Mount Rushmore ... 
and the Rolling Stones.
One of them represents over 150 years of history.
We're just sayin'!
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 4 of 5) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 CommentsThey're gross and always have been. Especially Jagger. But why, oh why can't Keith get better false teeth that fit??? God knows he can afford it.
I laughed my ass off at this one. You guys at TMZ are awesome!
In the world of rock music, these fossils were ancient 20 years ago. I hear that they are soon launching the Depends tour.
What TMZ no Brit Brit today? I expect more from the "Online National Enquirer" that IS TMZ. And by the way, The Rolling Stones haven't been fooling anyone for 45 years. Jealous much?
You young, twentysomething yahoos on here today don't have a clue as to what music is. I remember (and I am only IN my early 40's) when `bands' actually played instruments and didn't steal (`sample') other peoples hard work to make them famous. The Stones EARNED their fame and infamy because they are and always will the the "World's Greatest Rock and Roll Band."
Hey isn't Harvey Levin their age too? He sure looks like he is on TV
I was laughing soooo hard when I saw the comparison between Mt. Rushmore and The Rolling Stones! Whomever thought of this was frickin' brilliant!!! Scary resemblance, but I do think Mt. Rushmore has aged better!

















