McConaughspawn -- Three Million Dollar Baby

Matthew McConaughey's lil' bundle of joy will be making Matt a big bundle of jack.

Our spies tell us OK! mag will shell out $3 mil for the first pics of young Levi, who was just born Monday night. And that's not all -- we're told that the deal includes baby's first Christmas as well.

We also hear OK! gets first right to the pics of the wedding if Matt and Cam get married -- though they'll have to pay extra for those snaps.

Tags: Matthew McConaughey, MatthewMcconaughey

Relevant Posts

Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 4) Previous 15 Comments

46. Qoute:"1. $3 million dollars for a PICTURE of a BABY... when there are homeless and hungry children everywhere. People wonder why so many foreigners hate our country."

They hate the US for many more reasons..how about a senseless war by a completely brain dead retard like Bush..there is your reason. These pictuures are worth it... all these dopes worrying about "starving orphans world wide and the press pays this???"
WHO FRIGGING CARES.
The bigger issue connected to those starving orphans is whay do they continue to have kids they can't afford?
More shirtless pictures please.

Posted at 8:37PM on Jul 9th 2008 by 12InchFashionModel

47. What a waste of 3 million dollars. What, only 30 people on here actually want to see the fotos!! OK! Magazine didn't do their homework about nobody being interested in this kid and wasted money they could have put toward the Jolie-Pitt pic kiddie!!

Posted at 9:00PM on Jul 9th 2008 by Your Ad Here!

48. this "typical brazilain money ho" played it right..get knocked up and get ready for $$$$$$. she's ugly!
if this dumbass is somewhat of a "Real" Texas man, he'll help out American children while exposing his own.,,WHIPPED~~~and no longer a real Texas man!!!!!

Posted at 9:13PM on Jul 9th 2008 by poobear

49. If these celebs feel that they MUST pimp out their infants, then 20% (at least) of the amount paid for any celebrity's baby's picture should be taken right off the top and donated to a children's charity. The celebs can choose the charity but that should be standard boilerplate in the contract of the tabloids, celeb websites, what have you... If not, than the practice of giving these celebs millions more over their already overpaid salaries just because they had a kid while there are starving and sick children in the world - well, that DOES borders on the obscene.
I don't like Matty too much any more, anyway. He's friendly with Owen Wilson yet screwed him over TWICE recently - by taking over his role in "Tropic Thunder" when Owen had to drop out because of the "incident" and second, by introducing Lance to Kate so soon after the second Kate and Owen breakup. And don't tell me it's all Owen's fault because he rides the needle. That's probably true but Matty is an alkie-in-training, bongo-playing pothead! He's no angel, but I do hope that he's a good father to his sweet little boy!!

Posted at 10:52PM on Jul 9th 2008 by Pimp Your Baby Out!!!

50. 1. $3 million dollars for a PICTURE of a BABY... when there are homeless and hungry children everywhere. People wonder why so many foreigners hate our country.

Posted at 1:08PM on Jul 9th 2008 by hmmm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ease up gloom & doom, we give billions to other countrys, we help more starving people on this planet then all other nations, so if they dislike us they need to send it back.
Get a back bone and some pride !

Posted at 11:45PM on Jul 9th 2008 by Kelly

51. Very true. No country has helped the hungry more then the United States. Lets not forget, Jolie donates her kids "pic" money to charity. Not every celeb has their heads in the clouds.

Posted at 8:08PM on Jul 10th 2008 by my2cents

52. Seriously, when is this baby-pimping trend gonna end? When Larry Birkhead and Jamie Lynn get multi-million dollar "deals," you know it's gone too far.

Posted at 4:27PM on Jul 24th 2008 by NoodleMonkey

53. I really don't care about seeing his baby, but I would love to see him naked!!!! YEEEEEEHAWWWWWW!!!!!

Posted at 9:47AM on Jul 13th 2008 by ktluvspink

54. matthew makes me sick..he s a little pip squeak and the only reason that broad had that baby was to pimp the baby per matthew not her...shes in love with a creek and he is not sexy to me..he s ickie.. he wont marry anybody as he has no morals or values..she is lovely and I hope she finds a nice guy

Posted at 3:40PM on Jul 16th 2008 by Cara

Previous 15 Comments