Celebrity Justice
Brinkley's Ex -- A Real Jerk Off

Christie Brinkley's estranged husband Peter Cook sure likes his Internet porn -- spending about $3000 a month on the stuff.

Cook, who broke down crying after getting grilled on the stand today by the supermodel's lawyer, admitted he masturbated in front of a web cam and frequented escort, porn and swinger sites, all while married to Brinkley.

He also admitted that he had sex with then-teenager Diana Bianchi in his office while she worked for him. He testified he gave Bianchi nearly $300k hoping to keep their tryst on the down low. He said he would leave money for her under a rock outside his office and more cash behind a painting. He also said he bought her a $2000 watch and lingerie.

Attorneys for Brinkley have laid out a sordid story of Cook's history -- get a load of this stuff!

They've alleged, among other things, son Jack accidentally found porny pics of young girls on Cook's computer. The lawyers have also highlighted Cook's felony cocaine conviction and the time he served in jail.

Brinkley's lawyers say the 54-year-old hottie paid for everything during the marriage and learned of Cook's affair with Bianchi while giving the commencement speech at a local high school.

The former couple aren't fighting over cash, but over custody of their daughter Sailor and son Jack from her previous marriage, who Cook adopted.

Tags: Christie Briinkley, ChristieBriinkley, Internet Porn, InternetPorn, Peter Cook, PeterCook, Supermodel

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 7 of 16) Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

91. "Brinkley's lawyers say the 54-year-old hottie paid for everything during the marriage and learned of Cook's affair with Bianchi while giving the commencement speech at a local high school."

This loser doesn't even have his own money, so how can she be doing this for money. There is no money!

"The former couple aren't fighting over cash, but over custody of their daughter Sailor and son Jack from her previous marriage, who Cook adopted."

Kiddie porn addicts should be banned from going anywhere near children.

Posted at 6:40PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by just the facts

92. Man, heck w/ internet porn, you put C.B. in front of me and i'll beat off to her ALL DAY LONG! MILF!

Posted at 6:42PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by BabaGanoosh

93. Does the husband's fault (Mr. Cook) deprive him of a Claim to Alimony from the higher earning Christie Brinkley?

Did Cook''s admission of fault in the Marriage cause him to forfeit assets or income?

If the sole issue in this proceeding is to demonstrate that Husband is an "unfit parent" then this is not admissable and should not be considered by the Court.

Posted at 6:41AM on Jul 5th 2008 by Dominick

94. How many marriages does it take for you to figure it out? Pretty is as pretty does. Your nasty ass temper@ home doesn't fly. You pose a pretty picture. Tell the world to about how you can't paint. That Oliver broke up with you too. You were not dating when he died. Your new beau needs his background checked too. FYI. Tell Marj hi!

Posted at 6:46PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Duh Christie

95. Bruiser ~ You sound like a real prize. Obviously, you aren't married and have never been in a relationship in your pathetic life! Do you have a problem with liberated American women? Keep staring at that computer and whacking off because, that is about as close to a American woman you will ever come! You foreign nut case!

Posted at 6:45PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Dallas ~ a very liberated AMERICAN and damn proud of it

96. George...if you had ever bothered to research Joycelyn Elders, I think you would understand that whie she advocated for sexual education that included the discussion of masterbation. However, she never openly endorced a man spening $3000 a month and cheating on his wife with a girl who is barely legal. So maybe you shouldn't back up your argument of "normality" with the authority of a woman who is an actual intellecutal or you could maybe bother reading. Just a suggestion...

Posted at 6:46PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Beth

97. What is wrong with you people. Porn is NOT Normal for a forty or older man. It is fine if you are a young man and don't know what any thing really is and need an education. But for a man in his time of life it shows that he sick he has a real problem. To basically rape a young girl and give her money thats sick. There is NOTHING healthy about this mans sexal behavior. There is Nothing OK with this man and any man who would do what he has done. Thats the problem with men today they think Porn is normal and OK. Well it's not and if men want to have meanful relationships they need to be able to look at a real woman and like what they see NOT some air brushed BIMBO with a boob job to get off.

Posted at 6:54PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Peggy Jill

98. The love of a good woman is priceless. Let this be a lesson for all the guys who pursue the beautiful bitches. All that glitters is not gold.

Posted at 7:03PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Jack

99. Sorry ladies, if Peter cant be satisfied with Christy, none of us have a chance.

Posted at 6:59PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by linda K

100. OMG ... Your telling me her ( 4th ) husband didn't truly Love her ...OmG what a shocker !!! Give me a break

Posted at 6:58PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by jo

101. Christy, put him behind you and get on with it. His midlife crisis is not your fault.

Posted at 6:58PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by My Two Cents

102. I have to believe that their children already know about these things--I have heard all of it except maybe the amount he spent on porn. I'm guessing their friends or at least their parents have heard this too before now. I do think that having all this on TV and news papers and magazines will bring all this up again which will be painful to the children and may cause more teasing by their friends. I'm sure they had a lot of that already. That's what happens with a father with addiction issues.

With a felony cocain conviction, I'm guessing he had a cocain problem too. Called multi-level addictions. Pretty much never good for children to be around too much. Regardless of the publicity, the children should be with Christie as a primary parent. They could still have a relationship with their father, but be less influenced by his addictions. JMO

Posted at 7:01PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by QE2

103. isn't it funny that she has been married four times? So I guess looks aren't everything after all. If she was doing what she was supposed to maybe her husband(s) wouldn't go looking outside of the marriage for fulfillment. She must be a real BIYATCH because she can't seem to last for no more than 9 years with a spouse. So after airing all of her "dirty laundry" n television I hope she's just as embarassed as Peter is because she looks like a model who can't hold onto a man and keeps losing them to other women or porn.

Posted at 9:58AM on Jul 3rd 2008 by veryvuitton

104. To you men who have it your head that Christie should not have made this public WRONG>>>this should be known by the kids if it were your daughter he was jacking off to you might think differently. Young men need know what is right and what is wrong and when their own father can not show them how to be a good man then they should know what he is doing is wrong. Good Men of this world should stand-up because there are alot more of you out then are known and the guy who said that 75% of men look at porn is wrong. The percentage is more like 35% and there are a great deal of men out there that don't wast their time looking at porn but rather being good fathers and husbands, doing things that help teach their sons what is right and what ia wrong.

Posted at 7:20PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Peggy Jill

105. Addictive porn is not the same as sexy women/men viewing, it's linked to a heightened sense of exhibitionism/threat/psychiatric responses that are not healthy, and I think most would generally consider $3K a month to be above average. Further, an 18 year old, while legal, doesn't have the mental intellect to understand the situation; but a normal 40/50ish year old person does. The question is, what would a reasonable parent feel if it where their child. Not too good would be my guess.

As to Ms. Brinkley - everyone is speculating; who knows, maybe she just wants to reveal to the world that her ex-husband is a loose canon and (regardless of her children learning it, which they would do anyway somewhere in there lives), she wants full custody and is willing to expose her ex in order to meet her needs. I guess I, personally, don't blame her, his activities are not a sensible person's actions.

Posted at 7:20PM on Jul 2nd 2008 by Clinicallyspeaking

Previous 15 Comments | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments