Celebrity Justice
Britney Could See Young'uns Soon

TMZ has learned lawyers at today's custody hearing are hashing out a plan so Britney can see her babies again. But there's a snag.

We're told both sides are in agreement -- Britney should get visitation rights in a therapeutic setting. But sources say the lawyers are meeting right now and can't agree on the terms.

We know K-Fed wants Brit to have visitation back. In all probability, a psychiatrist will supervise visitation. TMZ has reported that people involved in the conservatorship would also like to find a private facility where Brit can receive treatment for her bipolar disorder.

Brit hasn't seen her kids for a month and a half.

Will the attorneys reach an agreement today? Stay tuned ...



Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Britney Spears

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 5)Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. #36 are you real---You are an idiotic moron.

Posted at 3:15PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Yep

47. I think it's good that daddy has her flashing herself again. Sam put a stop to that and he shouldn't have, the publicity is good for her. And so what if the guy needs a drink. Lots of alcoholics can stop after 1 or 2...no biggy.

Posted at 3:17PM on Feb 19th 2008 by John

48. I love how Jamie was drinking a soda at a deli and now he was "drinking in a bar." I think X17 started that rumor, no?

Posted at 3:18PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Someone Who Knows

49. In that pic her kids aren't strapped in. they have the straps over their heads but they aren't buckled. someone needs to look into that. She is an aweful mother.

Posted at 3:19PM on Feb 19th 2008 by NemesisB4

50. Someone who knows...it's not a rumor, X17 has the video...and he's definitely sitting at a well stocked bar...but who cares? The guy deserves to have a couple.

Posted at 3:20PM on Feb 19th 2008 by John

51. Kevin doesn't have a problem with Brit seeing the boys, however, I don't blame him for asking her to go to a private facility in order to get better. The first and foremost responsibility is the safety of these two little boys. Yes, it should be supervised and if anything out of the normal happens, then visitation should be suspended again. There should be guidelines with the visitation and it is important that ALL parties involved to be in agreement with each other. For all we know, maybe they are in disagreement as to how many days aweek or for how long she should be able to see them for. I think some are reading more into this then what may be going on. I don't think that her dad is against Brit seeing the boys, but I am sure that there is concern on his part as well. According to what Lynn stated last week or so, that Brit knew of the boys but seem to think that they are like toys. Who knows how she will react when she first sees them and vice versa. I don't think she will ever regain 50/50 custody though, only visitation. And to those who seem to think that she is back, I don't think that if she ever has a "come back", that she will ever be like how she was before. She isn't "back", she is just merely venturing toward acting "normal" to some degree, but really, for how long? Just because she may be able to visit with her kids, does not mean that she is cured and can continue on with life as if the last several months never happen. You don't get well that quickly and your problems just don't disappear over night. They all need to take baby steps to see where this all leads. She may be saying that she wants to see them (and probably does), however, if she is not there "mental wise", will she know how to talk and interact with them? Will she be able to handle the crying? Who knows, and that may just be what the lawyers and all are trying to figure out.

Posted at 3:32PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Gabrielle

52. Oh yes, he definitely deserves his drink. LOL

Posted at 3:33PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Someone Who Knows

53. Being a spoiled, selfish, histrionic whore ≠ "bipolar disorder".

If you don't know what ≠ means, click the following link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_mathematical_symbols

Posted at 3:33PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Cynic

54. They are flesh colored panties, hence the smile on her face. That's a good one Britney! Get them at their own game. Of course she desrves to be with her boys! Slimfed already is tired of them, they cramp his slimey style! Still praying for you Britney, and wish you the very best.

Posted at 3:34PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Kayla

55. I think K-Fed's public statement that he wants Brit to share the kids is just a PR stunt cooked up by his oily attorney, Kaplan.

Kaplan is charging $500,000 -- half a million bucks!! -- for just a FEW months work on this case. Just what does he do for this money? Now he's assured a lot more of Brit's money, too, dragging everything out. He also provides PR for K-fed too--make him look like a good daddy. What b.s. AND--Kaplan gets a publicity for HIS LAW FIRM, TOO!!

Britney has provided K-fed with an estate in Tarzana. An on site recording studio. A nanny (or is it two?) so he can....work?? A personal assistant (for what??) Bodyguards. Fancy cars. And how much time does HE spend with those boys?? SHE foots the bill for HIS oily attorney. He has FAME now having been married to Britney. EVERYTHING K-FED HAS HE OWES TO BRITNEY!! HE WAS A LOUSY HUSBAND AND HE NEVER PAID ATTENTION TO HIS KIDS. THAT'S WHY BRIT DIVORCED HIM!!!! HE WAS OUT DRINKING AND DOPING WITH HIS PALS!!!!

Don't believe for a minute K-Fed is a good dad. His lawyers just keep him behind locked doors, so people THINK he's a good, non-doping dad. K-FED AND KAPLAN ARE BOTH IN IT FOR THE MONEY!

Posted at 3:35PM on Feb 19th 2008 by bev

56. Frankly, if you have 4 kids yourself and you are spending your time
on this site posting away about how mothers should have their
children taken from them because you don't like the accent their mom
uses, is much crazier than someone heading out to Riteaid at midnight
in my opinion. Maybe you should ask your husband to take your kids
away now, seems you don't appreciate them anyhow if you are on here.

Really, do you think your average person on the street thinks its
crazier to go to a riteaid at midnite or for a mother of 4 to be
spending time posting rubbish like you are to a gossip site...ask
your friends, see what they think? Sounds like a pretty messed up way for a
mom of 4 to be spending her time to me.

Posted at 3:03PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Are you real?

HAHA-your funny!! Not that its any of your business but my 4 kids are at school, so I can do what I please numnuts. My children come 1st, as most good parents would tell you, so yes, if I started loosing my mind and showing my privates around town and speaking strange, I would hope my husband would spare my children my crazy antics! Children need to be raised by STABLE parents.

Posted at 3:43PM on Feb 19th 2008 by chrissybot

57. Down here in the good Ol" state of Louisiana, it's spelled Young'ns. Get your spelling right, before you critize us! Hopefully Britney can get visitation with here kids. I am praying for you Brit.!

Posted at 4:31PM on Feb 19th 2008 by suzie hoffman

58. I thought it was "young-uns." As in young ones?

Posted at 4:38PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Spelling Error?

59. am I the only one that noticed that little SP's carseat buckle isn't buckled??? you can clearly see the metal piece that isn't latched!!!

Posted at 4:56PM on Feb 19th 2008 by jdooooooooooo

60. jdooooo, you may be right. It's a little hard to tell 100% but it does look to be unbuckled. Sorry to say, I'm not suprised.

Posted at 5:05PM on Feb 19th 2008 by chrissybot

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips

Email Alerts