
Turns out it was taken back in 2003 for a Glamour magazine photo shoot, ancient history in Britwreck time. So she probably was 15 pounds lighter ... but that was well over four years ago.

I love the comments about how this is "bad journalism", bah, hah, hah..............JOURNALISM? None of this is journalism, no tabloid, no celibrity web site. Websters would classify it as "GOSSIP." Journalism is a whole different animal, a concept that is losing ground daily, sadly. It is the reporting of truth, facts, and the passion to search for the truth, to change the world. How could you even be surprised that these stories for the most part are untrue? I read them for entertainment that is all, for journalism I read the New York Times and well sometimes these days they stray away from true journalism too. Unfortunately, the grey area has taken over.
Sab, just watching you take a stab at the English language is enough proof ( or shud I say enuv pruf?).
Sorry like duh! but this is an internet forum not a formal letter!and incase u hadnt noticed comments are supposed t b about the above topic not about takin a personal stab at d participants u fool!im not even gona reply to any more of ur comments cuz ur obv an idiot wit a chip on ur shoulder!get a life!
62. I forgot to say in my earlier post that Britney looks absolutely amazing. She is a mother of TWO!
Posted at 10:13PM on Apr 2nd 2008 by Lynn
ROFLMAO you MUST be kidding she's a skank whore
Regardless, Britney's looking fabulous these days and i hope she keeps it up. She may not look 17 anymore, but that's because she's not! If she gets even CLOSE to what she was, she is going to be a knock-out again. ;-)
Britney Spears might miss a lot more 'X Factor' auditions ... because she can! Simon Cowell gave Brit damn near free reign in order to sign the pop star to that $15 million deal -- but is it backfiring? We'll tell you what peeps on the set are saying.Plus, Chris Jericho's…