Fed Judge to Brit -- You're Outta Here!

31. Ca is not paying for Brit's attorneys LOL She has to pay for her divorce attorneys, the mooches attorneys,for everything.
Unlike some p[eople she can pay her own way. So don't worry about Ca tax payers.

Posted at 9:11PM on Feb 26th 2008 by Judy

32.
Great to see that it was kicked out of federal court.

I’m glad that I don’t have friends like Sam who cost me $40,000.

I wish the attorney’s fees had been awarded because it was such a blatantly stupid case in the first place.

Posted at 8:04PM on Feb 26th 2008 by DIANE T

33. Well, there never was any question in my mind that the federal court would reject Eardley's attempt to remove the case. But aside from the typo in the final sentence of section B, I think the court erred in its judgment by not awarding the conservator's legal fees when he prevailed. I can only speculate that court believes Britney is directly or indirectly behind this, and that the cost for such a stupid maneuver should be ultimately borne by her from her own assets, even though they are managed by the co-conservators. If that is the judge's reasoning, I'm not sure Britney can appreciate it. I don't think she thinks about money or what things cost, so $40,000 is something she is unlikely to give a second thought.

Posted at 8:05PM on Feb 26th 2008 by lawdawg

34. Advice for slutney:

You are one sick blogger.

Posted at 8:05PM on Feb 26th 2008 by Whatever

35. i think the term for ............when a bad lawyer gets caught with his pants down................is .........

he was " SLOPPY "....

anyway....thats what they said my lawyer was.....because he screwed up my childsupport case....and i told him i didnt want him...........but he kept showing up..........acting like he was my lawyer.........

and the other lawyers ...said ............he was sloppy................lol....

Posted at 5:37PM on Mar 3rd 2008 by cat

36. Hey lawdwag. Hows u. You're probably right as they deemed it inappropriate. So they must have been a little bit swayed by his argument that she retained him. Oh well. On to the next step..... Wonder if Ingham will get his report done on time this time!

Posted at 8:11PM on Feb 26th 2008 by britaculous

37. well i guess then T&T are sloppy too!

Posted at 8:13PM on Feb 26th 2008 by britaculous

38. britaculous: I agree that we probably haven't heard the last from Sands. Something tells me -- a suspicion, nothing more -- that Sands is the one who hooked up Sam/Britney with Eardley. Loved the footnote in the conservator's reply brief yesterday about the contradiction between Eardleys' claims that Britney's privacy needs to be protected and his publicist's (Sands) act in handing out free copies of the notice of removal to members of the press at the Probate Court. The irony is fabulous!

Posted at 8:14PM on Feb 26th 2008 by lawdawg

39. Whether Brit was directly or indirectly involved, as a lawyer, Eardley knew the case was frivolous, and should have advised his client(s). That's the trouble with a lot of lawyers, people present a case to them, and even though the lawyer knows there is no case, they pursue it anyway to rack up billable hours. A good, honest, attorney informs people when they don't have a case, and moves on to help people who do. If Eardley pursued this for notariety because Brit's name was involved, he failed miserably, and made an enormous fool of himself personally and professionally. Bella

Posted at 8:15PM on Feb 26th 2008 by Bella

40. Advice for Slutney: Wow! I can see you are just full of empathy for your fellow mankind! I hope nobody in your family ever has any type of addiction problems or has eating disorders. As for Britney losing 150 lbs, you must suffer from anorexia or bulimia, because she looks great for a mom of two, who had her kids back to back, even if it was with a surgeon, her weight is just fine. Enough is enough. She certainly did get herself into all this trouble and then to hook up with somebody like Lutfi who has made a living out of preying on people like her was the cherry on top of the icing on the cake! But I must asume you don't have a blemish on your character because God certainly will judge you with the same ruler you judge others.

Posted at 8:19PM on Feb 26th 2008 by TEAM KFED

41. Bella: Let's hope Eardley gets stiffed on his fees and costs! His professional reputation has certainly suffered. Serves him right.

Posted at 8:17PM on Feb 26th 2008 by lawdawg

42.

Okay, the judge should have awarded attorney fess and the California Bar should consider sanctions on this jackass...

Posted at 8:22PM on Feb 26th 2008 by Firewmn

43. Hey lawdawg: I AGREE COMPLETELY - CAN'T HAPPEN SOON ENOUGH. Lawyers don't need colleages like him, and the public sure as hell don't either. Bella

Posted at 8:23PM on Feb 26th 2008 by Bella

44. oopppss. that is "FEEs" people.. I meant Fee's... sorry..dang bifocals!

Posted at 8:24PM on Feb 26th 2008 by firewmn

45. Yea lawdawg. The whole thing is contradictory. She's not allowed to talk to her friends, yet Adnan visits frequently, Alli claims she talked to her, she is always pictured with a phone in her hand... She contacted him on the day she spent with Mom and at Millenium (not on one of the days she was most likely alone at home or could have sneaked a quit call in)...
And all this at the same time it was obvious to everyone that she would be able to get closer to her kids. Many perceive her as a "dumb blonde" but she's can't be THAT dumb.

I honestly think she did go to Streisand because she was worried about losing control. But at some point after Daddy laid down the law and they explained their plan at getting her closer to the kids she must have thought the step by step process would work in her favour...!? Maybe I'm just to ooptimistic here.

But if the court took into account that Brit could be behind it... Whatabout the fact that he's doen this before?



Bella. Thus the theory that it was Sam/Sands that went to him.. just another stage in their hunger for 15mins!

Posted at 8:25PM on Feb 26th 2008 by britaculous