61. 60. Bad news: The ad is pushing to people interested in little girls' panties.

Good news: The women in the ad are little women, not little girls. They're short, skinny, and wearing a good amount of make-up, but they are in their twenties.

Posted at 4:17PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Gavin
........................................................................

But in the other ad mentioned above, that girl couldn't possibly be 18 or over. She looks more like 13 or 14.

Posted at 5:09PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Disney eroticizes children

62. 62. Okay - HULLO - first of all - this is advertising in JAPAN not AMERICA - so beyond the fact that TMZ insists on turning innocence into sleaze every single chance it gets - this has nothing to do with us so how does it consistute news.
I for one - will be so happy when Levin starts getting hit with defamation lawsuits and such
========================================================================================

So do you believe in moral relativism? In other words, do you think it's OK for Disney to exploit underage girls in countries where that's part of their culture?

For those people in the U.S. who are looking to Disney to be one of their guardians of "family values", it has to be disturbing that Disney freely engages in practices that offend the Christian morals of these American families, just for the sake of making money in other countries.

On the other hand, nothing that I said here should be taken to contradict your assessment of Mr. Slime Bucket (Harvey Levin).

Posted at 5:10PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Disney Corp. are a bunch of hypocrites

63. 61. So, does this mean Asian guys have American school girl
fantasies?

Posted at 4:17PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Amanda
=======================================

You betcha! Check out some Japanese anime porn. A large proportion of those fantasies involve depictions of large-breasted American-looking females with wide-eyed, girlish looks who are wearing slutty, schoolgirl-style clothing.

Posted at 5:13PM on Apr 30th 2008 by They love our little girls

64. Miley Cyrus was NOT selling underthings....she was selling herself. A bit of difference.

Posted at 5:16PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Nshado

65. 25. What a find TMZ, the dirt is too revealing. Disney is a powerhouse though. ... Maybe that's why I love TMZ so much. You guys are not afraid to look at the truth, and bring a laugh and smile to people's faces while doing that.

Posted at 1:42PM on Apr 30th 2008 by lindy
*********************************************************

One out of every few hundred TMZ articles happens to hit on something that is marginally relevant. The rest of them are juvenile, voyeuristic trash.

Put a few dozen monkeys in a room with a bunch of typewriters, and you'll end up with a better relevancy ratio than that ... and more evolved writing skills, to boot.

Posted at 5:23PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Give thisTMZ writer a banana

66. The only thing wrong with the situation is that Disney is a big fat bowl of hypocrite.

There's nothing wrong with these pictures, there's nothing wrong with Miley's pictures...PS, everyone - that "scandalous" picture of Miley Cyrus was NOT TOPLESS. That big baggy thing was a freakin' shirt. Check out the "behind the scenes" photos for the shoot that Vanity Fair posted and you can see that it's just a strapless shirt at a different angle.

It's only a big ol' issue because we're all determined to make it one.

Posted at 5:25PM on Apr 30th 2008 by DS

67. Disgusting! If they wanna sell Disney lingerie, perhaps they should use adult women. Especially women who don't look like little girls. That's truly disturbing and I really am surprised at how low Disney has stooped. Shame! Shame! Shame!

Posted at 5:27PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Niki

68. 69. Miley Cyrus was NOT selling underthings....she was selling herself. A bit of difference.

Posted at 5:16PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Nshado
=======================================

True.

Well, actually, _almost_ true. Disney is the one selling Miley.

It's the world's oldest business.

Posted at 5:30PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Bill Ding

69. Disney is nothing more than a pimp.....they are also responsible for producing britney spears and we all know how well that worked out....

Posted at 6:25PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Mama's got a brand new bag~

70. SAVE WINIE THE POOH WHERE IS CHRISTOPHER ROBIN.................

Posted at 7:28PM on Apr 30th 2008 by tmajic

71. REMEMBER DISNEY WAS A DIRTY RAT AND HE WAS NO NICE GUY ON ANY TERMS....HE MADE SURE OTHERS FAILED......HE WAS THE WICKED WITCH , WELL WARLOCK............

Posted at 7:32PM on Apr 30th 2008 by tmajic

72. sex sells, everyboy know that, even disney, lol

Posted at 8:32PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Derek

73. My name is Roger Clemens and I approve these pictures.

Posted at 9:21PM on Apr 30th 2008 by rocket

74. Hollywoodude

You don't know what happened to Small World you say? I can tell you. It turns out that people in the 60's, when Disney built the ride, were so much more slender than our average population, that during the last few years, the people are so heavy the boats sink, sometimes leaving people stranded in Small World for hours. I think I might have seen that on TMZ, not sure now, but it was comedic. Disney has to change a lot of their rides for that reason.

Oh and what sowhat said, well, you never know when a Disney Spokesperson is trying to deflate the situation and install bad feelings as a manipulative device. Not to be paranoid, but didn't someone write an insider book about that called..The Mickey Ears exposing Disney. Not exactly sure of the name. hmmm just don't let them manipulate you TMZ

Don't get me wrong, Disneyland is a great place. Dirt is everywhere.

Posted at 11:14PM on Apr 30th 2008 by lindy

75. Oh and contrary to what that other article says, with Disney denying that they market Sexy Disney underwear at teens/young women, etc and all the stores in China are knock offs... The store where I bought my stuff was DEFINITELY a licensed Disney store. So Disney's a big fat liar.

Posted at 11:29PM on Apr 30th 2008 by Cassie