Maddox Having a Jolie Ol' Time

31. A homewrecker is someone who wrecks a family home with children. Unlike Julia Roberts who stole Danny Moder when he had a wife and children or Tori Spelling who took a husband away from a wife and a father away from a child. When a another women gets between a children then she is a home wrecker. All Brad & Jen had was a piece of paper and no family...No Ties, No Problem....No homewrecking. Brad now has a real family.

Posted at 12:24PM on Jul 7th 2008 by g

32. Every woman wants to be Angelina? Did you take a poll or is this just your immature opinion?

Posted at 4:39PM on Jul 6th 2008 by blabs

33. Oh-that's how siblings greet each other in Europe? Great! Now, may I ask, WHAT EXACTLY DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THE VERY AMERICAN ANGELINA AND JAMES VOIGHT?

Posted at 5:23PM on Jul 6th 2008 by To Cokie

34. EVERY WOMAN WANTS TO BE ANGELINA?!?!?! Cokie, it's sad that you think women have such low standards and goals set for themselves. I'm sorry that your life is so demeaning that "being Angelina" is all you can conceiveably think of as a better life. Maybe that's the problem, your head is in the clouds and your judgement is flawed. Come back to earth. One way to do that, stop supporting a heroin addict. Enabler.

Posted at 5:37PM on Jul 6th 2008 by CLINIQUA

35. i am so glad to see angie brother there for her, you people need to learn to let things go after a while, so what, she kissed her brother, she was happy and she loves him, it was innocent, that was so long ago, he is not creepy, he is handsome, how would you like people talking about your relatives? good luck to this family, i love brad, he is gorgeous.

Posted at 7:41PM on Jul 6th 2008 by happy family

36. some people simply go on the Internet just to make up lies about people they don't even know, this lady have children, please prove to me how you know angelina, because you think that you are safe from prosecution, angelina is an inspiration for most people from all walks of life, she had problems like every one else, she never hide that, but sadly very few come out on the other end, asked people with love ones who did not, she has become more than her past, that's why she has millions of fans, people can relate to her.

Posted at 7:42PM on Jul 6th 2008 by liar

37. I can say I liked her BEFORE Brad Pitt was even on Angelina's radar! She was/is a great Actress. First saw her in both Gia and George Wallace. Then saw her in Girl, Interrupted and have seen every movie since then. So she has known addiction "in all forms". Most every person in this world has been or had someone they know, touched by a form of addiction. Atleast she has "recovered" from her addiction. I congratulate EVERY ONE who is able to overcome such an agonizing and horrific life situation like an addiction. And ooh, she wore Billy Bob's blood. It was a Crazay Life that made watching her so compelling! Her past, for me, is not a turn off! I think it shows a person who experienced a very full life at a very young (she was only 23 or 24 years old when she married Billy Bob people!) If Britney turns her life around and at 33 is traveeling the world with Sean Preston and Jayden James on behalf of the refugee and starving children of this orld, I will celebrate her big, turning her life around and being a humantarian ways just as I celebrate Angelina's. I don't believe any cheating took place. I don't believe she "stole" Brad and I don't believe Brad "cheated" on Jennifer. Based on everyone's accounts, Brad's, Angelina's, Jennifer's, Courteney's, and David's, THEY ALL SAY THE DIVORCE WAS IMMINENT AND THAT BRAD DID NOT CHEAT! Who is anyone else on this site to say otherwise??? The people who were actually involved in some form confirm that Angelina had nothing to do with the marriage ending and that Brad did not cheat on Jennifer. How much clearer does it have to be said for you people to get it thru your ULTRA-THICK SKULLS??
Are you really this dumb or do you just play dumb on TMZ?? Brad WANTS these babies! He has repeatedly said MORE!!! He said, three a year and so far, that's what they have given!! Angelina does not have his balls!! If anything, she is the one who caved in to him by giving him BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN when she VOWED never to have any. So, if anything, it is Brad who has Angelina's err, balls. I also personally find babies....well, they are ugly when they are first born by being three shades of purple and constantly changing color and covered in white muck...but after a week, that finally calms down and they become a beatiful baby. But, babies are boring! Baby's for the first 4-6 months, just sleep, eat and go to the bathroom! they are rather much like blobs! Sure, the first smile, the first gurgles...all that is thrilling, but they are still blobs. I prefer them, and my favorite for all children, are from about 9 months through 3 years when they are really growing into their own and everything is new and they are learning! What an absolutley fantastic age of life. But, I will be buying the magazine to look at the photos of the beautiful blobs when they arrive. I look forward to seeing the "interaction" of the parents with eachother, with the new babies, and with all the other children to their parents and to the new additions. And all families that choose to have alot of kids, like 6 - 10...are all of them raising miserable children who hate their siblings as people are saying how the Jolie-Pitt kids must feel? Please, don't even try to speak for people you do not know and will not know. If they write a "Mommy Dearest" book when they grow up, then you all my gloat and say, "told you so." Until then, this, by all appearances, is one big happy family!! Best wishes to all, even if they are husband stealing and adultering skanks!!

Posted at 9:25PM on Jul 6th 2008 by Your Ad Here!

38. Actually 9:25P, David Arquette DID INDEED say that ANGELINA JOLIE WAS THE REASON FOR THE DEMISE OF THE PITT MARRIAGE. He divulged such on Howard Stern. Howard asked, "Were there problems before or was Angelina Jolie the problem?" To which David replied, "Well let's just say there were no problems until Angelina Jolie".! GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT, ROBOT!

Posted at 10:37PM on Jul 6th 2008 by Suck It

39. I listened to the Howard Stern show myself and I heard David Arquette say the divorce was INEVITABLE! So, according to the fact that I heard him say, I am right. I did not hear him say that the divorce was solely due to Angelina Jolie at all!! And I even listened to the clips repeated on all the entertainment news shows and I never once heard him state that there were not problems in the marriage until Angelina Jolie. Get the transcript....or post where I may go to read it and I will be happy to see for myself that in fact he stated that...and that he wasn't making a joke...that he didn't say it in a mocking manner. That's why I'd rather hear the actual tape as well. Okay...guess I have some research to do...but I stand by what I HEARD DAVID ARQUETTE SAY AND NOT SAY ON HOWARD STERN> Remember, Howard Stern is played for laughs also!! I am definitely not a robot...free thinker here!!!

Posted at 11:16PM on Jul 6th 2008 by Your Ad Here!

40. Okay, I did look up the transcript and the transcript clearly shows the (laughs) in paranethesis as he was making all the statements...which clearly suggests that he was playing it for humor. He was JOKING that Angelina Jolie was the cause for the split and that the marriage would have survived if it hadn't been for Angelina. Again, said with a (laugh) and then he immediately says, "No, the divorce was inevitable."Not followed by the (laugh). But he does say the relationship with Angelina Jolie was a surprise to all of them when the pictures of them in Africa surfaced, but I find that particulary hard to buy, seeing as Jennifer herself in Vanity Fair in the "Jen Speaks Out" issue clearly stated that Brad was honest with her about his feelings for Angelina Jolie. So what I want to know is WHY was it so surprising then to the three of them that once Jennifer and Brad did split up, that he did get together with Angelina? Was Jennifer and Co. convinced that Angelina Jolie would not be with Brad Pitt? It is a very curious thing indeed for her to know her then-husband had developed very strong feelings for Angelina Jolie and him telling her of his feelings...and then for her to turn around AFTER they seperated and to be completely shocked that Brad then got into a relationship with Ms. Jolie? Yep...this thing just gets curiouser and curiouser...and you should really know better than to take anything on Howard Stern as anything but a joke! Lighten up...this is celebrity gossip!! Who is acting the robot?? Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have been the butt of many of Clooney's jokes and obviously took David's comments as the jokes they were intended to be. If he hadn't been joking, do you really believe Brad Pitt would have stood by and let that slide? That is the mother of his children, whether you people like it or not, and he will defend her honor if he really felt it necessary and does so all the time anyway by saying there is no other woman who he could have asked for to be a better mother to his children...now that IS a total dis to Ms. Jennifer Aniston. *SNAP*

Posted at 12:01AM on Jul 7th 2008 by Your Ad Here!

41. To: Your Ad here!

LOVE your posts!!!

Posted at 6:23AM on Jul 7th 2008 by Progressive

42. So you heard it AND you still don't believe it? Ahhh, well then, that would qualify you as A LOONY!

BTW STERN RULES-AND YOU CLEARLY don't know A THING about H-O-W-A-R-D! Don't EVEN pretend that you do. True fans WOULD NEVER say everything on Stern is a joke especially since he was THE FIRST ONE to blame the Twin Towers on Osama Bin Laden-some joke, Robot.

Posted at 10:15AM on Jul 7th 2008 by To ROBOT

43. Angelina Jolie, James Haven and Jon Voight are all very creepy! Who cares if she has twins today or next year. Who cares how many kids she has, what kind of mother is she, now that's what important. From all the things I've seen, not a very good one. Children being moved from town to town, school to school, country to country. They never adjust well! All of these children they are having and adopting will be just more celebrity children messes! And the kiss between Angekina and her brother was a long kiss and was certainly not a normal kiss between siblings! Jennifer Aniston is better off without Pitt the cheater.

Posted at 10:48AM on Jul 7th 2008 by cj1973

44. Yeah! We all agree that Jennifer Aniston is better off without Brad!!
And am truly glad to NOT be considered one of Howard Stern's fans...But I did say I JUST READ THE TRANSCRIPT FROM TAHT SHOW AND DAVID ARQUETTE IS CLEARLY, per the shows official transcript, MAKING JOKES ABOUT ANGELINA JOLIE BEING THE CAUSE OF THE SPLIT WITH all the (laughter) throughout his statements. That is NOT the same thing as saying I have read it and don't believe it. I am saying I have read it and see that he was clearly making jokes when he said it. OOOOHHHHH, and Howard Stern REALLY FIRST REPORTED OSAMA BIN LADEN AND IF IT HADN'T BEEN FOR HIS REPORT, the CIA, FBI, and the WORLD would have no idea WHO was responsible for 9-11??? Really??? You seriously give all the credit to Howard Stern for "outing" Osama Bin Laden??? Then why doesn't he go over to Afganistan and pull him out of the cave he is living in since the dang government can't find him but the Hero, Howard Stern, has all the inside sccop!! Yeah...and I'm the ROBOT and LOON??!! Sorry I don't worship at the feet of Howard Stern and use him as my official news source!! He is, and has not been, a relevent social commentator in this country for a long time!

Posted at 12:17PM on Jul 7th 2008 by Your Ad Here!

45. Oh, and I have also read in the FINANCIAL JOURNALS that the sole reason for satellite radio's serious financial woes is due to Howard Stern's ridiculous contract. That, not only doesn't he have the audience he once had, but more importantly, he doesn't bring in the advertising revenue he used to! But, thanks to savvy negotiating, Howard Stern will be around for a very long time making mega bucks, even if he alone kills satalite radio! Hey, with all the accolades and credit you give him, you must be the idiot who signed him up on that killer deal and have since been canned for not doing your research properly to see that Howard Stern is even less relevant than Don Imus...and we all see how his career has been going! Its just that Howard has a rock solid contract and they can't get rid of him!!

Posted at 12:18PM on Jul 7th 2008 by Your Ad Here!