Celebrity Justice
Kaplan Scores -- Brit Must Pay Up

Britney has just been ordered to pay Mark Vincent Kaplan, K-Daddy's lawyer, $375,000 in lawyer's fees.

Kaplan was asking for a cool half mil over a four month period in the custody fight. Commish Scott Gordon had initially ordered Brit to pay Federleze's "reasonable" attorney's fees. Brit's lawyer said the fees were outrageous and the judge knocked it down some, but Kaplan now is deep in the green.

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 3) Previous 15 Comments

31. Very mature, 28. Almost as mature as your idol, The Whore of Babylon. Oops! I said it again!

Posted at 3:07PM on Mar 17th 2008 by MW

32. Fight this ruling . kaplan (k fed lawyer) has been defaming britney (through sands) and he is demanding that she pay his legal fees . Challenge the ruling.

Posted at 3:13PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Do NOT Pay

33. Kaplan is squeezing every red cent from Brit. He's pretty cagey. I understand the Karma Lesson; do you all think that she does ?

Posted at 7:05PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Law Dude

34. MVV... Nice comeback you must be very intelligent to call someone a name for being a good ROLE MODEL for their son's (mine) Yes i am entitled to more but I choose to WORK to SUPPORT "myself" not my ex...

Posted at 3:22PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Anonymous

35.
sounds like a nice $175 thousand discount;

just LOVE when lawyers get the high hard one !

as the saying goes:

a young just beginning puberty and her first cycle asked
her mom if she could get pregnant from anal sex ?

her mother simply replies,

butt of course, where do you think attorneys come from !

Posted at 3:42PM on Mar 17th 2008 by larry doby

36. Kaplan, you're a first class pig.

Posted at 3:52PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Vicky

37. K-Jerk should have to pay his lawyer fees not Brit! He is no different than that gold digger Heather Mills!

Posted at 3:55PM on Mar 17th 2008 by mickeylou

38. How can this money grubbin idiot even sleep at night? HE is SOOOOOO SLEAZY! Isnt he ambarrassed that he cant make his money liek a real man and is just suckin it from a celeb he doesnt even rep? What A LOSER!!!!!

Posted at 4:10PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Kim

39. kaplan should be sued by britney for deformation of character and hopefully kaplan will end up paying britney back the money he is stealing from her.
adnan,sam, and sands should be looked into for selling pics of britney.

Posted at 4:38PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Real

40. Well, first of all, Kaplan didn't get everything he asked for. The judge lowered it by something like 25 percent (half a million down to 375K).

And don't act so suprised and indignant, people, because IT WAS PART OF THE DIVORCE SETTLEMENT that Britney would pay for these legal fees. This was reported months ago, and it's totally consistent with the way that lots of divorce settlements are handled, even when the parties aren't celebrities. She was the one with the much larger income, and as was mentioned here already, when that's the case, it's normal in these kinds of cases that the fees are apportioned this way.

Also keep in mind that every time Britney did one of her immature court no-shows, she was still responsible for the legal fees of the lawyers whose time she wasted as they waited fruitlessly for her. Britney treated these people like playthings and the court appearances like a childish game, and I'm glad that she is being forced to take responsibility for her actions (for a change).

Nevertheless, none of this alters the fact that Kaplan is a greedy, self-promoting jerk, and I'm hoping that Britney's current lawyers appeal and get his fees lowered even more.

I'm interested in what will happen with the fees that Trope and Trope are asking for. They are the ones who worked for Britney and who got jerked around the most with her no-shows and her refusal to follow their advice and her childish games with them. And if I'm not mistaken, they have asked for even more than Kaplan was trying to get.

I'm sure that Trope and Trope are inflating their charges as well, and I hope the court cuts down what they will receive. However, also I hope that Britney still has to pay at least something for the irresponsible and babyish way she treated them and for all of their time that she wasted.

It's about time that Britney grows up and takes some responsiblity for her actions, instead of leaving it to others to clean up the trail of destruction that she has left behind her. If Britney herself is not mentally fit to deal with these issues, her estate (as managed by her conservators) still needs to be financially responsible and to use Britney's money to mop up her messes.

Posted at 5:14PM on Mar 17th 2008 by HooplaOinkOink

41. This guy is a legal thief nit work for a crook........

Posted at 8:11PM on Mar 17th 2008 by reddesires

42. I love all this talk about a woman "stealing" another human being.
Did anyone accuse Jerry Seinfeld of that when he ran off with an
engaged woman? Nope! Men are not dumb sheep to be "stolen" by
slinging your panties around their necks. They're consenting adults
and just as culpable.

And Diane, your info on divorce and custody is about 20 years old. Barring the unfit, Dads who don’t move out (i.e., abandon) keep the STATUS QUO that the kids live with both parents. Courts then strive to maintain this status quo, and dads who petition for it will get joint custody in most Western states. Child support is based on the state Child Support Schedule, available online, which determines each party's expected contribution. The state mandate is far less than it costs to feed, house, school and medically insure the kids unless you live in Apalachia. Visitation orders and parenting plans are very individually determined these days and no longer the cursed tender years favoring of the mom over the deadbeat and abandoning dad. Those are stereotypes. Those very stereotypes are used by deadbeat parents to excuse why they didn’t bother to spend the money to petition for joint custody. It’s easier, when you don’t actually want to parent your children, to blame a court system which is all against you, despite the fact that the argument hasn’t been valid for 20 years. In my state when both parties are working there is no alimony. When mom isn’t working she’s ordered to get a job, regardless of the children at home being infants. So puhlease, stop the 70's stereotyping and all the other caca that makes women evil and men victims. Read your state's child support enforcement schedule and see if you could feed, house, school and provide medical, dental and vision care for (average) 2 children on the paltry support amount your state feels is adequate. It’s actually a boon to the paying parent, not the custodial parent.

Posted at 11:21PM on Mar 17th 2008 by Sam

43. You know what? Britney should start charging Kaplan and the others for all this publicity they are getting! K-Fed never could afford Kaplan and Kaplan always new that. He always just wanted this whole thing for the publicity-----any kind of advertising and publicity is all good to him. Its just an extra bonus when he gets some more money from Britney. Like they say---its not personal-only business."

Posted at 2:20AM on Mar 18th 2008 by Terri

44. oh come on we knew this was coming so big deal, this is NOT news and who cares, just glad Brit is on the right track for now and has the losers out of her life.

Posted at 11:34AM on Mar 18th 2008 by DUH

45. He deserves every penny

Posted at 3:39PM on Apr 5th 2008 by fox

Previous 15 Comments