Relevant Posts
- D.A. Charges Burglar Bunch (10/28/2009) (46 comments)
- Bunch of Celebs on Burglar Bunch Computer (10/29/2009) (17 comments)
- Megan Fox Gets Bisexual Seal of Approval (10/08/2009) (30 comments)
- Megan Fox -- Beer Wench (10/04/2009) (36 comments)
- Carrie Prejean -- Softcore Hypocrite? (11/09/2009) (131 comments)
Reader Comments
(Page 2 of 4) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments16. so explain this pls-if you show her nipples we will go blind-is that it.hello -its 2008.
Posted at 2:27PM on May 12th 2008 by rock hard
17. guess what #6..she does have tats, and quite a few of them...like Marilyn Monroe on her forearm and We shall all laugh at gilded buttlerflys inked on her back
Posted at 11:05AM on May 12th 2008 by shern
18. Christ.
Posted at 11:43AM on May 12th 2008 by Stevo
19. Uh #9??? What in the hell does your posting have to do with these pics? Go put your soapbox on some other street corner!
Posted at 11:26AM on May 12th 2008 by Felons Mama
20. Very nice, I wonder if the people at TMZ would like to see their mommas topless on this website. Oh, that's right, I forgot, TMZ people were born of hienas' asses!!!
Posted at 11:32AM on May 12th 2008 by Mr. X
21. She should've picked a better pair of bottoms...her back fat is hanging out. Yuck.
Posted at 11:33AM on May 12th 2008 by Kellie
22. I'm sorry but this is one girl that I don't understand the obsession with. She looks so cheap to me.
Posted at 11:41AM on May 12th 2008 by jamie
23. WOW!!! I'VE NEVER SEEN A NAKED LADY BEFORE! GEEEEZ THIS PLACE IS GREAT! dURRRRRRRR!!
Posted at 11:41AM on May 12th 2008 by -bored already-
24. To the person saying its nice to see a girl with no tattoo...you obviously dont know her pictures very well. I am actually wondering why she has the tattoo across her rib cage covered up..you can see bits of it and that the skin tone in that area isnt quite the same...makes me think the pics are for a magazine, movie or something..not someone randomly catching her skinny dipping.
Posted at 11:59AM on May 12th 2008 by Abs
25. I aecond that,
BOING!!!!
Posted at 12:22PM on May 12th 2008 by WOO HOO
26. All you haters need to go on a diet. She's a perfect 10 (10+ with a little tan) That tiny belly is from her suit being to tight, would even happen to the stick (Olsen) twins.
Posted at 4:25PM on May 12th 2008 by Mark D
27. The pics are from a movie set and she's wearing pasties so you can't see anything anyway. TMZ trying to make it look like more than it is, again.
Posted at 12:16PM on May 12th 2008 by boredtotears
28. That roll of fat definitely needs to be worked on. And nice to see a young starlet took a different route other than the cheap topless airheads in Hollywood. NOT! She is just one of the crowd. Nothing special. Anybody can take their clothes off. The ones with brains don't. She clearly knowa the camera is there.
Posted at 12:20PM on May 12th 2008 by Chris
29. F-Listed has the uncensored photos and to be honest, it's pretty stupid to put the big stars on them, because in the actual photos she is wearing flesh-colored pasties that totally block the nipple. So what's the deal?
Posted at 12:24PM on May 12th 2008 by Disturbed
30.
dude. that picture of phil spectors hair has got to be the greatest!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
(did i miss?)
Posted at 12:30PM on May 12th 2008 by -bored already-
