Celebrity Justice
Who the Hell is Sam Lutfi?!

TMZ has confirmed Britney Spears' right hand man, Sam Lutfi, is currently inside the law offices of Mark Vincent Kaplan, K-Daddy's lawyer, where Lufti is facing a barrage of questions about how he injected himself into Britney's life.
Sam Lutfi
Federleezy's legal pitbull is trying to find out if Brit made a deal with the X17 photo agency to hawk pics of her and the kids, even though X17 denies it. But what about Sam? Who's signing that guy's paychecks? And how does he make his jack?!

We're told Lynn Spears, Brit's mom, has no idea where Sam came from and how he got into Britney's life. All those details will come to light very soon. The depo continues ...

Reader Comments

(Page 9 of 9) Previous 15 Comments

121. Britney is Anna Nicole's story - on steroids - if possible. Instead of just one HKS - you've got Sam and Adnan. Instead of 1 baby - you have two - and if she really wants to make another in the middle of this mess? As for her $100 million - she's blowing it so fast. I hate to think of what she's going to be like at 35 - if she makes it that far. As for the paparazzi - you know it's just starting to look like that scene in "I am legend" where those rabid dogs and crazed vicious humanoids are pursuing someone. She's not completely innocent - but she needs help - and unfortunately she's surrounded by people hounding her.

Brit - if you're reading your own press - get yourself out of the country or deep into the backwoods of this country where you're not surrounded by all this crap. Pack away the cell phone. And take some time to ask God for help - and listen.


Posted at 3:54AM on Jan 25th 2008 by MTgirl

122. OH, HOW STUPID.........................
HOW DID HE GET INTO HER LIFE ????? WHAT ?
I GUESS BRITNEY MADE A FRIEND OF HER OWN CHOOSING ! DUH.

SHE NEEDED SOMEONE. K-FED F'D-UP HER LIFE,........ RECALL THAT HE WAS NO WHERE NEAR HER IN THE EARLY PART OF THEIR MARRIAGE ??? AND HE WAS NEVER SEEN WITH THE KIDS ? GAVE HER NO EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ? GAVE HER NO RESPECT ???? I WONDER WHY SHE DUMPED K-FED ??!! HOW QUICKLY PEOPLE FORGET..........! WHAT IS THIS DOUBLE-STANDARD ???????? NOW THE JERK IS A SAINT ?! BRITNEY HAD TO LIVE THRU THAT PLUS CONSTANT CRITICISM AND RIDICULE. SHUT, EVERYONE.........SHUT-----UP-------------------

NOW K-FED IS A "HERO", FOR DRIVING BRITNET CRAZY ,OR WHAT ?
K-FED SCREWED UP HER LIFE, PERIOD-----------SHE WENT WAY DOWNHILL AFTER HE MESSED WITH HER EMOTIONALLY. A YOUNG MOTHER WITH 2 KIDS AND A DORK,ABSENT HUSBAND ! HE OUGHT TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR IT !!!!!!!!!! BUT HE CONTINUES TO SCREW UP HER LIFE AND STRESS HER OUT. SHE WAS LOOKING FOR LOVE, NOT A DISASTER.
INSTEAD, SAM LUFTI IS BEING TREATED LIKE SOME SORT OF CRIMINAL ???? AT LEAST HE'S AROUND FOR HER !! HE'S BETTER THAN K-CRAP.

AND PEOPLE ARE PEEING THEIR PANTS OVER THAT, ????

Posted at 3:16AM on Jan 25th 2008 by LORRI

123. AT LEAST LUFTI DIDN'T DESERT BRITNEY MENTALLY AND EMOTIONALLY DURING TWO BACK TO BACK PREGNANCIES, DISRESPECT HER, DESERT HER AND DIS HER LIKE K-CRAP DID-------------WHO BY THE WAY IS STILL NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR BRITNEY'S DOWNFALL. WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DIVORCED K-CRAP ? SHORT MEMORIES !!!!!!!! THEN SHE LOST HER MIND. IT'S CALLED STRESS OVER FAMILY FALLING APART PEOPLE, GET IT ????

AT LEAST LUFTI IS AROUND FOR HER, SHE PICKED HIM AS A FRIEND ! WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO ASK WHY HE'S IN HER LIFE !? CHRIST, SHE NEEDS SOMEONE !!!! LEAVE IT. HE'S DOING BETTER TO HER THAN K-CRAP.

Posted at 3:17AM on Jan 25th 2008 by LORRI

124. Hey LORRI, have you met KEVIN IS JUST TRYING TO GET MONEY PEOPLE!!!!!. You two have an identical writing style! Have you read any of the info posted lately on mental illness? Might do you some good. By any chance do you hang out over at the DLISTED site? Like to stir everything up for your own enjoyment? You're not very intelligent, are you?

Posted at 4:39AM on Jan 25th 2008 by trash-o-lay

125. 96. The reason Kaplan has received $120,000 from Brit so far in lawyer fees is because he claimed it was her fault for being in noncompliance of court order. Now here is the rub. if it is proven she is mentally ill then she can be declared handicapped and he will be unable to use that as a reason to collect his fees from her. K-Fed might actually have to fork over some money to pay this junkyard dog of a lawyer.

Posted at 8:18PM on Jan 24th 2008 by Elphie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I realize this board is almost extinct, so I'll just quickly address this. I want you to explain what laws back up the following..

"if it is proven she is mentally ill then she can be declared handicapped and he will be unable to use that as a reason to collect his fees from her"

I want to see the CA laws which would remove Britney's obligation to pay legal fees if she were to be considered handicapped. How would it matter considering Britney is earning the $$ she's getting from royalties? She would receive that $$ regardless of a disability. A disability would not effect the money she receives monthly at all.
Oh, and I don't have to prove you wrong. If you say something, you should be able to back it up. You act as if you know the laws. I just want to see which laws you're using to come to that conclusion.

Posted at 5:44AM on Jan 25th 2008 by Lori B

126. I would like TMZ to clarify something I found hilarious... Kaplan wants to know if Britney or Sam are getting paid by X17 for pictures. X17 said no. HOW is that any different than TMZ profiting and let's be honest, Kevin and Kaplan and possibly the commish, over ONLY unflattering pictures of Britney with crude and rude captions???? Because X17 doesn't show so many of those or that they appear to be fair to all celebrities? Even if there were a deal with that agency so what? It's not illegal nor does it negate her standing that other photogs stalk her! Apparently they don't do that to people, hello live feed.
I think Britney should get an evaluation but I do not think it's appropriate for Kevin to not let her babies see her. Why can't HE for once try and help her? Maybe he could meet her with the kids??? People do it all the time. They will have to work together at some point for the kids' sakes. They are so young and despite her issues, she loves them and they need to see her.

Posted at 9:24AM on Jan 25th 2008 by southern girl

127. george...they don't fabricate stories !!!!hahahaha What a moronic comment.

Posted at 9:28AM on Jan 25th 2008 by anonymous

128. southern girl while I agree with everything EXCEPT her seeing the kids,she needs to get evaluated first I don't think she would hurt them and yes they are destroying her but until then it's not going to happen also in the long run the truth about this whole case will come out and karma is a bite...

Posted at 9:39AM on Jan 25th 2008 by anonymous

129. Posted at 1:24AM on Jan 25th 2008 by Elphie: Please reread my earlier statement. The reason given by Kaplan for her picking up his tab wasn't because she was the one with the most money, but because she was in noncompliance and was at fault. If she can not comply due to a handicap, then he can no longer use that as an argument. He can still argue she needs to pick up his bill because she's the one with the money and the court can consider this. PR wise it just doesn't sound as good and wasn't his first choice. This last choice keeps reminding people that K-Fed is a bit of a dead beat.

Having sat through two Fair Housing and anticrimination courses for work, I'm not unfamiliar with the law as you would like to paint me.

***********************************

Well, Elphie, I didn't "paint" you as anything, as I made no comment about you personally. HOwever, you may infer whatever you wish.

The award of $120,000 attorneys fees to K-Fed WAS on the basis that Britney was the party with the greater financial means. It covered the fees for the proceedings up through August -- before Britney's noncompliance with the custody orders were issued. The next application, whenever that may be filed, will probably raise the issue of the expenses caused by her refusal to abide by the court's orders and conditions on visitation, the need to schedule and pay for multiple depositions, as well as the emergency hearing that she requested, only to bolt before entering the courtroom to give testimony about her meltdown on January 3. It could be a very risky legal strategy to argue mental illness is her defense for noncompliance, because that would pretty much seal the deal for her not to have any sort of contact with her children, but then again, Trope & Trope might take that tack in their exercise of judgment. In any event, I doubt the "I was incapable of complying" defense would have any impact on the court vis-a-vis its orders granting attorneys fees because California law pretty much ties the commissioner's hands by basing such an award on a means test, and let's face it, Britney has the financial means with her self-reported monthly income nearing three-quarters of a million. Also, while the court might be sympathetic that Britney's mental condition contributed to or caused her to be noncompliant, the court would also be mindful that K-Fed nevertheless was put through great expense to seek enforcement. In the end, a defense that Britney was incapable of complying might relieve her of sanctions for her conduct, but it is not going be successful against an award of attorney fees.

Posted at 9:51PM on Jan 25th 2008 by JurisD

130. Nice one thanks the for the good info

Posted at 6:55PM on Feb 6th 2008 by WhiteFox

131. There are always creeps,bullies,people with a bad guy rep,or with a story,or history, etc, etc who are more than willing to take advantage of someone weak. Its the rule of the jungle,or so it is said.

In this case his name is Sam.Sam,Sam,Sam. someone needs to take you out for a hotdog and a coke.Have a nice one.

Posted at 10:32PM on Feb 6th 2008 by Gump

132. Thanks for the good post very interesting

Posted at 10:17AM on Mar 13th 2008 by RockPort

133. Sam Lutfi's my cousin :)

Posted at 7:22PM on Mar 14th 2008 by Kat

134. Someday I hope to understand the cruel nature of people. Britney Spears is an entertainer and an artist. She possesses genuine talent and enough of it to bring her great success. In doing so she has never been malicious or hateful. Most who have rose to fame are subjected to the capricious attitude of the public. If someone does something that is not to your taste and if your not being forced to watch what they do or how they behave then turn your attention to those things that do not engender in you oppressive negativity. Please examine why you are driven to be so cruel. Most of all be thankful that every last detail of your personal life is not scrutinized by the public. I genuinely wish Britney the best and hope that she can figure her way through this confusing world. Reality is what you make of it.

Posted at 1:15AM on Apr 16th 2008 by Gord723

Previous 15 Comments