46. Has it occurred to any of you dumb***es who are crying foul that, perhaps, (1) the conservators know more about Britney's actual financial condition, and they are trying to salvage some value from her dwindling assets to avoid financial problems down the road, and (2) that Britney herself might have agreed to this and maybe even suggested it? Even if this is something Britney agrees to, the conservators still have to get court permission. Yeah, I figured that you haven't considered all the angles. Imbecils!!!!!!

Posted at 8:46PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Can't Tolerate Stupid People

47. Brit probably has a lot more money going out monthly than she has coming in. I doubt she has 700K a month revenue coming in to offset expenses. So it's probably a very good idea to reveiw her finances and cut her overhead down drastically. If they break the lease on the house she's in and move to the house she owns, that would be another good move and cut an additional 30K a month in expenses. For all we know she may not have any reveue at all coming in. There are no endorsments, profitable records etc.... Maybe that's why her dad's trying to get her some paying gigs also.

Posted at 8:57PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Knooper

48. horray...................im sure he will keep one....*cough cough ...business vehicle *cough

Posted at 8:58PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Soliz\\\'S_Guurl

49. paula sister, this girl was a child when she stepped up on the world stage and pushed any one away that tryed to give her propper guidance [ if thay didn't want to party, she didn't want to listen ] and good advise.it was asif she stopped mentaly developing. like try giving a 17 year old $ 100,000,000 and no supper vision, you get our baby sister britney. yes she did earn the money and hase a right to send her hard earned cash. but she didn't have the experiance to discern the wolves from the sheep, and the wolves can always smell fresh meat. THANKS TO JAMES THE SHEPPARD THE WOLVES ARE BEAT BACK FOR NOW!!!

Posted at 9:01PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Robert

50. Good.

Posted at 9:15PM on Mar 17th 2008 by whatever

51. 48. horray...................im sure he will keep one....*cough cough ...business vehicle *cough

Posted at 8:58PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Soliz\\\'S_Guurl

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Well, let's think about this a minute. TMZ reports that the conservators asked to sell *some* of the cars. That implies, does it not, that not *all* of the cars will be sold. TMZ says the exact make and model of the cars to be sold was not discussed in open court. Hey, Soliz, didn't the conservators have the Audi and Mini towed to dealerships? And when is the last time Britney was spotted driving an Audi? How about Briteny driving a Mini? Okay, now think hard ..... I know it's painful ....... but what IF they are selling the Audi and the Mini, and keeping a few dozen of the Benz's that Brit was buying each month?

Posted at 9:22PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Can\\\'t Tolerate Stupid People

52. Selling assets is the easiest way to abuse a conservatorship. I wondered how long it would take before Jaime Spears started doing this. The state will never say that the assets were sold too cheaply, will never find any kickbacks. And if TMZ wants a story. follow the money. Find out if the buyers were Jaime Spears' drug dealers.

Posted at 9:26PM on Mar 17th 2008 by jh

53. A couple of the benz's where pro-mo's, just so people would see the brister driving a benz. "gotta drive what brit's driving" some peoples mantality!!!

Posted at 9:34PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Robert

54. Posted at 9:26PM on Mar 17th 2008 by jh: "Selling assets is the easiest way to abuse a conservatorship."

*************************************

And your authority for this is what? I think if you will read the case law about abuses of conservatorships, you will find that unscrupulous fiduciaries almost always use estate money to buy something and put it jointly in their own name and the conservatee's name so that it will look like a gift or they would someday inherit it. Selling assets is usually a sign that the estate is bloated with unproductive assets that are impairing cash flow. The concept is to sell assets that are not income-producing (uh, like automobiles?), and reinvest in assets that produce income, capital gains and/or appreciation (like securities and, in the right market, real estate).

Posted at 9:39PM on Mar 17th 2008 by lawdawg

55. Also, depreciating assets drag down the balance sheet.

Posted at 9:42PM on Mar 17th 2008 by lawdawg

56. that's called a lability.

Posted at 9:47PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Robert

57. Huh? Look, she's a nut BUT isn't her father supposed to be keeping her finances in a "holding pattern" rather than selling her crap off!

Posted at 9:54PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Rockmelon

58. Sabrina and lawdawg--you guys are sooo right on!

Posted at 9:55PM on Mar 17th 2008 by realitycheck101

59. 46. Has it occurred to any of you dumb***es who are crying foul that, perhaps, (1) the conservators know more about Britney's actual financial condition, and they are trying to salvage some value from her dwindling assets to avoid financial problems down the road, and (2) that Britney herself might have agreed to this and maybe even suggested it? Even if this is something Britney agrees to, the conservators still have to get court permission. Yeah, I figured that you haven't considered all the angles. Imbecils!!!!!!

Posted at 8:46PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Can't Tolerate Stupid People

Don't know. Don't care. Just want her to go home to the swamp so I don't have to see her everytime I turn on the TV or internet. I think ol man Spears should donate Brit-Billy to a Loo-ee-zee-anna alligator ranch. Watching this skank get pummeled around by giant reptiles would be the most entertaining thing she's ever done!

Posted at 10:00PM on Mar 17th 2008 by BigTicket

60. thay still have to pay the bills and in coming cash isn't what it used to be. and the bills are adding up

Posted at 10:03PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Robert