Celebrity Justice
Yoko to Rocker -- Ono You Can't Use Your Name!

A hard-working heavy-metal-rocker is in danger of losing her musical identity -- all because Yoko Ono wants to bring a silver hammer down on her for using the name Lennon.
Click to launch!
Lennon Murphy, a singer-songwriter whose band is called Lennon, has been sued by Yoko for "tarnishment" of her widow's name and for "fraudulently" registering the name as a trademark.

Ono, claims in court papers that Murphy is (intentionally) exploiting the name and confusing people by using it -- and wants her trademark canceled.

Murphy shoots back on her MySpace page that Yoko and her lawyer were asked back in 2000 about using the name for her debut CD on Arista Records, and they didn't object. Lennon (the band) has since been dropped by Arista, but continues to record. "If Yoko prevails," writes Lennon Murphy, "Lennon might never be able to tour or release records using the name Lennon."

Reader Comments

(Page 13 of 14) Previous 15 Comments | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

181. Give Yoko a break....she's never done anything but try to keep the wonderful legacy of John alive...why are people so anxious to condemn her?, Why can't this Lennon Murphy copyright her "Full Name" Lennon Murphy....Its obvious she is trying to move in and exploit the wonderful John Lennon Name and all that he has done In art, Music, polotics and love for mankind...Yeah Yoko and long live the John and Yoko Legacy!

Posted at 10:52AM on Feb 12th 2008 by Joe Erickson

182. She is almost as bad as Buddy Holly's widow. Greed, greed, greed.

Posted at 11:59AM on Feb 12th 2008 by ss794

183. Never been a fan of Yoko Ono and never will be but John Lennon saw something in her and obviously loved her. The artistic world lost much when he was murdered and he was a much more prolific writer than Paul McCartney could ever hope to be. However, to sue over a name? I think Ono lives for the spotlight. The way she treated Julian Lennon was just disgusting. That he had to fight for a piece of his fathers legacy was shameful. Yoko, respect John's legacy and remember him for the visionary he was. sueing because someone has or uses the name Lennon is childish.

Posted at 10:25AM on Feb 12th 2008 by completely disgusted

184. I hate it when stars get too egotistical and nasty. Really, Lennon isn't Yoko's name, is it? She's Yoko Ono. Don't believe she ever took Lennon as her legal last name. And for heaven's sake, NO ONE will mistake the band, Lennon, with the late, great John. If it's the gal's real name, be fair and let her use HER OWN NAME for her band. Don't be so freakin hoggy, Yoko.

Posted at 12:18PM on Feb 12th 2008 by Louisdpdl

185. WTF if anything it is bringing credit and attention back to the name. They are both talented who cares! Give it a rest Yoko. Give someone else a chance, peace wasn't that John's moto!!

Posted at 11:36AM on Feb 12th 2008 by amkitty

186. #6 - Cat: It's (Vladimir) LENIN, not LENNON for the deceased Soviet Communist leader....Of course because you are american you wouldn't know that. Go back to school.

Posted at 1:17PM on Feb 12th 2008 by Thorn

187. give the woman a break will ya all,wots the matter with all you haters,LET IT BE....ITS WOTEVE GETS U THROUGH THE NIGHT.....SOME HAVE TO TWIST AND SHOUT...SOME JUST WANT TO HELP!!!!

Posted at 4:47PM on Feb 12th 2008 by peace&light

188. Ironic how Yoko isn't suing her own son, Sean Lennon or making music under that name.
If anything I thing Sean Lennon causes MUCH more confusion than just Lennon, being that there is relation between sean, and john, and they sound so much alike...... in fact, since Lennon Murphy does in fact hold the TM on Lennon, I think that SHE should sue Sean. because of the confusion he causes toward her record sales, and then maybe Sean can sue the Lennon sisters. and this can go on for years so that we ALL have something to talk about. This is absolutely ridiculous. If Yoko wanted the trademark she should have gotten in the last 23 years that she had the option. You cannot decide after someone has it, that you want it, thats childish, and not what this country is about. It is even more appalling to read yoko to be a citizen of Japan, fully willing to utilize our court system, and her money to muscle people out of their birth given names. But not willing to become a citizen on the home she has had for the past 30 years? This whole situation is deplorable, she ruined the beatles, has done more damage to John's name than anyone else could conceive, and its time for her to go back.

Posted at 5:25PM on Feb 12th 2008 by Jacob

189. ANYWAY WHO REALLY GIVES A S.... MR LEDGEND HIMSELF IS NO LONGER WITH US.IF HE WAS HERE NOW HE WUD TELL YU ALL TO SHUT THE F... UP.LENNON MADE A DIFFERENCE AND ALSO LOVIN THAT LITTLE CRAZY WOMAN OF HIS SO SHOW SOME RESPECT TO MY FELLOW SCOUSE

Posted at 5:09PM on Feb 12th 2008 by peace&light from scouselandl

190. Yoko Ono needs to drop dead...No one cares about her or her stuid idea that someone is ripping off John lennons last name. Yoko needs to understand that She does not own the name Lennon. Furthermore the lead singer of Lennon Freaking name in LENNON..

Posted at 5:27PM on Feb 12th 2008 by kandi

191. MR J HIMSELF WILL B SITTIN BACK ON HIS FLUFFED UP CLOUD WONDERING WOT ALL THE FUS IS ABOUT AND WHY NOBODY EVE MENTIONS OR WANTS TO FIGHT OVA HIS MIDDLE NAME

Posted at 6:06PM on Feb 12th 2008 by peace&light

192. I have been reading through some of the comments made here, being a fan of the artist Lennon as well as the person Lennon Murphy (who I have met many times at shows, and she has shown herself to be a wonderful human being as well as a gifted musical artist).

some comments I have:

1. Saying that Lennon Murphy would hold the trademark on the name "Lennon" and all forms of it should check out the musical scene. If this is true, who holds the trademark for the work "Pink", the artist "Pink" (aka, Alecia Moore, going by a nickname), able to sue the band "Pink Floyd" or block the trademark of their name (or vice versa) because of the confusion it creates? Or does Ms. Moore has control over any use the word "Pink" through her trademark, in all forms, as a musical artist?

2. As a musician, what name did John Lennon use? I believe he went through a band named "The Beatles". Since his death, albums have been released through the use of his name....his name of "John Lennon". Not "Lennon".

3. Anyone making a person attack on any individual in the name of John Lennon should really look at themselves in the mirror and go "I am a hypocrite". Plain and simple. If you look at the legacy of John Lennon and what he is known for, you find a man dedicated to peace and understanding.

4. To state that the artist Lennon has tried to make a quick buck or gain fame by confusing her name with John Lennon is also sorely mistaken and very short sighted. She has fought for where she is right now. She left her record label, Arista Records, due to their desire for her to pursue a musical direction she did not want to. Instead, she worked on developing her own label and producing her albums independently so she had the musical control. If you see this as taking an easy road to fame and fortune, then there is something to be said for your viewpoints on the world.

I view this lawsuit as something that is frivolous and an attempt either by a lawyer to gain more money or someone to gain a total monopoly on a word. If Yoko Ono is able to trademark the name "Lennon" in all forms, then Julian Lennon AND Sean Lennon should be very worried that if they ever make her mad, they would lose their musical careers. Additionally, it could create a slippery slope when it comes to titles. No longer would bands be able to emulate a favorite artist or use a nickname, for fear of "infringing" on the copy write or trademark of another. In fact, if Pink Floyd or Pink wanted to, they could block the other from ever using their name again. Creed and Creedence Clearwater Revival should be in court over the use of the word "Creed". The list would go on and on.

This is just my thoughts. Agree or disagree as you will. But truly, as you read about how this story unfolds, look beyond it simply being "Yoko Ono" vs. "Lennon Murphy". Think instead of what ramifications it could have depending on how it unfolds. Not just for these two individuals, but for anyone who performs under a name (whether their given name, taken name, or the name of someone they once had relations with) in the future.

Posted at 6:40PM on Feb 12th 2008 by Dave

193. hey am with u all the way dave.let the girl be who she "lennon murphy"......mr j am sure is watching this space..fight on murphy good luck.....LET IT BE!!!!!

Posted at 7:03PM on Feb 12th 2008 by peace&light

194. This is her name!!! Everybody knows it's not associated with John or Yoko or Julian or Sean. It's HER! Yoko is just perpetuating and heaping fuel on a negative image so many have of her!

Posted at 1:03PM on Feb 13th 2008 by John Steinbach

195. lennon is her given name since birth. yoko can't make her change her name. what yoko is doing right now is making lennon murphy more famous by the minute. great job yoko-keep it up-i'm sure lennon murphy appreciates the free advertising. who cares about yoko anyway, no one listens to that old hag.

Posted at 10:49PM on Feb 12th 2008 by lennonmurphyrocks

Previous 15 Comments | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments