They may not be of Kardashian proportions, but Fergie and Kristen Bell still have some bangin' junk in their trunks.
Snapped in the Big Apple, Fergie's leather lumps and Bell's bulbous booty proved NYC really is back!
See More
Reader Comments
(Page 1 of 1)someone said kristen is young and doesn't have to work as hard on perfecting the perfect shape of a perfect ass? what are you talking about? she's 28 in 2 months you idiot. fergie is only 5 years older. both have fine asses, but i would enjoy pounding Kristen's much more cause it looks as though it has just a little bounce to it when you pound it from behind. Fergie has a bit more ass than i like but still wouldn't kick her out
Don't base your decision just on these two photos. Look at other photos of both of them. I did! :-) And you'll see they both have very fine, uh, assets. Really. I voted for Kristen, though, because she seems maybe a little sweeter.
Put Kristen in leather pants and bounce quarters all day long! (Miss you, Veronica Mars.....)
Kristen has more CLASS than Fergie....AND she graduated from NYU Tisch School of Drama!! Kristen has the tushie, as well as the brains to go with it----
You go, Kristen!!!
i dont care wat yall think kristens ass might b small but its as hot as the rest of her
gotta be feelin some of that kristen bell backside, her glutes are nice, as this pic shows them in the makin', ;o)
i think "Bell" has the better butt. Though i really prefer boobs...
and as for kim kardashian it seems people choose the biggest butt to be the nicest ie. (J lo, kim K, beyonce etc) but i like butts morelike Jennifer Aniston and Jessica Alba plus i'm sure many would agree that Jenn and Jessica alba are way better than J lo and the rest. (keep in mind i'm not a butt fan to begin with).
Kristen Bell's ass is way better than Fergie's ass! It's probably alot cleaner too!
















