Ryan and ScarJo -- Lowballin' the Bling

We know this is going to sound ridiculous, but Scarlett Johansson's engagement ring is actually blingier and more ballin' than she's letting on.

The buzz on ScarJo's bling is that the ring -- designed by Sonia Boyajian -- is around three carats and cost about $30K. Not so, we're told -- the ring is actually "north" of four carats -- and set Ryan back a cool $120,000! Get a piece of that rock.

Reps for the couple didn't comment.

Filed under: Wacky & Weird, Department of Debunk

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 2 of 2)Previous 15 Comments

16. It's the thought that counts.
And the size of the ring tells US exactly what Ryan must think of her.
Bwahahahahaha.......

Posted at 4:11PM on May 21st 2008 by Shane

17. Speaking of beaver. Oh why do I bother. Some jokes write themselves.

Suffice it to say I never considered her all that or "hot".

Bet she just lies there like a bump on a log. Hence the small ring.

Posted at 4:15PM on May 21st 2008 by Bert

18. He's Canadian? Well well. That would explain the quick proposal. He needs her to stay in the country permanently.

Posted at 4:17PM on May 21st 2008 by Vickie

19. She is hot and he is not??????
are you FREAKING BLIND?????

Posted at 4:46PM on May 21st 2008 by Boshityboo

20. Bitch probably had to pay for her own ring too. Serves her right. I can't stand her either.

Posted at 4:48PM on May 21st 2008 by Rose

21. Scarlet is not a classic beauty and she has no features to make her stand out. Her face looks like a Dutch farmers wife, similar to the faces in Breughel's paintings.
She Should marry young because in another ten years whatever looks she has will be gone.

Posted at 4:54PM on May 21st 2008 by Tanner

22. She suggs the big one. Vapid expression . Stupid waste of space and a spehrm receptacle.

Posted at 5:02PM on May 21st 2008 by Mannie

23. Ordinary. Very ordinary. And her ring is as cheap as she looks. I could never understand why anyone in Hollywood tried to hype her.

Posted at 5:15PM on May 21st 2008 by Suze

24. i remember a few years ago, the name 'scarlett johanssen', it sounds like a wondrous actress, fresh, young and talented! and she has the memorandum of a star from the 1940s! shes annoying to be and she prolly thinks shes so wondrous!

Posted at 7:51PM on May 21st 2008 by poison APPLE

25. Evidently Scarlett can't add fractions.

3.00 or 4.00 carats of diamonds, spread over an entire ring, make for some very puny looking stones. You can hardly see them.
That's probably what some people here are pointing out. lol.

Even a 3-4 ct solitaire in a topnotch quality is not very big. But she got gypped if she really paid $120,000 for that ring.

In fact, I remember seeing a picture of her ring and thinking right away this did not come from Cartier,Chopard, Tiffany, Graff, or any other big name jewelry house.

Oh well.

Posted at 8:14PM on May 21st 2008 by Betty

26. FYI #18...actors don't require permanent residency to stay in the US! And #15...you're invited to come and stay in my Igloo should you decide to come up to Canada for a visit.

Posted at 10:26PM on May 21st 2008 by Koodo

27. What is everyone's deal saying it's a small ring?

I have a 3 1/2 carat and it's pretty darn big. Not to mention my hubby had the dent in his bank account to show for it.
There's no reason for these 12 carat rings that you keep hearing about. They're for bragging rights and that's all.

For all of you talking about how the ring is too small and how your hubby would no better, and on and on, you're probably sporting a half carat tops and are just trying to make yourselves feel better.

I'm not a fan of either one of these people, but the comments on the ring itself are just ridiculous (not to mention the story covering it)

Posted at 11:40AM on May 28th 2008 by ShellShell

Previous 15 Comments

Hot Tips