Beauty
Joan Van Ark -- "Knot" Bad!

Joan Van ArkIt looks like gorgeous former "Knots Landing" star Joan Van Ark has been using her nighttime soap correctly!

The 64-year-old natural beauty turned up at a Beverly Hills charity event on Thursday, looking a million times better than she did back in December.

Thankfully, Joan is one Hollywood actress not getting injected with motor oil. She looks good!



Filed under: Beauty


Tags: Joan Van Ark, JoanVanArk

Reader Comments

(Page 3 of 6)Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

31. She looks good for a cadaver. Way too many lifts and lasers as anyone can see.

Posted at 2:09PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Sparky

32. Okay...wait a minute!!! I remember not to long ago a pic of her showed up on TMZ and they were RIPPING her apart....NOW all of a sudden TMZ puts a pic of her and claims how beautiful she is?! TMZ pull your head out of your know what and get your stories straight!
BTW......she STILL looks bad.

Posted at 2:21PM on Apr 4th 2008 by sjw

33. I dunno, there's something not quite right here. She looks bad, really bad and could use lip liner, but her eyes (and maybe brows) look as though she's got that tattooed-on makeup look. I've seen it before and that stuff looks awful as one ages - as with most tattoos over the years they tend to bleed and smudge. She needs to take it easy and enjoy the rest of her life.

Posted at 2:26PM on Apr 4th 2008 by MallowMind

34. what's with the weird reddish brown eyebrows? her hair is bleached blonde, her roots are black and she wears red eyebrows?? freak!

Posted at 2:46PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Kit

35. TMZ - really?!?! Are you frigging kiddung me? She looks like a scarecrow! Skin all stretched and wrinkly (didn't even know that was possible), huge, HUGE pores, and layers of make-up on her face. She has not aged gracefully, and I am sorry, but this is not "natural" beauty. Sophia Loren - she has aged gracufully. Joan Van Ark, not so much. Looks more like Noah's Ark!

Posted at 2:57PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Roz

36. Ugh! I wish he would stay home. He is getting too old to walk around like that. Grow old gracefully......like Elizabeth Taylor, your fugly tranny!

Posted at 3:00PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Hideous

37. *kidding*

Posted at 3:00PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Roz

38. HA! You Call This Natural???? Yeah! Natural...as in Stone Age...As In Relic? She is mad ugly now. Sad. Too much Botox around the lips and into the forehead, etc. She use to be such a beauty!

Posted at 3:10PM on Apr 4th 2008 by MyTitsSag Too

39. Um. She still looks like death. You just can't tell as much because the picture was taken at more of a distance than the one in December. The only difference I can see is that her eyebrows don't look as freshly tattooed as in the previous picture.

Posted at 3:23PM on Apr 4th 2008 by MalloreeH

40. I'd wreck that old plastic lasered botoxed sliced-n-diced ass.

Posted at 3:27PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Stevo

41. she looks the same as she did in the other photo

Posted at 3:32PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Lulu

42. She looks bad however I do feel sorry for her because it was probably caused from a botched Chemical peal, that's why I would never ever have one. It appears the same thing MAY have happened to Bruce Jenner as his skin has a burned look to it as well and no elasticity. There is a lot of risk to have any kind of plastic surgery or procedure that messes with you skin.

Posted at 3:38PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Knooper

43. "she looks good"??
are you kidding me?
Why doesn't she go back to her 1970's cave with Valerie Bertinelli and Kristy MacNichol!
Good Gawd!! Get your eyes checked!!

Posted at 3:48PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Vivian Ward

44. Natural my ass! Her face looks like it's plastic!

Posted at 4:12PM on Apr 4th 2008 by Jackson

45. she looks like death doesn't become her....

Posted at 4:18PM on Apr 4th 2008 by noahsark

Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments