62. K-Fed doesn't have a job because he has to take care of his children since their mother is incapable of doing so. If Kevin had a full-time job, his kids would see much less of him and since they don't have a mother, in any normal respect, that would be a real shame. Kevin seems to be doing a great job with his boys so go pick on someone else and STFU.

Posted at 1:40PM on May 31st 2008 by Angelique

63. Ricky Ricardo Montalbán and Angelique: WELL SAID!!!!!!
From what we've seen, (and in fact, even his ex, Shar attests to this), Kevin is a wonderful Father! Irregardless of whether or not he has Nannies and Bodyguards, (who doesn't in Hollywood these days? Especially with four kids and no partner?!?!)Unfortunately, there are way too many people in this world who feel the need to put others down in order to feel better about themselves. That's pretty much what it boils down to.
Oh, so while Mommy was having her melt down, K-Fed took full custody of his boys so Brit could have the time she needed to get better. It must have been because he wanted more money!
So what if you hardly ever see Kevin out with his kids because he's trying to protect them from the craziness of the paparazzi? That must really mean he doesn't love his kids and never spends any time with them!
You could take anything and everything good and decent the boy does and twist into something negative. But the fact remains, he stepped up to the plate and made sure his boys were safe and got the care and love they needed. Oh, right, that's his JOB, he wasn't doing anything special. Maybe so, but there are a lot of "Dad's" out there that wouldn't care less if their children were put in the same situation.
And while I'll admit without Brit he would probably still be a back up dancer getting his car repo-ed. At the same time, because of his relationship with her and the way he was portrayed in the media from the beginning, he has been looked at as a joke and had to work 10 x as hard to be taken seriously. I mean think about it, how many auditions and projects has he probably been turned down for simply because he's K-Fed, Britney's "joke of an ex husband"? No matter what he tries to do, he faces and up hill battle in trying to get the world to see him differently than how he has been portrayed (sometimes fairly, other times not!)
I've read interviews that he's done and he seems like a decent guy. He could have very easily talked to the press all day long about his "crazy ex" in attempt to make himself look better. How many magazines do you think offered him HUGE payouts for a sit down? At least he took the high road, give the guy some credit!

Posted at 2:43PM on May 31st 2008 by Angelface

64. I was no Britney or K-Fed fan and I was just as delighted when she filed for divorce from him as everyone else was... but the guy has really stepped up and proved himself to be a GOOD 24/7 DAD to his two kids with Britney while she is a very, very troubled person in desperate need of long term help. I am glad the kids have him to be there for them and he didn't abandon them when Britney hit the fan... and he's being really cool with Britney in allowing for the visits to be increased and not fighting her on it when he could still easily win against her right now. She is a long way from being a fit parent. I take no joy in this. This is a disturbed woman and I feel nothing but empathy for her. I was NOT laughing when everyone else was using her downfall as the daily joke! I did participate in the K-Fed bashing. But now, I wish them both well but she needs to get better and good for him for being a stand-up dad and TMZ should say something good about him now...

Posted at 3:31PM on May 31st 2008 by good for them

65. Why is K-fed being praised for something that is his OBLIGATION? He's their father. Did he you people forget he left Britney with a toodler AND PREGNANT trying to be a failure superstar? And I don't understand how he doesn't work and still have a nanny AND a bodyguard to help with the kids. What is making him so occupied seriously? He's nothing but a freeloader.

We know we're living in a helpless world when Kevin Federline is called a wonderful parent. He makes all of us single parent who WORK to give our kids a better living and not depending on ill ex wive and supporting Shar Jackson with the money my ex wive give by buying Victoria Secrets stuff. GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!

Posted at 4:16PM on May 31st 2008 by Me

66. If you get a Free Ride on the Highway of Life, take it.

Posted at 5:06PM on May 31st 2008 by chicken stripper

67. "Me" needs to use spellcheck as "Me" can't speak or spell correctly!! Hope "Me"'s kids do get a better education and have a better life than "Me."

Posted at 5:21PM on May 31st 2008 by good for them

68. shouldn't he be busy causing Britney's car wrecks?

Posted at 6:57PM on May 31st 2008 by noiseslug

69. Kevin Federline isn't doing anything differently than Hollywood wives! They all live off their husbands money and raise the kids...for example so-so actress Kate Capshaw. She gave up her acting career when she married Steven Speilberg and raises their children (whom was married when they met and fell in love BTW). K-Fed's mistake was in allowing the media and Britney to push him to be more than just the successful back up dancer that he was when they met. He should have followed Chris Judd's path and just stayed true to himself and stayed a back up dancer and he wouldn't have made himself the national joke that he became. But he is doing nothing wrong as a celebrity ex...just because he happens to be male. And Tori Spelling completely supports her husband...

Posted at 10:43PM on May 31st 2008 by good for them

70. 14. He took care of these kids when Britney was incapable of doing so. If she has the financial means to provide him a home, she should happily do so and just be grateful he saved their kids.

Posted at 10:52AM on May 31st 2008 by Well...

*******************************************************************************************************************************************

HUH? He "took care of these kids when Brityney as incapable of doing so". Um, he is their father, right? Not only should he be "taking care of them he should be SUPPORTING them". Good thing Shar is capable of taking care of her/his kids alone - I don't think he want to spend his, um, well earned money (note sarcasm) to hire another wonderful nanny and bodyguard to take care of the other two. What kind of example is HE setting for all these kids? Loser.

Posted at 9:31PM on Jun 1st 2008 by HUH?

Previous 15 Comments