEGATIVE !!!

Posted at 12:16PM on Jan 10th 2008 by noitall

33. I was surprise that they sued the drug company and not the HOSPITAL. I feel that the hospital is responsible. Is so crazy because is the Hospital in freaking BEVERLY HILLS and for this to happen there is unbelievable......

Posted at 1:38PM on Jan 10th 2008 by really

34. So much to respond to ---

1. Hep 10 vs hep 10,000: Been there, almost done it. Even though, as other nurses pointed out correctly, it is essential to observe the Five Rights -- med, dose, route, patient, time -- the reality is that humans can and do make errors. A new labelling system for Heparin would be a positive step. Earlier it was reported that the initial error was made when a pharm tech or central supply person delivered the wrong med to the NICU. That still does not excuse the nurse from having misread the label.

2. The health care system: What would work best, in my opinion, would be a two-tiered system. Certain basic stuff could be covered by a modified version of socialized medicine. However, it would have to be called something else, as the term "socialized" is a big hot potato. No one should have to lay awake at night hoping their appendix doesn't burst, because they would be bankrupted by the hospital bill. On the other hand, I would fully expect to pay for my own tummy tuck (unless I lived in Brazil, of course).

3. The insurance industry: I don't know where to start. It is easy to say the whole system needs to be overhauled; however, such statement is so broad and sweeping, that it doesn't really mean anything. What would be the first step? Who would do the overhauling? Would the idea be to remove the profit motive?

4. Dr. Phil: If Britney's discharge orders had already been written and were in her possession, even though she was still on the premises, I don't believe she would have been considered a patient at that point (would someone else please comment -- I'm not sure I'm on solid ground here). As far as HIPPA is concerned, as long as no staff member commented on her status as a patient, I don't believe the hospital could have been held accountable. Having said that, I am amazed that Dr. Phil made any comment at all about her condition. If he had been contacted by the family on her behalf, he could have been considered a provider of care for her, and therefore been ethically bound to not comment.

The bottom line: Patient care that is safe, appropriate and sensitive should be the absolute first priority.

Sorry to have to stay anonymous. Any responses would be welcome. I think this is a good dialog, and not necessarily something I would have expected to find on TMZ!

Posted at 1:36PM on Jan 10th 2008 by Anonymous (sorry)

35. While the hospital is bound to be legally liable the nurse is the one who administered the overdose and is therefore liable for her own actions! What scares me about the other blogs on this site is that there's a nurse admitting she's made mistakes in administering medication too as if it's no big deal!! Hope those poor little babies don't end up brain affected by this travesty, the nurse as well as the hospital should be liable no doubt about it. Perhaps it's just as well Quaid is famous because it's certainly brought to light the failings at this hospital - it's just tragic his poor little twins or any other babies had to suffer at all.

Posted at 6:22PM on Jan 10th 2008 by LISALET

Previous 15 Comments