or type here...
Celebrity Justice5/23/2008 9:30 AM PDT BY TMZ STAFF
Funny, That Face Looks Real Familiar

Remember that kinda awesome Gap ad from a couple years ago with Audrey Hepburn in "Funny Face" dancing to "Back in Black"? (Yeah you do.) Well the guy who directed "Funny Face" -- Stanley Donen -- wants his cut of the cash Gap and Paramount made from the spot.

Only, oh, two years after the ad first dropped, the directing legend says in a lawsuit that the companies used his clip without permission, and wants $5 million -- or if he can't get that, $375,000, which is what he claims Paramount made.

Donen was also at the helm of "Singin' in the Rain," "On the Town," and "Damn Yankees." Reps for Paramount and Gap didn't immediately have comment.

Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

When you enter your name and email address you'll be sent a link via email to confirm your comment. Please keep your comments relevant to this post. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make the link live for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 1)
1.

DARK MEAT ONLY:  1361 days ago

1 bitches

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
2.

suzanne:  1361 days ago

good luck getting any $$$$ from gap, I work for the company and they are one of the cheapest companies out there, especially in regard to the way the treat their employees. Iam sure only the top people are making any kind of money.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
3.

suzanne:  1361 days ago

good luck getting anything from gap

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
4.

S.A.:  1361 days ago

The guy's a legend. Give him his money. How could those companies be dumb enough not to get clearance on the footage?

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
5.

Nicole:  1361 days ago

GAP NEEDS TO PAY THOSE GREEDY PIGS & GET OVER IT

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
6.

Julie:  1360 days ago

Harvey, since you're a "lawyer" you should know that the statute of limitations allows him to sue for a period of time after the event takes place. The guys doesn't have to follow the Gap's schedule of stealing his work.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
7.

MH:  1360 days ago

Julie is exactly right. If there was something inherently wrong about waiting two years to file the lawsuit, as tmz implies, the legal system wouldn't set a statute of limitations of that length to which litigants adhere. Instead, the statute of limitations would be one month or something equally absurd.


Likes 0 Dislikes 0
8.

Puleeeez:  1360 days ago

OR--maybe the behind the scenes negotiating failed and he was forcd to sue...Ya never get the whole story from TMZ,just bits enuf to make it sound embarrassing or salacious.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0
9.

Jman:  1360 days ago

The problem is that poor old Stanley doesn't really have a leg to stand on. Paramount owns the movie, not him. Stanley was just the director, he wasn't even a producer so he has no say in what Paramount does with THEIR movie. Poor old guy probably only came forward with the lawsuit because someone convinced him he had a chance. People praying on the elderly is just wrong.

Likes 0 Dislikes 0