256. In Britney's case, "exhibitionist" is even better.

Posted at 1:49PM on Apr 23rd 2008 by qwerty

257. All those Lawyers and she still lost her children. Kevin is just as pathetic but he happens to be more slick about what he does. Kevin is a leach. Brit got sloppy. Kevin should have to pay all of his own legal fees and Brit should consider a different set of attorneys next time. They sis a piss poor job for that kind of money.

Posted at 1:50AM on Apr 24th 2008 by E

258. To E (currently msg #257): blame Kevin. Blame Britney's lawyers. Blame anyone and everyone, but never blame Britney, herself. She must always remain a spoiled princess who never has to deal with the consequences of her own childish actions and stupid choices. She should be able to do whatever she wants whenever she wants to do it. She must remain totally irresponsible for the rest of her life. And finally, other people should always be the ones to clean up the messes she leaves behind her.

That's the position that you and many other people seem to be taking here.

Pay attention to facts and reality for a change:

Britney blew off one court appearance after the other. She refused to follow court orders. And she didn't follow the advice of her own lawyers. If she had done these things, she never would have lost custody of her children.

Getting her different lawyers wouldn't have made a bit of difference, because Britney wouldn't have followed _their_ advice, either, and she would have blown it just the same.

And have you forgotten that Britney's current lawyers have managed to successfully get visitation rights for Britney, even after those past debacles on her part? Jamie is forcing Britney to do what her lawyers are recommending, and now she is able to be with her children again. It looks to me that her lawyers are now _helping_ her, now that she's not able to sabotage their efforts.

Also Britney _agreed_ to the terms of the divorce with Kevin, including the amount of money that he's receiving. Her own lawyers didn't somehow force her or trick her into accepting those terms. Are you saying that she should be able to go back on her legal commitments any time she feels like it?

In divorce proceedings, if one party has a significantly higher income than the other, it's common that the court will stipulate that the richer one pay the legal fees of the poorer one. This is done so that the one with more money can't engage in expensive legal maneuvers in order to force the other one to accept a bad settlement. This levels the playing field and makes for fairer settlments.

It is also common in divorce proceedings that the richer party ends up paying more of the child-support costs. This is done for similar reasons, and also, in order that the children don't suffer.

There's nothing special about Britney's case with regard to these stipulations.

Check with a divorce lawyer if you don't believe me.

Finally, keep in mind that it's _Britney_ who filed for divorce, not the other way around.

It never ceases to amaze me how many of you people take the position of "don't confuse me with logic or reality; I've already made up my mind."

Posted at 4:31AM on Apr 24th 2008 by qwerty

259. just a thing or two to consider everyone makes mistakes,what i'm saying is how freaking long does someone have to pay for making the mistakes? everyone is so quick to judge and sentence someone but want look in the dam mirror!! like they can be perfect,judging someone is one of the worst things we can do to each other as human beings! everybody has forgotten about forgiving one! each to thier on!! and one more thing people has to much time on thier hands, to always being in someone's else's dam business all the time! get a freaking life!

Posted at 8:45PM on Apr 24th 2008 by christopher

260. Re: Posted at 8:45PM on Apr 24th 2008 by christopher

*********************
What, in heaven's name, are you ranting about? Who's "everyone" that are allegedly quick to judge? And judge what?

Oh, and get a freaking dictionary and learn spelling and syntax. Punctuation, too, while you're at it. "dam" = damn. "thier" = their. "to" = too. "someone's else's" = someone else's. Better yet, just go back to third grade.

Posted at 9:02PM on Apr 24th 2008 by What??????????

261. i hope the commissioner chokes to death on her kentucky fried chicken that lousy fat ass bitch

Posted at 6:13PM on Apr 25th 2008 by carolyn

262. You sound a little bit bitter, carolyn, because someone in the world isn't blindly supporting Britney in her attempts to remain a totally irresponsible 9-year-old for the rest of her life.

The commissioner is forcing Britney (or more precisely, her estate) to pay for cleaning up the multi-million dollar trail of destruction that Britney has left in her wake. I know that you would love for Britney to never have to deal with the consequences of any of her childish choices and immature actions, and for someone else in the world to always have to pay to keep her in her totally oblivious world as a Spoiled Princess. So why don't you dig into your own wallet to pay to clean up Britney's messes and to allow her to do whatever she wants, whenever she wants to do it, without ever having to pay a cent?

If you truly love Britney, it's imperative that you give her lots of hard cash in order to support her Irresponsible Princess life style instead of just spouting off some empty words on this web site.

Money talks, BS walks, carolyn.

Posted at 9:17AM on Apr 26th 2008 by Put your money where your mouth is.

263. You people make me sick.

Posted at 5:03PM on May 1st 2008 by sabrina

264. FIRST!

Posted at 8:24PM on May 5th 2008 by FIRST!