Court to Brit's Daddy: Stick Around Pop!

46. 32. #22 I'm glad to see someone else agrees. But even if the Doc's made their report on Sat. There was no emergency to spend more of her money to race to court 5 days early. The facts could have been given at that time. Why such a long amount of time given? Why not just another 2 week or 30 day's?

Posted at 9:49PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Confused

**********************

33. Even if the Docs on Sat. Deemed her Crazy as a loon......Why would her "Daddy" spend more of her money on something that would be in court in about 5 day's? Other than to keep her from testifying against the very people she really needs protection from.

Posted at 9:49PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Confused

***********************

Confused, I understand your confusion, but there was no "race" to the court today. Daddy Spears didn't spend one dime today. All that happened is that all the reports that the court was waiting to receive have been filed and the court has reviewed them. Apparently Britney waived hearing, so the court had everything it needed to make its findings and render a decision. There is no need for the hearing on the 10th, so that will be, in courtspeak, vacated. Courts don't waste time conducting hearings when there are no contested issues, the docket is simply too full.

Posted at 10:20PM on Mar 5th 2008 by lawdawg

47. Britt--Let your family surround you and help you get well for yourself & for your boys.
Rid your life of the poisonous elements that try to harm you.
Your fans are all here for you.
Maybe the Photogs should give the family a dam break!

Posted at 10:25PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Madison WI Brit Fan!

48. ..I AGREE..

Posted at 10:29PM on Mar 5th 2008 by jr

49. Hey lawdawg. Where you been hiding.... Yes. The scenario sounds very familiar,,,, No names mentioned as to the fraudster. Interesting to see what they take into account. How do you think it might impact the custody case? I,e, if they come to an agreement can they right conditions in it that come to an end if the conservatorship ends? I assume that any agreement would remain in effect unless one of the parties broke a condition.... I guess this also means that Pops can make sure she cannot testify on the 17th, i.e. if she were subpoenad, they could use the same reasoning as the crim case?

Posted at 10:31PM on Mar 5th 2008 by britaculous

50. ...YEAH FRASER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...THAT WOULD BE GRT!!!!!!...TALL ORDER THOUGH.

Posted at 10:32PM on Mar 5th 2008 by jr

51. #49 - Well said! You get a round of applause. That brick-headed individual is Extremely annoying.

Posted at 10:33PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Bluejeans

52. lawdawg, I wish that TMZ would add you as an additional filter to explain the minimalist coverage they give to the stories. My expertise is not in legal areas such as this, so an educated voice is appreciated! And where there is a lack of information or understanding, you will find an industry of rumor mills cropping up!

Posted at 10:33PM on Mar 5th 2008 by You're appreciated!

53. I think he dad need to keep her away from the Ring-Dings and Ho-Ho's. Nice tripple chin there

Posted at 9:58AM on Mar 6th 2008 by mrballgag

54. He is Britney's and Jaime-Lynn's Father but, he has a bigger fan-base across the World than the "Spearettes" do now. We love you Daddy Spears!!

Open your eyes, Britney! Find a REAL man like your daddy. You don't needed those foreign freaks and the other thieves in your life. Get rid of Ali too.

Posted at 10:35PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Janice

55. #43 me:

No this won't happen to me, but I suspect it could Easily happen to you because you're a complete moron.

Posted at 10:35PM on Mar 5th 2008 by BabyBlue

56.
A question for the Sam Lutfi supporters out there.

Why is it important to you to have contact re-established between Britney Spears and Sam Lutfi?

Posted at 10:45PM on Mar 5th 2008 by DIANE T

57. Now I see what you're saying about FAMOUS ppl. Lisa, so what are your hours?

Posted at 10:46PM on Mar 5th 2008 by JM frikkin NAILED

58. Good job, Judge. I hope they extend the restraining order on Lufti too.

Posted at 10:44PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Jan

59. Thanks, appreciated. TMZ is always misreading and misinterpreting the meaning of legal things. But of course, they have to make it sensational so idiots like us will visit their site and they can get their advertising $$$$.

britaculous, I haven't been hiding so much as there really hasn't been much that TMZ reported on that was worth blogging about. I get a day of free research each month on Westlaw, so last week I did some gratuitous research on conservatorship law in California. Lots of these cases seem to involve persons diagnosed as bi-polar, and most have refused to take their meds and/or signed over financial control to someone who takes advantage of them. Sad. Anyway, except for a recent posting that looked like you had an imposter, I see that you been the voice of reason. Keep up the good blogs!

Posted at 10:47PM on Mar 5th 2008 by lawdawg

60. YES...THEY ARE GOING TO EXTEND THE RESTRAINING ORDER ON SAM LUTFI....DADDY SPEARS SHOULD TRY TO GET A RESTRAINING ORDER ON MICHAEL SANDS TOO...THOSE FILTHY PIG BASTARDOS!!!

Posted at 10:47PM on Mar 5th 2008 by Micheal Sands and Sam got KO\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'d by Poppa Spears!