Beauty
Joan Van Ark -- "Knot" Bad!

Joan Van ArkIt looks like gorgeous former "Knots Landing" star Joan Van Ark has been using her nighttime soap correctly!

The 64-year-old natural beauty turned up at a Beverly Hills charity event on Thursday, looking a million times better than she did back in December.

Thankfully, Joan is one Hollywood actress not getting injected with motor oil. She looks good!



Tags: Joan Van Ark, JoanVanArk

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 6) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. She really needs to learn how to apply eye make up. The mascara and eyeliner looks DREADFUL! Buy a new tube of mascara lady - why you sticking with an old one that is clumping and messy!

Posted at 1:51PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Jennifa O Jenny

32. ARE YOUFRIGGIN BLIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 3:27PM on Apr 7th 2008 by DSW69

33. I am sorry, but I ve always like Joan, But to say its all natural, Come on now, Anyone who has seen her in Knotts Landing and other shows in the past can certainly tell she has had some work done to her face. It just seem unnatural. She was so pretty back then and to see stars like her have surgery to improve, its really sad. Natural is natural in her face right now. we can only hope that eveything done on her face will relax a little. Sorry but like I said, Its not natural.

Posted at 2:06PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Lisa

34. No offense, she does not look good in this pic either.

Posted at 2:09PM on Apr 4th 2008 by mid

35. Saw her on Nip Tuck and there was nothing natural looking about her!

Posted at 2:08PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Maggie

36. She looks good for a cadaver. Way too many lifts and lasers as anyone can see.

Posted at 2:09PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Sparky

37. Okay...wait a minute!!! I remember not to long ago a pic of her showed up on TMZ and they were RIPPING her apart....NOW all of a sudden TMZ puts a pic of her and claims how beautiful she is?! TMZ pull your head out of your know what and get your stories straight!
BTW......she STILL looks bad.

Posted at 2:21PM on Apr 4th 2008 by sjw

38. Natural or not, I'd still nail her!

Posted at 7:42PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Stan

39. what's with the weird reddish brown eyebrows? her hair is bleached blonde, her roots are black and she wears red eyebrows?? freak!

Posted at 2:46PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Kit

40. Um. She still looks like death. You just can't tell as much because the picture was taken at more of a distance than the one in December. The only difference I can see is that her eyebrows don't look as freshly tattooed as in the previous picture.

Posted at 3:23PM on Apr 4th 2008 by MalloreeH

41. Ugh! I wish he would stay home. He is getting too old to walk around like that. Grow old gracefully......like Elizabeth Taylor, your fugly tranny!

Posted at 3:00PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Hideous

42. TMZ - really?!?! Are you frigging kiddung me? She looks like a scarecrow! Skin all stretched and wrinkly (didn't even know that was possible), huge, HUGE pores, and layers of make-up on her face. She has not aged gracefully, and I am sorry, but this is not "natural" beauty. Sophia Loren - she has aged gracufully. Joan Van Ark, not so much. Looks more like Noah's Ark!

Posted at 2:57PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Roz

43. LOL are you freakin crazy ! not injected with anything? holy get your eyes checked !

Posted at 8:59AM on Apr 7th 2008 by Tammy

44. *kidding*

Posted at 3:00PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Roz

45. HA! You Call This Natural???? Yeah! Natural...as in Stone Age...As In Relic? She is mad ugly now. Sad. Too much Botox around the lips and into the forehead, etc. She use to be such a beauty!

Posted at 3:10PM on Apr 4th 2008 by MyTitsSag Too

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments