Britney at the Dance Studio -- Again

166. Ma & Pa Spears exploits is Sam or his family so everybody just ignore him. He's mad because his access to the money has been cut off & Britneys not out running the streets so he can sell more pictures.

Posted at 12:30AM on Feb 10th 2008 by Charlotte

167. Charlotte...

Wrong, in fact I have no idea if Sam was taking advantage of her financially or not, but I'm sure if he was, then evidence will come to light of it, but I don't convict people before that happens, and nor should you. As judges tell juries, "speculation should play no part in your deliberations". There is a reason for the laws governing human rights in your country and you ought to respect them.

So, no, not sam's family, just someone able to think for myself who doesn't buy everything ma & pa are trying to sell and and I don't like people who exploit their kids, though I see you seem to approve of it.

How can you possibly think that a guy who blew all of Brit's mickey mouse club money and had to file for family bankruptcy, should be allowed to handle her finances again???

Posted at 12:48AM on Feb 10th 2008 by Ma & Pa Spears exploit kids

168. I read on @yahoo.com that Britney Spears hired Lindsay Lohan's bodyguard.

Posted at 1:48AM on Feb 10th 2008 by George William Gockel

169. you'r right #184 and it's sad

Posted at 1:56AM on Feb 10th 2008 by db

170. Damn straight she should be working. KFED needs $30,000/month, her mom is unemployed, her dad makes $50,000/year, Kaplan has $200,000 in legal bills as do all the other attorneys and now doctor bills her parents racked up. No one around her works and brings in substantial money. She gives good meaning "work horse" Stay with it Britney, we are proud of you!

Posted at 2:37AM on Feb 10th 2008 by lal

171. this is mostley a FAKE blog
trying too hard to make a point,all by the same person,ingrid,ma & pa spears exploit kids...

Posted at 2:58AM on Feb 10th 2008 by toohard

172. To: vkndtr; Your comment was great and so on the money but yet so funny.LOL

Posted at 3:22AM on Feb 10th 2008 by My Opinion

173. To: Jack 54 or NYC Girl: My post did not say all people and all situations...you said that. Read the post again. My post said many women and similar hardships. Nothing was ever mentioned about Stepfordville...you said that so we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Posted at 3:59AM on Feb 10th 2008 by My Opinion

174. To Opinion: Are you drunk?

Posted at 6:11AM on Feb 10th 2008 by NYC Girl

175. Her own hair has got to look better than that weave by now! That weave is a crime and whoever is doing it needs their liscense taken away...........it looks like dreads!

Posted at 10:28PM on Feb 10th 2008 by sherie

176.

SHE'S
A
DRUGGIE
WHO'S
BEEN
RUNNING
AMOK,
PLAIN
AND
SIMPLE.
DON'T
LET
HER
DRIVE
ANYMORE --
SHE'LL
KILL
SOMEONE
AND
NOT
GIVE
A
RAT'S
AZZ.

Posted at 7:56AM on Feb 10th 2008 by WAITIN' FOR THE BIG AUTO CRASH.

177. SHe needs to get back into her real life and stay busy, Its helps keep your mind good.

Posted at 9:12AM on Feb 10th 2008 by sandkay

178. To whoever wrote the term "fresh-out-the-psych-ward popwreck" underneath the photo, I am going to go out on a long limb and wish the kind of troubles she has on you or one of your loved ones. This site disgusts me anymore.

Posted at 9:49AM on Feb 10th 2008 by ike Warren

179. I really think that someone should be helping Britney instead of thinking how much money they can make off her and the problems she is having. I really believe if someone doesnt help her, she is going to be the next one to die like so many others who died too young. Get off your lazy asses MOM and DAD and help your daughter.

Posted at 6:47PM on Feb 10th 2008 by AMZI

180.
I beg to differ.

I have read the entire Rolling Stone article “The Tragedy of Britney Spears.” I would like to point out that 174# is incorrect – the article it is NOT as he/she described an “expose on those greedy hillbillies.”

The online excerpt recounts a disquieting shopping trip at the Westfield Topanga mall and concludes with Spears nasty encounter with a polite young woman who asks for a photograph:

"Um, I'm from the South too," she mumbles, "and I was wondering if I could get a picture with you for my little sister."

Britney turns to Ghalib and grabs his arm. "I don't want her talking to me!" she screams. She whirls around and stares the girl deep in the eyes, her lips almost vibrating with anger. "I don't know who you think I am, bitch," she snarls, "but I'm not that person."

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/18310562/the_tragedy_of_britney_spears

According to Radar Online, while TMZ founder Harvey Levin was speaking at New York University's Journalism, he was questioned on journalism ethics and responded:

"It's a huge issue, especially with Britney Spears. Her parents are seriously worried that they're going to have to call the coroner soon. And those aren't my words. She has multiple personalities.... It's outrageous that they [U.C.L.A.] would let her go. The paparazzi haven't helped her. We give our cameramen explicit instructions. They're not allowed to chase, break the law, or go on private property."

Now I have a question:

When Levin states she has “multiple personalities” – is he talking figuratively or literally? If he meant the statement literally, does he have an unimpeachable source?

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/02/tmz-goes-to-jschool.php

Posted at 12:53PM on Feb 10th 2008 by StyleMaven