Pregnant Man No Longer Pregnant!

Thomas Beatie -- the 34-year-old former woman turned transgendered pregnant man who went on Oprah -- has given birth to a biological girl.

We're hearing the whole thing was totally cloak and dagger. He checked into the hospital in Bend, Ore. under a fake name after going into labor early Monday morning and his room was sealed off, away from other expectant moms. The baby was delivered by C-section later that day.



Tags: thomas beatie, ThomasBeatie

Reader Comments

(Page 17 of 18) Previous 15 Comments | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

241. To #230: They are intolerant because they are scared of anything unfamiliar that they don't understand -- and because it feels so good to have that smug, superior feeling of being "right". I particularly enjoy the triumpantly hate-filled and judgmental comments from the evangelical Christians -- exactly why I converted to a more accepting and compassionate faith (Buddhism) many years ago.

Posted at 12:08PM on Jul 4th 2008 by Buddha Lady

242. Open Minded, I believe I am a butterfly, how can I convert to being just half of one those, the wing part, cause I still want to have a child, so I will keep those parts. PLEASE!!

Posted at 4:22PM on Jul 4th 2008 by I mean it.

243. Lady please do not call yourself a man. Check your DNA and call us back!!!!

Posted at 10:48PM on Jul 4th 2008 by Big Bear

244. Congratulations to Thomas and his wife on the birth of their baby. What a blessing for this little girl to be born to parents who wanted her so much that they were willing to put themselves through the scorn and ignorance of the general public to have her. To the post LuvmytransSon, I hope your son knows what an amazing mother and advocate he has in his corner.

Posted at 1:22AM on Jul 5th 2008 by L.E.

245. This child is going to be so confused and made fun of in high school. This is all kinds of wrong. I hear the doors of hell slowly creaking open.

Posted at 1:57AM on Jul 5th 2008 by Kat

246. I can already see this being made into a lifetime movie XD

poor gilr,,it sucks to be her. OMG what would you do if this was you mom??????

Posted at 2:47AM on Jul 5th 2008 by Robin

247. I can not believe that people are still calling her a man. Oprah should be ashamed for putting "her" into the spotlight. She would've fit better into Jerry Springer's show. She is a lesbian who happens to be having a baby...big deal. Lord..help that baby.

Posted at 4:29AM on Jul 5th 2008 by Pat

248. These two "women " created their own circus. Talk about missing the elephant in the room. Just because I say I'm a unicorn doesn't make me one. They are a gay couple in obvious need of acceptance and noteriety. I suspect they wouldn't mind a little financial gain from their little fantasy either. The people here are not hate-mongers just because they call it like it is.....SHE had a baby...big deal.

Posted at 4:38AM on Jul 5th 2008 by Pat

249. What is this world coming to when a supposed man, living in a woman’s body, can have a baby? Gay's cannot get married nor can they have children, case closed. It is ethically and morally wrong for them to get married and having a baby by any means is simply physically impossible (without genetic alterations)! By recognizing either we, as Americans and people in general, destroy the sanctity of marriage, human life, and love universally. I have no problem with gay's creating a binding "partnership" for legal applications, but I certainly do not feel that it should be recognized as anything else. We now, more than ever, need to uphold our morals and promote a better world for future generations. I don’t want to have to explain to my five year old why a self-proclaimed man just had a baby, do you? Happy Independence Day to all (gay or straight, lol)!

Regards,

FifthE1ement

Posted at 4:37AM on Jul 5th 2008 by FifthE1ement

250. What is this world coming to when a supposed man, living in a woman’s body, can have a baby? Gay's cannot get married nor can they have children, case closed. It is ethically and morally wrong for them to get married and having a baby by any means is simply physically impossible (without genetic alterations)! By recognizing either we, as Americans and people in general, destroy the sanctity of marriage, human life, and love universally. I have no problem with gay's creating a binding "partnership" for legal applications, but I certainly do not feel that it should be recognized as anything else. We now, more than ever, need to uphold our morals and promote a better world for future generations. I don’t want to have to explain to my five year old why a self-proclaimed man just had a baby, do you? Happy Independence Day to all (gay or straight, lol)!

Regards,

FifthE1ement

Posted at 4:39AM on Jul 5th 2008 by FifthE1ement

251. This person is not a man! She is lesbian who cut off her boobs and took some hormones to grow hair. She still has all her female parts and is therefore still a WOMAN!!! No man has ever given birth and no man ever will. So please, everyone just stop calling this wannabe a man!

Posted at 10:48AM on Jul 5th 2008 by Jaycee

252. This 'man' is not a man its a girl wanted to be man that never had her womb removed! How unnatural and confusing for this child...poor kid is goona have the same transgender issues to! SICK SICK SICK!

Posted at 12:27PM on Jul 5th 2008 by fred

253. 220. This is just the start of the craziness we've called normal in the world today. What's next? Sex with animals is just around the corner. Then since the ACLU defends child rapist sex with kids may not be to far off in the future. Don't forget in the liberals world actions without judgment is all they care about.

Posted at 12:44AM on Jul 4th 2008 by Lenn K.


He is right, the liberals are trying to create a new "normal" and "acceptable" where anything goes. God help us.

Posted at 6:13PM on Jul 5th 2008 by He is right

254. Just goes to show...women don't really need men (for anything). But someone keeps telling em they do, eh pretty muscles?

Posted at 5:46AM on Jul 6th 2008 by Supreme Court Jester

255. Why is it that some lesbians try their best to look like men? doesn't that defeat the entire purpose of being attracted to woman when they look like dudes? COULD YOU BE ANY MORE CONFUSING?!

Posted at 9:56AM on Jul 6th 2008 by Andrea

Previous 15 Comments | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments