Court to Brit Wannabe: Your Claim's Bogus!

31. Is there any chance of a reconciliation between Britney and her ex-husband?

Posted at 6:50PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Pocahontas

32. My point was that Britney did have have to be "bi-polor" for her father to obtain conservatorship.

They might have proved she was "brain-washed" in which case Lutfi will still be getting his.

Posted at 6:52PM on Mar 24th 2008 by It\\\'s all about the Rainbow y\\\'all

33. I am glad Alli is no where to be seen. Was she in on the "creative intervention" with Sam?

It's hard to believe Britney was having lunch with her boyfriend earlier in the day -- and that her boyfriend was letting her know she needed to get out from under control of Sam.

Was it the 31st of January that Sam referred to in an Us Mag issue recently, that he gave Britney a handful of pills before her parents came over?

I still can't believe the likes of Lufti and some psychiatrist were able to have Brit, not just committed but escorted by the police ....against her family's wishes.

Posted at 6:56PM on Mar 24th 2008 by It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s all about the Rainbow y\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'all

34. How much power did Sam have by then? Does he or doesn't he, or did he have a durable power of attorney over Brit?

Posted at 6:58PM on Mar 24th 2008 by It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

35. Too bad.
We wanted to see the crazy melt down again.
Oh well, all in good time.

Posted at 7:12PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Lily

36. Being mentally ill doesn't mean you can abuse your kids or steal or hit and run.
She should be in jail or the nut house.

Posted at 7:14PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Karma

37. Karma, you were never young.

As for abuse, still no proof she abused her kids. The incident with the younger child happened while Brit and K-Fed were in Texas and the child was in the care of a Nanny back in CA.

Posted at 7:22PM on Mar 24th 2008 by It's all about the Rainbow y'all

38. Re 37:

You know far too much about this for a normal person. Bi-polar too?

Posted at 7:25PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Karma

39. She stole a lighter, big deal. The owner was not upset. If you watch the clip, Britney is not "bragging" that she stole the lighter, she's being a kid. eewww, shock value, I stole a lighter.

Paps loved it.

The hit and run was teensy. She did stop to look and see what damage she might have done -- a scratch?

She doesn't deserve the bin of hit and run -- the one that hit my sister, came back viewed the "body" and her bicycle and left the scene again.

And Brit did have a driver's license - it was just out of state. I still think Brit was unfairly cited on that one.

Posted at 7:25PM on Mar 24th 2008 by It\\\'s all about the Rainbow y\\\'all

40. Re Karma
I agree. She was caught on film stealing and hit and run.
If she had unsupervised visits with her kids she would harm them.

Posted at 7:27PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Rosemary

41. Big deal?

Yeah, it's against the law.

Posted at 7:30PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Karma

42. #39:

"teensy"?

"Big deal"?

Are you nuts?

Posted at 7:32PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Jeff

43. #39

Your sister shouldn't have been riding a bike in traffic.

Posted at 7:34PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Kyle

44. Yes, big deal. Who cares. The owner doesn't and he was paid anyhow. Remember? It's just a silly lighter, probably one of those free ones you get when buying a carton of cigarettes. Who cares. bfd

You never stole anything in your life? Cable maybe? Someone else's gum? A freebie at the store? A breath of someone else's air? You shorted the alms box at church?

Posted at 7:34PM on Mar 24th 2008 by It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s all about the Rainbow y\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'all

45. Nope. I didn't. But evidently you did.

Posted at 7:36PM on Mar 24th 2008 by Karma