Hey Sam! You Got Served!

91. I thought I had read somewhere that Reva Goetz would take "live" testamony (?) from Sam if he was not served in time..did anyone else read this or am I just getting old and doing too much homework?

Posted at 6:47PM on Feb 21st 2008 by Brit Fan

92. # "81" The extreme last thing Britney needs is the crazy leading the crazier! Rosie O-Don't is nuts and not about a guy's.

This is what life will give you if you sell your sole and your daughters for fame & money. It also happens to strippers and barfly's they get the cream of the crop men/convicts...100% Total Pick of the litter.

Posted at 6:51PM on Feb 21st 2008 by Rusty Vain

93. 86. Signing off for now. Gotta go visit my nephew, who is 7 hours old.
Posted at 6:41PM on Feb 21st 2008 by lawdawg
---

awwwwwwwww. congrats

Posted at 6:51PM on Feb 21st 2008 by britaculous

94. britaculous: Sorry, I couldn't resist one more comment before getting out the door. I don't think burden of proof will even come into play, assuming such a suit were filed. Typically, what happens is, the defendant first files a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that the complaint on its face does not state a proper claim for relief. One of the things that the complaint has to do is set forth the court's jurisdiction to hear the case, and that is where Eardley stumbles over the same problem he has with regard to the removal action -- Brit currently does not the capacity to retain an attorney and therefore lacks standing to sue. The second problem is that RICO has to be pleaded with particularity -- RICO stands for "Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations" -- essentially, it was originally enacted as a conspiracy statute as a way to reach mob-influenced businesses, but it has been expanded to include other business conspiracies. Very difficult to state a claim, and even more difficult to prove it. Remember, Eardley is financing this out of his own pocket (or someone is bankrolling him) on a contingent, so one has to wonder how much more risk he is willing to take. My guess is, not much. The court will slap him down, with sanctions. I wouldn't be surprised if the USDC enjoined Eardley from filing any more suits on behalf of Britney -- it would simply enter an order directing the clerk's office not to accept any pleadings unless they are filed by the co-conservators' counsel.

Posted at 7:00PM on Feb 21st 2008 by lawdawg

95. This guy is real slime, but his PR man Sand's even slimier because is the one that is telling Osama what to do. But I so believe in Karma, Mr. Sands exposed his ex-wife as a Bipolar patient, uses his own son for publicity to garner sympathy for himself. But neither one of them is worth a crap. Im sure Mr. Sand's sympathizes with Osama because he too probably had a hand in having his wife declared unfit and probably showed Osama the ropes! Until either one of them can produce a prescription for the meds Osama was giving Britney, he is guilty as sin and he should be investigated. I don't trust anything that comes out of Mr. Sands mouth (whatever little is decipherable) or any comments Osama makes against the Spears family. Britney seems alot better since he's been gone. Im sure she would have been dead by now if her family had not stepped in at the rate she was going. This is a family matter and everybody needs to step back and let her family take care of business. Obviously she doesnt mind, she's been seen with her mom very happy as well as acting like daddy's little girl with Jaime. The only thing she needs now is time with her son's and if people would give this family some space i'm sure she can get the medical attention she needs for whatever condition she has, Bipolar or Borderline Personality (most likely, as I am bipolar and my symptoms were similar to Britney's and they can be confused, or a person can be diagnosed with both). Treatment is for life and the patient must give 100% commitment to taking their meds, as well as therapy is a good psychologist. But there is absolutely no reason for her not to have a normal life in the future if given the tools to deal with whatever ails her. For those interested, you can learn moe by going to http://www.nami.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Inform_Yourself/About_Mental_Illness/About_Mental_Illness.htm As for Mr. Sand's, i've bee corresponding back and forth because he was supossedly going to start a Non-Profit Bipolar organization and I sent him some links to use, But talk is cheap and he has not posted anything. I contacted him because I was outraged that he would humiliate his ex-wife and son by revealing she is Bipolar when this woman has nothing to do with celebrity and God knows how this has affected her. I honeslty think HE has mental problems, the type that believes their own lies and have airs of grandiosity,

Posted at 7:13PM on Feb 21st 2008 by TEAM KFED

96. this guy needs to blow him self up, in some dark alley

Posted at 12:16AM on Mar 1st 2008 by Booey

97. I've noticed the comments are getting less frequent on Brit stories. I think the public are getting bored with this whole fiasco.

Posted at 7:03PM on Feb 21st 2008 by Anonymous

98. What does this guy actually DO for a living? I know his IMDB credits are all bogus, but seriously, how does he make money? Who are his parents? Do they have money? I hear they own gas stations (how glamorous), but what does HE DO? He says he never took $ from her, he says he's never been paid by x-17 or anyone else for photos/info. How does he pay his bills? This dude should make infomercials on how to get money, cars and attention from conning rich people and filing frivolous lawsuits.

Posted at 7:16PM on Feb 21st 2008 by Boo

99. Wow Lawdawg, thanks.
Exactly just a PR stunt while Eardley TRIES to get some silly reason to the judge for moving the case! And as he has til the 29th it's no surprise that they are waiting til then to file these new papers! I hope they get slapped with the legal fees on the 29th.... and as you say the court clamps him down with other sanctions!

Wonder what else Sands is gonna cook up for Sam's court case! Sam has the so-called "film producer" credits, but it looks like Sands is the real story-maker!

Posted at 7:30PM on Feb 21st 2008 by britaculous

100. i agree with anonymous, people are losing interest in this story, it's not that interesting anymore.

Posted at 7:33PM on Feb 21st 2008 by tuna marie

101. Britalicious: You are so right about Sands being the story maker, if you could read the emails he's sent me you'd ROFL. If you read my previous post, you'll know what I mean, but here's an exerpt "this case will help Britney and many people forced into conservatorships where people get fleeced of their money by family members" THE ONLY THING HE HASNT REALIZED IS THAT HIS CLIENT, OSAMA IS DOING THE FLEECING.
This one was from the 11th if Feb: "It is okay...right now I am working on my Marine Air Wing deploying to Iraq and other government work." (YEAH, RIGHT)
This guy is so full of crap!

Posted at 7:37PM on Feb 21st 2008 by TEAM KFED

102. My comment is simple. Do you think, with all of the positive things that Mr. Spears has done since he's had conservatorship, that he wouldn't dot the i and cross the t and be stupid enough to serve this ass with an expired order??? It just doesn't ring true.

Posted at 7:43PM on Feb 21st 2008 by What the ...?

103. Team KFed. lol - You're right. I would probably ROFLMAO. The guy needs his head examined.
Maybe he'll have some wacky defense Sam can use for drugging Brit...
Hey maybe they all REALLY do believe in what they are doing... Then the judge can section them all!

Posted at 7:45PM on Feb 21st 2008 by britaculous

104. Hey, What the ... ?
[Posted at 7:43PM on Feb 21st 2008 by What the ...?]

See post #52 :
------
Mickey, actually, it will stick. The purpose of the requirement that a person be served 48 hours in advance of the hearing is to give him/her an opportunity to prepare and, if they want, to retain counsel to appear at the hearing and argue why the TRO should not be made a permanent restraining order. Since Sam was served less than 48 hours before the scheduled hearing, the court can -- and probably will -- reschedule the hearing and extend the TRO until the new hearing date. That gives Sam ample notice and time to appear. This avoids the need to re-serve. Now that Sam has been served, the conservators' counsel can give notice of future proceedings by regular mail.
Posted at 5:20PM on Feb 21st 2008 by lawdawg
------------

Posted at 7:48PM on Feb 21st 2008 by britaculous

105. Good What a freaking loser!!!

Posted at 7:50PM on Feb 21st 2008 by 5678