Fashion
Britney's Latest Vadge of Honor

Britney -- and her kitten -- re-appeared last night at Sushi House Unico in Los Angeles. The conservatorship does not, apparently, require undergarments!
Britney Spears
Britney is officially back.

Filed under: Paparazzi Photo, Britney Spears, Full Throttle Fashion

Reader Comments

(Page 5 of 12)Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

61. Britney is again acting like trash.
Her career is gone in a flash.
She loves the spotlight
and goes out every night
to let the paps catch a view of her snatch!

Posted at 2:00PM on Feb 19th 2008 by 5 cent

62. The original pic is found here: http://storage.infdaily.com/560802.jpg Looks like pink underwear to me and the weird mark on her wrist is the pink lips tattoo...

She's still a disgusting mess, though.

Posted at 2:06PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Opinionated

63. The problem with people is that they thrive on seeing the goods of Britney Spears, only to be disappointed and mentally challenged after they look at that disturbing picture of her without her underwear. Maybe she has a yeast infection, maybe an STD. If it was an STD, she could be the proud spokesperson for Valtrex.
I mentioned this earlier, people really think she is sane, this is all an act. Like Lindsay Ho-han, Britney loves it when the cameras are there, and give her the coverage she wants. TMZ shouldn't cater to this b.s., I know our readers @ thedailybs.com don't. We belittle these people because they think it's OK to do whatever they want, because they have money. You can't stop public opinions, these tramps are screwed up in the head. Perez Hilton seems to think she's fine, I don't.
Point is, people love these pictures, just like Ho-han's mockery of Marilyn Monroe. Harvey, I'm disappointed in you, man.
If you look at the picture, it appears she looks pregnant. Maybe she'll make a guest appearance on "Maury" with Maury Povich telling the audience, "ALF, you are the father." I can see ALF's reaction, "Ha!"

Posted at 2:14PM on Feb 19th 2008 by S.M. Krause

64. #59, er Sam, you kept her too doped up to flash people. Oh, wait. She was flashing people like, er, a crazy woman, drugs and all. Prolly her parents give more of a shiznit about her than O-Sam-a ever could.

Posted at 2:14PM on Feb 19th 2008 by whatever

65. First of all if people have seen the real pictures you can't even see anything. I've seen pictures that are closer up and she is indeed wearing underwear.

Posted at 2:15PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Daniel

66. Idiots like you haven't seen her wrist tattoo before.

Posted at 2:16PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Daniel

67. #5, Britney could have $100 billion and she wouldn't buy panties. She's a slut that likes to show off her naked crotch to try to get all the men and paparazzi to follow her around like a dog in heat. She'd be doing pornography if she had her way, or turning tricks on Hollywood Boulevard. She's just plain nasty. How come she doesn't get arrested for indecent exposure? Oh I forgot, the rich usually don't get arrested.

Posted at 2:23PM on Feb 19th 2008 by vkngdtr

68. This photo is proof positive why she needs a conservatorship; she still can't be bothered to put on panties, she's still being a media whore & showing off her snatch. Nice huge wart on her right wrist, by the way...

Stupid dumbass media whoring slut...

Posted at 2:32PM on Feb 19th 2008 by She's a leg spread slut

69. You damn freaks at TMZ, that is a nude panty....jerks. Geesh! Why don't you guys get a life...and while you're at it, get a real effin job.

Posted at 2:34PM on Feb 19th 2008 by ME

70. I've grown tired of seeing these types of shots, I'd rather see Paris picking her nose....You guys should be ashamed of yourself the way you are stalking this mentally ill girl...Isn't there anything else you could report on?

GOT A LIFE TMZ? Obviously not.

Posted at 2:37PM on Feb 19th 2008 by LAinTX

71. One of Britney's idiotic defenders said she has on "invisible" panties, or "pink" panties.......haha
She could do pornography in front of children, and they would defend the nasty whore.

Posted at 2:46PM on Feb 19th 2008 by vkngdtr

72. Now if a guy were to flash his crotch , his ass would be in jail. But Britney can flash and people think that's "cute"....why is she not arrested for indecent exposure? Think of all the pics the kids will have to look at of 'mommy' when they grow up....maybe they will do the same. She is a good example of parenting isn't she? She is very ho hum now.

Posted at 2:56PM on Feb 19th 2008 by pockets

73. I went to the site that published this photo and it is obvious that all you can see is her right breast hanging in her crotch. There's anot6her photo with it and appears Britney is about 50 lbs heavier than she was not long ago.

Posted at 3:00PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Janelle

74. 66. First of all if people have seen the real pictures you can't even see anything. I've seen pictures that are closer up and she is indeed wearing underwear.

Posted at 2:15PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Daniel
who cares whether she is wearingunderwear or not?? There are ways to get out of a car like a lady, regardless if there are cameras right there. It reminds me of how we tell my 4 year old niece "it's not nice to show everyone your panties" Come on...

Posted at 3:02PM on Feb 19th 2008 by Kelli

75. http://storage.infdaily.com/560802.jpg

you can't see anything!!!

Posted at 3:05PM on Feb 19th 2008 by me

Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

Hot Tips