Celebrity Justice
Daniel's Death Officially Ruled Accidental

A jury in the Bahamas investigating the death of Anna Nicole Smith's son Daniel has ruled it was caused by an accidental drug overdose, recommending no criminal charges be filed.


This verdict is huge because of what the jury didn't say -- that Howard K was responsible for the death.

The jury unanimously concluded Daniel died from "non-dependent drug use" -- meaning he wasn't addicted to what killed him.

Story developing ...

Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Anna Nicole Smith


Reader Comments

(Page 241 of 412)Previous 15 Comments | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

3601. 3599. I'm being sarcastic back to you. Learn to spell ETIQETTE and when you have done that, learn the meaning of the word and teach it to your ilk DUMB*$$.



Posted at 2:12PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by brat talks BS

********************** you as well should learn to spell ettiquette...DUMMY...LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Posted at 2:18PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3600. OOPS TYPE I MEANT ETIQUETTE

Posted at 2:19PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

GOOD, now you have learn't how to spell it, learn the meaning and portray in you posts, instead of blasting.

Posted at 2:38PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat and say what talk BS

3602. Stern is an a**hole
Virgie is an a**hole
Larry is an a**hole
All their lawyers are a**holes

Posted at 2:41PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by a**holes INC

3603. http://annanicoleandhowardkstern.com/042108_Waddle_sworn_statement.pdf

page 16

Ben Erwin no longer works for Lin Wood. That was very interesting.

Posted at 2:41PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Contemplate

3604. I have read the will and I don't see what relevance it has to what I posted. But that's okay I understand some of you are a little testy today after reading the court doc*ments.


IDIOT, read Anna's will and post with fact. What a MORON.

Posted at 1:42PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by stop the soap opera theories

Posted at 2:43PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by tiny

3605. 3607. GtoBrat, Tiny, Say What or Dink

What is your viewpoint of the new doc*ments up on QV's? I think they are very interesting.

Posted at 2:37PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Contemplate




Interesting is not the word! I read them last night and kind of assuming what had been going on didn't make reading about it and knowing there are e-mails etc to back it up any less amazing!

Posted at 2:45PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Dink

3606. Gtobrat and say what talk bs

Just one last time. Go back and see who stired the pot. Wasn't us. It was you of many colors. Its been a slice, but there are more important things to discuss then spell check.

Contemplate

Yes I read the docs last night. I was slightly surprised to see that Butterbutt was added to the suit. This suit will remain in state court not Federal right? Would that have something to do with the fact that proving jurisdiction with the Texas Trio is not an issue?

Posted at 2:47PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat

3607. GOOD, now you have learn't how to spell it, learn the meaning and portray in you posts, instead of blasting.



Posted at 2:38PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat and say what talk BS

*************************** you started it you goof...you can just call us "the finishers" lolllllllllllll

Posted at 2:57PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3608. I come on this site to read the comments & often wondered why people would be doing all the researching to dig up dirt on a little old lady in Texas who was only trying to find out why her daughter & grandson died in the presence of Howard Stern. It seemed a few of the people supporting Howard were working harder than I work at my paying job. I always had my suspicions & after reading about the lawsuit naming these bloggers my suspicions were confirmed.

What kind of person would go out on a limb for a man who has been under the radar of suspicion for many months? Maybe they wanted their names in headlines or maybe they were infactuated with the likes of Howard (puke). For whatever reason, they seem to now be "part of the gang."

I just hope they all pay dearly in dollars & emotional stress for the harm they have inflicted on an innocent woman.

Posted at 3:02PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Laura

3609. gto,tiny,contemplate,laura...yes i read the docs..amazing aint it what people will do for their 15 minutes..destrying a family even...makes me sick ...and as grateful as i am for the ones FINALLY coming forward...we wouldnt be here if not for the horrific things they ALL did..so grateful yes..forgiving...not so much...

Posted at 3:04PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by say what

3610. Bea,

You out there? I am not enjoying this site anymore. Wanted to say goodbye. Hope to catch you somewhere at another time. Thanks for all the laughs!

Posted at 3:07PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Maxine

3611. If Virgie is basing her lawsuit on (It damaged my ability to gain custody and visitation) She is going to have a hard time proving that. There is proof that she never spoke or tried to speak to or see her grandson Daniel for 12 years. She never sent him a BD card or even a Christmas card according to her own testimony in Fla court. She never tried to get grandparents visitation to see Daniel. She has not filed for grandparents rights in Calif against Larry for visitation rights to see DL. Nor has she filed for custody in calif. Where is her proof that this affected her rights when she has not sought those rights or ever been denied by a court of those rights.
US courts do not give custody to a grandparent over a parent, that has not been proven unfit. So she is saying she was denied rights that she legally would of never had in the first place. I truly think her case will be thrown out. The Texas State Court already sent this case to Federal court and I think it will remain there. I believe the Federal court will throw it out.
This is a lady that is being used by her attorneys for the sole purpose of getting even for Stern filing against O'Quinn.


Posted at 10:24AM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Tracy


Repost.

Posted at 3:14PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Good one!

3612. 25271. 25324. 25280. Have been very busy, but my friends keep me informed of what the public is thinking and doing. There is much more to come. Please know that all your kind words, thoughts and work has not gone unnoticed or unappreciated.
Justice sometimes takes time.

Posted at 6:04PM on Jul 9th 2007 by The lady in the purple outfit


Is this from Virgie??

Posted at 9:33PM on Jul 9th 2007 by uncle dufflebag

Sure sounds like it could be ! She was wearing a purple outfit at one of the court appearances ,wasn't she???
Posted at 10:04PM on Jul 9th 2007 by Marge Billings

Posted at 3:19PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by i wonder

3613. I'm sorry. I know brat, say what and tiny are right.
But my brain don't work to well. I just like fooling around because i don't have anything better to do. My life is actually useless. But, please let me post my crap, cause that is what gets me off. I really thought "Edikit" was spelled this way.
I'm such a RETARD !!!

Posted at 3:22PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat and say what talk BS

3614. ciz4klowns wrote:
She is bound and determined to get some money off of the death of her daughter no matter what it takes.

So sad she didn't put this much effort into Anna when she was alive.
4/21/2008 8:55:55 PM
anudagirl wrote:
In breaking news...Montgomery County residents are suing Virgie Arthur for dragging down property values.
4/21/2008 9:13:53 PM

coolbear wrote:
That woman has gone CrAzY! If she was wanting to restore her reputation she should have stayed obscure...we had already moved on and forgotten about her..I'm getting the impression that she just missed being in the spotlight! I hate that the woman claims her residency in Montgomery County! This woman is still trying to gain custody of that baby???? I could see wanting to visit her but the baby HAS a father!...GO AWAY VIRGIE..give it a REST!!
TC00 wrote:
So sad that the only thing this women sees is dollar signs. I truly believe in what goes around comes around and she will pay dearly for her greed.

Posted at 3:26PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Need I say more?

3615. Tracy

How do we KNOW what Virgie did or did not do? Can you say with certainty that she never ever sent Daniel a birthday card? Can you swear that Anna never called her? We have no way, other then the word of Howielied, to verify anything. MAYBE when the defamation suit plays out, we will learn that all is not what we preceive them to be. How would you feel if it was proven, that Anna called Virgie, Daniel had talked to her, she had sent Christmas and birthday cards?

The thing here is that we don't know. We know the picture that Howielied has painted and it most certainly is not a pretty one. Even if all that has been said is true, does that mean that Virgie didn't love her daughter, love her grandson? To say the least they may have had a very volatile relationship. Anna was Anna after all. I think we should wait before we pass judgement on a mother/grandmother who is grieving

Posted at 3:36PM on Apr 22nd 2008 by Gtobrat

Previous 15 Comments | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments