46. "Why can't this generation be like Eastwood or Nicholson ? Pretty normal, except for the marriages, and they all do that."

ill give you that eastwood is cool.

but nicholson? ok great actor, but he has been a habitual cocain user since he was young! and still hasn't stopped. why do you think he's always wearing sun glasses? sunny california isn't good for weak eyes due to snorting so much blow. and i also remember nicholson meeting with castro and becoming buddy buddy with him. if this is normal... shoot me now.

Posted at 12:50PM on Feb 25th 2008 by lalalalalala

47. Little tight on the vest there Sharon - you're not a teenager anymore!

Posted at 12:51PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Casey

48. 38. Sorry for the typos. I'm not much of a secretary. I think you guys got the drift, though. Why can't this generation be like Eastwood or Nicholson ? Pretty normal, except for the marriages, and they all do that.

Posted at 12:36PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Sheesh!

Sheesh: You don't have to be a secretary to be literate, meaning:
1. able to read and write: having the ability to read and write

2. well-educated and well-read: well-educated and cultured, especially with respect to literature or writing

3. skillfully written: showing skill in the techniques of writing

Posted at 1:00PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Tradewind

49. That is not a rat's foot or a rabbit's foot. It is a grouse's foot. Grouse feet are used to decorate Scottish kilt pins. You can clearly see the thistle in silver, where the purple stone is set. Grouse foot, grouse foot, grouse foot. Not as disgusting,but to me just as crueal

Posted at 1:05PM on Feb 25th 2008 by ScotsWife

50. I don't care if it IS a traditional Scottish brooch...it is STILL ugly, and (ewww) why would you want to wear dead animal parts to a formal event? It's not like Sharon was born and raised in Scotland, complete with a brogue....no, she's just weird. The rest of the outfit sucks, too. Since she's so into wearing little dead digits, I'm surprised she didn't have a piece of jewelry made from her ex-husband's toe, which was bitten off by a caiman at the San Francisco zoo!

Posted at 1:14PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Cynic

51. That is not a rats' paw... that would be one oversized rat.. it is more like a rabbit foot, or even a cat... I have a couple of pet rats here at home and their paws are not even close to that size and I have some seriously obese rats here :-)

Posted at 1:24PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Suzanne

52. What a sick witch! I'm so tired of celebrities wearing fur. Stone's accessory is particularly gruesome.

Posted at 1:26PM on Feb 25th 2008 by ellie

53. SHARON JUST WANTS ATTENTION. AND SHE DOES THINGS LIKE THIS TO APPEAR YOUNG AND KEEP PEOPLE TALKING. HAVING DEAD ANIMAL'S FINGER NAILS ON YOUR CHEST IS A MACHO MOVE AND AN ATTENTION GETTING PLOY. OF COURSE SHE HAD PLASTIC SURGERY.

Posted at 1:29PM on Feb 25th 2008 by JUST THE FACTS

54. Sharon should have sent the rat's paw in for a manicure.

She could clean her teeth with it after dinner!

Posted at 1:32PM on Feb 25th 2008 by My 2¢

55. It's all about check and balance. If there is slaughter house, there is PETA. Now, waiter, for my lunch, I would like to have a dozen slices of wild tuna seared on PETA breads please. Live today, die tomorrow. The food chain will work its own wonder.

Posted at 1:32PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Inotice

56. I love the Peta people but the comment is as stupid as Sharon's decision to wear that hideous brooch.
Their cattiness undermines all of their credibility.
If they know as much about animals as they think they do, any moron can see that it would be a giant mutant monster rat to have a paw that big.
It's a "lucky" Rabbit's foot idiots.

The broach is freakish and unnecessary.
She must be doing it on purpose.

Why, Sharon?
WHY?

Posted at 1:34PM on Feb 25th 2008 by It's A Rabbit's Foot -Loosers

57. I don't give a rat's azz what is is - rat, grouse, Scottish, Victorian, antique, maybe even valuable? It's disgusting, and so is she.

Posted at 1:34PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Do You Read Anything Else Besides TMZ?

58. It's the fingers from the Giant Man eating lizard monster that almost ate and killed her X-Husband.
no one messes with Sharon!

Posted at 1:34PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Rusty Vain

59. Haggard? -my ass.

I'd like to see the Peta person that said that when they are Sharon's age.
I bet it's a cheetos munching, web surfing, 23 year old fat assed cow.
She's HOT for her age you idiot. Nobody can deny that.
The animal cruelty on the other hand is not attractive but it has nothing to do with her looks. If you want people to take your association seriously, stick to the facts and lay off petty things like age.

Its people like you that create the self-image problems women have today. You might like animals but you obviously don't like older women. With irresponsible comments like that, I have lost all respect for your flaky association.

Posted at 1:35PM on Feb 25th 2008 by I hate the broach but Cruela looks hot for her age- Fat Ass

60. Looks like an old traditional Scottish or English pin to me. It was probably handed down to her, and it's certainly different.
It's a hoot, just like Sharon. She's never afraid to push the envelope, because she's seen a few years. Lol at the pin.

Posted at 1:40PM on Feb 25th 2008 by Flames Fan