Daniel's Death Officially Ruled Accidental

3601. instead how bout we discuss those docs out today regarding the affidavit by qv, WOW . now THATS a topic for discussion...amazing it was to see we were right all along about those sternies...sad thing is none of them prob got paid...they worked for that lowlife bunch for free and loved having their names attached to these losers...lolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Posted at 2:28PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3602. 3601. Brat talks BS

Oh heavens !!!!!!!! Sorry for the spelling error.Thank you so much for catching it. As long as we are spell checking each other I think that you also incorrectly spelled etiquette. LOL LOL LOL So right back at you dummy. That all you got Sternie?



Posted at 2:24PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat




UUUMMMM..If the spell checkers and typo tacklers are out, I better quit while I'm ahead----LOL

Posted at 2:30PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Dink

3603. 3599. I'm being sarcastic back to you. Learn to spell ETIQETTE and when you have done that, learn the meaning of the word and teach it to your ilk DUMB*$$.



Posted at 2:12PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by brat talks BS

********************** you as well should learn to spell ettiquette...DUMMY...LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Posted at 2:18PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3600. OOPS TYPE I MEANT ETIQUETTE

Posted at 2:19PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

GOOD, now you have learn't how to spell it, learn the meaning and portray in you posts, instead of blasting.

Posted at 2:38PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat and say what talk BS

3604. say what

You are right. But, you have to admit that it has been rather amusing this afternoon. LOL I needed a good laugh. Now back to the important stuff. Have you read the new docs on QV? Very interesting !

Posted at 2:31PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat

3605. GtoBrat, Tiny, Say What or Dink

What is your viewpoint of the new doc*ments up on QV's? I think they are very interesting.

Posted at 2:37PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Contemplate

3606. Stern is an a**hole
Virgie is an a**hole
Larry is an a**hole
All their lawyers are a**holes

Posted at 2:41PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by a**holes INC

3607. http://annanicoleandhowardkstern.com/042108_Waddle_sworn_statement.pdf

page 16

Ben Erwin no longer works for Lin Wood. That was very interesting.

Posted at 2:41PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Contemplate

3608. I have read the will and I don't see what relevance it has to what I posted. But that's okay I understand some of you are a little testy today after reading the court doc*ments.


IDIOT, read Anna's will and post with fact. What a MORON.

Posted at 1:42PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by stop the soap opera theories

Posted at 2:43PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by tiny

3609. 3607. GtoBrat, Tiny, Say What or Dink

What is your viewpoint of the new doc*ments up on QV's? I think they are very interesting.

Posted at 2:37PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Contemplate




Interesting is not the word! I read them last night and kind of assuming what had been going on didn't make reading about it and knowing there are e-mails etc to back it up any less amazing!

Posted at 2:45PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Dink

3610. Gtobrat and say what talk bs

Just one last time. Go back and see who stired the pot. Wasn't us. It was you of many colors. Its been a slice, but there are more important things to discuss then spell check.

Contemplate

Yes I read the docs last night. I was slightly surprised to see that Butterbutt was added to the suit. This suit will remain in state court not Federal right? Would that have something to do with the fact that proving jurisdiction with the Texas Trio is not an issue?

Posted at 2:47PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat

3611. Bea,

You out there? I am not enjoying this site anymore. Wanted to say goodbye. Hope to catch you somewhere at another time. Thanks for all the laughs!

Posted at 3:07PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Maxine

3612. GOOD, now you have learn't how to spell it, learn the meaning and portray in you posts, instead of blasting.



Posted at 2:38PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat and say what talk BS

*************************** you started it you goof...you can just call us "the finishers" lolllllllllllll

Posted at 2:57PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3613. I come on this site to read the comments & often wondered why people would be doing all the researching to dig up dirt on a little old lady in Texas who was only trying to find out why her daughter & grandson died in the presence of Howard Stern. It seemed a few of the people supporting Howard were working harder than I work at my paying job. I always had my suspicions & after reading about the lawsuit naming these bloggers my suspicions were confirmed.

What kind of person would go out on a limb for a man who has been under the radar of suspicion for many months? Maybe they wanted their names in headlines or maybe they were infactuated with the likes of Howard (puke). For whatever reason, they seem to now be "part of the gang."

I just hope they all pay dearly in dollars & emotional stress for the harm they have inflicted on an innocent woman.

Posted at 3:02PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Laura

3614. gto,tiny,contemplate,laura...yes i read the docs..amazing aint it what people will do for their 15 minutes..destrying a family even...makes me sick ...and as grateful as i am for the ones FINALLY coming forward...we wouldnt be here if not for the horrific things they ALL did..so grateful yes..forgiving...not so much...

Posted at 3:04PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3615. If Virgie is basing her lawsuit on (It damaged my ability to gain custody and visitation) She is going to have a hard time proving that. There is proof that she never spoke or tried to speak to or see her grandson Daniel for 12 years. She never sent him a BD card or even a Christmas card according to her own testimony in Fla court. She never tried to get grandparents visitation to see Daniel. She has not filed for grandparents rights in Calif against Larry for visitation rights to see DL. Nor has she filed for custody in calif. Where is her proof that this affected her rights when she has not sought those rights or ever been denied by a court of those rights.
US courts do not give custody to a grandparent over a parent, that has not been proven unfit. So she is saying she was denied rights that she legally would of never had in the first place. I truly think her case will be thrown out. The Texas State Court already sent this case to Federal court and I think it will remain there. I believe the Federal court will throw it out.
This is a lady that is being used by her attorneys for the sole purpose of getting even for Stern filing against O'Quinn.


Posted at 10:24AM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Tracy


Repost.

Posted at 3:14PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Good one!