K-Fed Shows the Kids the "Slacker Lean"
Daddy, why don't you have a job?
Relevant Posts
- K-Fed's Trashy Pad -- Bad for Brit's Kids? (10/07/2009) (113 comments)
- K-Fed Accused of Being a Dirty Home-Wrecker (10/07/2009) (80 comments)
- It's Not Delivery, It's K-Fed's Girlfriend (9/28/2009) (30 comments)
- Britney Spears -- Nowhere to Go But Up (11/07/2009) (163 comments)
- TMZ Live: Arnold, MJ's Doc & Adam Lambert (11/24/2009) (100 comments)
Reader Comments
(Page 4 of 5) Previous 15 Comments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments46. 36. Thanks, Lubbock. But I think you missed the thrust of my post. ... etc. ...
Posted at 12:29PM on May 31st 2008 by Yersinia Pestis
I'm confused. You are answering a post that I wrote to a user named "Ft. Worth", but now, you're calling yourself "Yersinia Pestis".
It's the weekend, and it looks like the imposters have arrived. This thread is going to degenerate fast, I predict.
Posted at 12:37PM on May 31st 2008 by Lubbock
47. I'm schizophrenic!!!
Posted at 12:40PM on May 31st 2008 by Yersinia Pestis
48. Quick, someone get a conservatorship for Yersinia. Wonder if that deadbeat short order cook is available.
Posted at 12:44PM on May 31st 2008 by lawdawg aka Juris D
49. Lubbock, that wasn't me, pal. Looks like the village idiots have been let loose. Signing off ....
Posted at 12:47PM on May 31st 2008 by The REAL Ft. Worth
50. 42. " WELL SEE SONS, BEING A PROFESSIONAL MOOCH IS HOW I SUPPORT MY OTHER KIDS WITH YOUR MONEY" - YEAH one day. i can't wait until she gets her kids back and he has to go back to shar's garage. She'll take him back. she's that dumb and she likes living on another woman's penny.
SHE'S AS BIG AS BUM AS HE IS. BOTH ARE TACKY
Posted at 12:44PM on May 31st 2008 by cmyman
**********************
What kind of calculator you using there, cmyman? Maybe the batteries need to be changed or the solar cells are going bad. 'Cause my calculator shows that $49,248 annually for child support paid to Shar Jackson is considerably less than the $544,074 income he receives without counting the child support from Brit-Brit. $494,826 less, to be precise.
Posted at 12:57PM on May 31st 2008 by Yersinia Pestis
51. Yeah, Ft. Worth, I'm outta here, too.
Posted at 12:59PM on May 31st 2008 by Lubbock
52. I'm the real Yersinia Pestis. The other one who appropriated my name is really Krishna.
Posted at 1:01PM on May 31st 2008 by Yersinia Pestis
53. Financial Analysis and Rationale Thought Are My Game
Kevin showed his income to the court and it was reported as *ZERO* Now STFU
Posted at 1:01PM on May 31st 2008 by tag
54. No, ***I*** am the real Yersinia Pestis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted at 1:04PM on May 31st 2008 by Yersinia Pestis
55. 47. Financial Analysis and Rationale Thought Are My Game
Kevin showed his income to the court and it was reported as *ZERO* Now STFU
Posted at 1:01PM on May 31st 2008 by tag
That was in 2007, so GFY.
Posted at 1:04PM on May 31st 2008 by Caca Cabeza
56. cmyman, you would have more credibiilty if you knew how to properly construct a contraction. It is not WELL, it's WE'LL, as in WE WILL.
Posted at 1:05PM on May 31st 2008 by The Real Yersinia Pestis
57. cmyman, you would have more credibiilty if you knew how to properly construct a contraction. It is not WELL, it's WE'LL, as in WE WILL.
Posted at 1:05PM on May 31st 2008 by The Real Yersinia Pestis
58. "The Real Yersinia Pestis" is a phony. He's really Krishna. Also, at least two of the other "Yersinia Pestis" characters are also phonies. One or more of them are actually "Financial Analysis and Rational Thought Are My Game".
Posted at 1:09PM on May 31st 2008 by Bubonic Plague
59. "tag" my boy, it NETTED out to zero. Net and gross are entirely different concepts. His gross was more than $500K. Take a second look. Generally, the goal of most reporting entities is to net out as many expenses against income as possible, so as to minimize tax liabilities. What K-Fed' accountant has allowed is to claim virtually all his expenses, personal and professional, against Gooseneck's earnings. Hence, the zero that you are reading. May not withstand IRS scrutiny for tax purposes -- the living expenses paid by Gooseneck would be deemed as constructive dividends -- but that is not the point. The point is that before expressing a view about how K-Fed manages to pay his rent and child support and nannies and security, one needs to read and understand the F/S and garner an understanding what the source of income and expenses are, and the gross and net positions.
And yes, that is the 2007 F/S. That's the one made publicly available via the court filings. Since you are so well informed about these matters, why don't you share K-Fed's 2008 financials with the rest of us? Oh, that's right, it's not the end of the fiscal year, there is no 2008 F/S yet.
I would never be so rude as to use the f word in a response to you. Have a pleasant weekend.
Posted at 1:21PM on May 31st 2008 by Financial Analysis and Rational Thought Are My Game
60. No, I'm Krishna. Wait, I'm Caca. No, make that Yersinia. Or am I Bubonic? I'm so confused!!!
Posted at 1:25PM on May 31st 2008 by Financial Analysis and Rational Thought Are My Game
