1. First

Posted at 7:59PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Jones-ing for Gossip

2. I really hope this couple can work it out.

Posted at 8:04PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Kelli

3. I guess he couldn't bring himself to say the word ,DIVORCE!some marriages work some don't ,life is not a bed of roses ,even for stars ,get bored in the relationship,sex becomes boring,stale,or lose intererst,for whatever reason,some people stay together just because they don't want too be alone and some have no problem with being alone,so Madonna sounds like she would rather be alone then be with someone just for the sake of being with someone ,that's more lonely I would think to be with someone just for the sake of not being alone,,so people their human beings just like you and me,and yes I'm a psychologist in training still in school, ,only difference is they have the paparazzi breathing down their backs 24/7 so the whole world knows their business,for better and worse.

Posted at 8:37PM on Jun 30th 2008 by studly

4. Oh ffs Studly, you are only an educated idiot. Partially educated if you are "in training". Keep your sermons to yourself. No one wants to read them

Posted at 9:08PM on Jun 30th 2008 by beth

5. This is probably the best thing that could have happened to guy...Madge is ragged out and hagged out...

Posted at 9:39PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Ashley

6. Dear Diddy,

The possibilities open to an elementary particle of Nature amount to everything compatible with the maintenance of some symmetry. The preservation of some global pattern in the face of all the local freedoms to change is equivalent to a conservation law of Nature and all laws of change can be re-expressed in terms of the invariance of some quantity. The particular patterns that are generated arise from the concatenation of a finite number of ingredients. For example, a collection of patterns might be created from a combination of rotations ans straight-line movements in space. The greater the number of distinct operations, or generators, that comprise the overall collection of patterns that can be generated, so the greater will be the number of patterns. If this number is very large, then for all practical purposes there will be no discernible symmetry at all. The generators of the symmetries that dictate the interactions that can occur between elementary particles are equivalent to the particles that mediate the force of Nature in question. Hence, the intelligibility of the world relies upon the fact that there are relatively few types of elementary particles. They are numbered in tens rather than in thousands or millions.

-John Barrow

Posted at 10:02PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Alberto Finestein

7. Guy is hot, but how 'bout that cutie with him......hey! Why didn't I think of it before?! Guy is gay and, well, Madge is gay also but Guy's got a brand now bromance going on. I hope that Madge's bro covers all this in his tell-all book.

Posted at 10:36PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Trevor

8. I have comments in response to studly and to beth.
To studly,the way you worded your comments, did you somehow think that people would wonder– because your observations were so insightful–if you were, in fact, a psychologist? Are you nuts? Perhaps you are training for some profession, but you just sound like an idiot in this forum. Your babble was difficult to read and you make no discernible point. If you are, as you say, in training, I suppose that means you are in college. I wonder, does your college not require English courses? Perhaps you should consider taking some of those and learning to communicate in writing before writing in a public forum to discuss your "insightful observations."
To beth: you referred to studly as an "educated idiot." Beth, you got it half right. You gave studly too much credit.

Posted at 11:23PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Joan Short

9. But, I will comment on the story, also. I agree with Kelli. I hope these people can work out their problems. I am always in favor of families staying together and finding happiness together, if possible. Best wishes to them.

Posted at 11:27PM on Jun 30th 2008 by Joan Short

10. being married to Madonna must take a really special person, well, opposites attract.

Posted at 11:48PM on Jun 30th 2008 by it must be hard !

11. I've sad it befor and I'll say it again...All you people who wish for others failures are SAD!!! You are pathetic individuals who live for watching entertainment shows like these. You have to criticize others because I'm sure your life is much better!!! I wonder how long your marriage would last if you were followed every day, every second with people constantly starting rumors about you. They seem like a normal married couple with real issues like all of us trying their best to work it out. Also, for all of those who think Madonna is an old hag..every female artist who is thriving today should bow at her feet including Janet, Mariah and everyone else because she was the first female who didn't take any sh.t and had the BALLS to stand up to the males in the music industry and did it like SHE wanted to and was never a puppet like all the female artist before her.

Posted at 2:00AM on Jul 1st 2008 by gdragong2

12. ONE OF THE BRIGHTEST WOMEN IN THE WORLD DID NOT HAVE A PRE NUP,GUESS THAT SHOWS HOW DUMB WOMEN ARE WHEN IT COMES TO LOVE

Posted at 2:18AM on Jul 1st 2008 by JULIE

13. NO PRE NUP,LOVE IS FOR EVER,SHE DOESNT NEED GOD TO SORT IT OUT SHE NEEDS TO TALK TO HER HUSBAND

Posted at 2:19AM on Jul 1st 2008 by JULIE

14. TMZ = STALKERS

And the world needs to know???!!!!

Posted at 7:45AM on Jul 1st 2008 by Oats

15. I don't believe for one minute she has no prenup. That is just a rumor. And it looks like this divorce talk is just a rumor, too. Madonna is an icon.She opened doors for women everywhere, and changed the music business. Like another poster said....many of the posters here just live for misery and it doesn't matter what a person does, they are gonna write horrible things about them. Sad.

Posted at 8:15AM on Jul 1st 2008 by Shame on you