Prince Von Ahole Wants to Kick K-Fed's Ass!

16. He would have had a great point if Britney wasn't so stupid. I was rooting for her until she became a handful. What is she? 10 year old? For the kids to be in the house of a 26 year old idiot who can't think for herself, they are better with Kevin

Posted at 1:08AM on Jan 18th 2008 by Nicole

17. And what type of job exactly does this goofball Prince have beaides taking care of Zsa Zsa? He has no room to talk. And he shouldn't be bashing K-Fed right now. At least Kevin is acting responsibly these days.

Posted at 11:57AM on Jan 15th 2008 by pattijen

18. Well, i have to agree with him on this one. But let's state the obvious - LOOK WHO'S TALKING!

Posted at 12:07PM on Jan 15th 2008 by Ledbetter1212

19. Britney isn't crazy or on drugs.. She has mental issues........... Give her a break people.......
She can't trust anyone.... Her funds are being depleted.......paying $ 120,000 for k fed's lawyers ---- that is is ironic.. She is paying $ 100,000's of dollars to the man who is using the law to take her kids away.. K- fed needs a job....If kevin really loved his kids he would seek permanent sole custody... then taking care of the lawyer and the kids would be all on him... but he needs britney's money... Even her own body guard lied about her being a drugs to get money........
To everyone around her she is only a PAYCHECK, which is sad......

Posted at 11:59AM on Jan 15th 2008 by lejon

20. I am SICK of hearing about Britney. BTW, who IS this bozo anyway, and why should anyone CARE what he thinks?

Posted at 11:59AM on Jan 15th 2008 by annoyed

21. The prince is 100 percent right about K-Fed the big fat LOSER. He preyed on a vulnerable pop tart who believed she loved him. He is total TRASH.

Posted at 12:00PM on Jan 15th 2008 by sandra

22. Vat ist zis man doin-k here? Heads vill rrroll! Heads vill rrroll! Von Ahole, you fool! Vas ist los?

Posted at 12:01PM on Jan 15th 2008 by Col. Hochstetter

23. Sorry but he is right. As big a mess Britney is, K Fed is the biggest looser in Hollywood.

Posted at 12:07PM on Jan 15th 2008 by Bloody Spears

24. He is right even thou he lives the same life K-Fed does
It is all about the MONEY you see he did not go after Shar Jackson and Custody
she has not wORKED in along time

its all about the MONEY$$$$$$$

DOLLAR DOLLAR BILL YALL!!!

AM I RIGHT

Posted at 12:05PM on Jan 15th 2008 by Butterfly

25. Now, that is a pay-per-view I would watch. I cannot stand the money sucking duet, both men live off women. That would be funny.....Everytime I watch CSI , that fanny pack show, I want then to fanny pack K-Fed.

Posted at 12:06PM on Jan 15th 2008 by Not a K-Fed fan

26. If Britney would get off her insane ass and take care of her own children, K-Fed could go out and party like she does 24/7. This subject has been beat to death. The one thing I really hate is to hear people begging Britney to get help and fight for her children. Can't they see - SHE DOES NOT WANT THESE KIDS, THEY ARE IN HER WAY.

Posted at 1:47PM on Jan 16th 2008 by Pat in Ohio

27. This guy is another candiate for the looney bin. Maybe he and Brit can room together!!!

Posted at 12:10PM on Jan 15th 2008 by OHMYGOSH

28. "Birds of a feather...flock together".....lol

Posted at 12:10PM on Jan 15th 2008 by hummingbird

29. It takes one to know one. He is correct about KFed. Kaplan and KFed have driven a young mother with problems totally crazy. If they cared about the children they would have helped Britney instead they pushed her over the edge.. It started in Sept 07, right before KFed was going to lose HIS support money and go down to the 20k a month child support. His creed with the Kaplan's creed have destroyed their cash cow.

Posted at 12:55PM on Jan 15th 2008 by Jan

30. DON'T ALL THE CLOTHES BRITNEY HAS BEEN WEARING SEEM TO BE SENDING A MESSAGE TO K - FED... THE WEDDING DRESS AND EVEN THE PURPLE TOP AND SHORTS. SHE WAS SEEN WEARING WITH THE PHOTOGRAPHER.. I AM ALMOST CERTAIN SHE WAS PHOTOGRAPHED WITH K - FED BEFORE WEARING THE SAME OUTFIT.... K FED TOTALLY USED THIS WOMAN ALL FOR MONEY....

I READ THAT IN CALIFORNIA IF K FED SOUGHT SOLE LEGAL CUSTODY, HE WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE LEGAL EXPENSES AND CHILD'S EXPENSES HIMSELF.


ON CALIFORNIA LAW:

Sole Custody Orders

1. Exclusive custody ("legal" and "physical") to one parent: An exclusive custody order gives one parent primary physical control of the child, with the right to make decisions regarding the child's residence, health, education and welfare. The noncustodial parent has secondary visitation rights as ordered by the court [Ca Fam §§ 3006 & 3007]

2. Sole Physical Custody: A parent may be granted exclusive physical custody without exclusive legal custody. This means the child resides with and is supervised by one parent, subject to the other parent's visitation rights; but the custodial parent does not have sole decision-making power regarding other matters affecting the child. [Ca Fam § 3007]

3. Sole Legal Custody: Conversely, a parent may be awarded the exclusive right and responsibility to make decisions relating to the child's health, education and welfare; but unless exclusive physical custody is also granted, that parent does not have sole control over the child's residence and supervision. [Ca Fam § 3006]

Posted at 12:41PM on Jan 15th 2008 by lejon