Larry B: I Did Not Have Sex With That Man

286. 283. 282. what a bunch of HOGWASH. swims , stop trying to REwrite history. the facts speak for themselves and you cannot change them..

Posted at 11:56AM on Jul 30th 2008 by say what
*****
I have consistently written about and analyzed the facts of this case as they became available. When I reiterate the well known facts of this case, I always assume everyone else has been following along.

Maybe you could list where I have altered or 'rewritten' any facts or time-lines in my posts?


Posted at 2:53PM on Jul 30th 2008 by Only swim in the Ocean

Another antinoid that lacks the ability to communicate normally or debate effectively. Sore loser in other words

Posted at 6:52PM on Jul 30th 2008 by surviving on anger not good for the soul

287. At this point we don't know whose hand was on the other end of that fatal last swig, but we do know know how those drugs got there.

WILL ANYONE be held responsible for that "accidental overdose?" Anna? oh yha, that's right she was a "druggie."

IMO- Anna had her very own DRUG DEALER(S) living with her under her roof, they even traveled with her.

I think that Dr. E should have been held accountable for her role in SUPPLYING those HUGE concoctions of perscription DRUGS. Don't we have LAWS to punish professionals after such negligent behavior? WHY is Law Enforcemenit ignoring this? WHY haven't criminal charges been filed?

IT'S PITIFUL THE WAY THAT GROUP GOT AWAY WITH FACILITATING ANNA'S DEATH!

THEY were the educated ones and they took advantage of Anna, in essence they beat her at her own game. Anna was proud of being a good con, but she did NOT deserve to be dehumanized so and over-medicated to the point of DEATH.

IMO- They had to drug her to silence her because her voice was SO STRONG!

Now Anna "doth protest no more."

And THEY walk away with ALL OF ANNA'S BELONGINGS!... The Estate, The Baby, The Homes, The Likeness, etc...

Ridiculous!.... RE FRIGGIN DIC U LOUS!

Posted at 8:10PM on Jul 30th 2008 by PWF

288. I so agree with you PWF--with everything you said!
I fear Jerry Brown won't pursue the investigation- that was suppose to be going on--What happened with that?--Did Dr. K.E. get back all the things they took? Never charged her for crap--? Case closed ,uh? hmmmm.......
(are the other ladies still in the cave?

Posted at 11:06PM on Jul 30th 2008 by Sana

289. PWF i agree with all you stated. professionals rook total advantage of anna for many years. They IMO not only facilitated her death but they persued it . Nothing i have ever seen or read has changed my mind on the first thought i had in this whole sad saga..and thats that the lawyer did it..not one thing he has said or done and many things he has NOT done have convinced me otherwise so im sticking to that until cali ends their investigation. I just pray its on the up n up this time. My opinion of hks and co. was formed soley by their own actions. not by rita, mr oquinn, mr mccabe, wilma , virgie , the hattens , ford shelley etc etc etc but by them themselves..their actions speak so much louder than their words...i do wish cali and jerry brown would "sh*t or get off the pot" so to speak, but i also do believe this is so deep and entangled it might take a long time to unravel the whole thing. This is as always JMO. given to me compliments of HKS himself and the rest.

Posted at 12:17AM on Jul 31st 2008 by say what

290. EVICT, DISBAR, REVOKE and Charge, Please!...



EVICT, DISBAR, REVOKE and Charge, Please!...

Posted at 12:25AM on Jul 31st 2008 by PWF (NO more money and power for Howie, please)

291.
288. PWF i agree with all you stated. professionals rook total advantage of anna for many years. They IMO not only facilitated her death but they persued it . Nothing i have ever seen or read has changed my mind on the first thought i had in this whole sad saga..and thats that the lawyer did it..not one thing he has said or done and many things he has NOT done have convinced me otherwise so im sticking to that until cali ends their investigation. I just pray its on the up n up this time. My opinion of hks and co. was formed soley by their own actions. not by rita, mr oquinn, mr mccabe, wilma , virgie , the hattens , ford shelley etc etc etc but by them themselves..their actions speak so much louder than their words...i do wish cali and jerry brown would "sh*t or get off the pot" so to speak, but i also do believe this is so deep and entangled it might take a long time to unravel the whole thing. This is as always JMO. given to me compliments of HKS himself and the rest.

Posted at 12:17AM on Jul 31st 2008 by say what

...............................


You are one crude megalomaniac, seek help before your obsessionional personailty creates human combustion within you.

The law is the law and is not based on emotive nonsense, but by clear evidence, none of which you or your ilk appear to absorb or understand!

Your many monikers are easy to define on this site as you/they are unable to debate effectually, never offer any facts or evidence, just maniacal outbursts of attacks on anyone who offers the truth, facts and evidence, which you refuse to accept.

Enough of your schizoid self opinionated outbursts which do not relate to the facts or evidence. If you are so sure or your gut reaction, then provide the proof to the authorities and stop your blasting on this site, for those of us who only relate to the proof and truth!! ENOUGH

Posted at 2:02AM on Jul 31st 2008 by saint james

292.

Tmz is blocking my posts . Just thought you should know that . Whenever a Justice Seeker speaks the hard truth and the powers that be don't like it , they just block you . Eff yourselves you morons , won't be back again , these stern supports are all REALLY STUPID Twits , who have no life just hope.

Posted at 2:23AM on Aug 1st 2008 by Upside Down Girl

293. tmz used to ban us for our opinions and thoughts. i guess they've changed the mo to stopping your posts. thats probably because larry and harvey are buddies. otherwise how would harvey even know about larrys 10 hour depo when no one else did......tmz pray tell....

Posted at 10:06AM on Aug 2nd 2008 by say what

294. Interesting parallel with the ANS Doctors' case and the excesses of the DEA in the Heath Ledger case:

http://www.tmz.com/2008/08/07/d-e-a-what-were-they-smoking

• How much CA taxpayer money has been wasted by the CA AG's Office pursuing someone/anyone to blame for accidental drug OD deaths in another State or Country?
• How much taxpayer money has been used to hook into a high-profile story just to promote one's own fame and fortune and political agenda?
• How are the Patients and Physicians of CA coping within an environment where their own State Government openly slams the heavy hand of Law Enforcement on them because of out-of-state agitators and their imaginary and salacious claims?

Now would be a good time to get an update on the ANS Doctors' story.

Posted at 4:28PM on Aug 8th 2008 by Only swim in the Ocean

295. More Big News for People Who Closely Follow The ANS Story.

Dateline: August 7, 2008. Fort Lauderdale, FL, U.S. District Judge William P. Dimitrouleas, in the Matter of HKS v. O'Q

O'Q sought to have HKS's Lawsuit for defamation and false light invasion of privacy dismissed for failure to state a claim and the Judge has denied this motion. The Judge addressed all of O'Q's reasons that the lawsuit be dismissed and denied them all, one by one. O'Q had six reasons for dismissal (quote from the Judge's decision):

"In their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants (O'Q and his Law Firm) argue that the entire Amended Complaint should be dismissed. Defendants argue that the Plaintiff (HKS) fails to state a claim because: (1) Florida’s litigation privilege bars all of Plaintiff’s defamation claims; (2) O’Quinn’s statements were nondefamatory as a matter of law, because they were pure opinion and/or rhetorical hyperbole; (3) Plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege actual malice; (4) the Florida Supreme Court has never formally endorsed the validity of a cause of action for false light invasion of privacy; (5) joint and several liability is precluded by the invalidity of the Plaintiff’s slander and false light claims; and finally (6) Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages fails because the Plaintiff cannot show actual malice. The Court will address each argument in turn."

As a reminder here is what the Judge wrote as the gist of what O'Q said to the media during the FL Hearing in Seidlin's Court and the basis for HKS's lawsuit:

“Stern is a despicable person worthy of public scorn and contempt, falsely stating that he engaged in a number of crimes and other violent, unsavory and disreputable acts, including, but not limited to, criminal involvement in the death of Daniel Smith; criminal involvement in the death of Ms. Smith; and kidnapping Dannielynn for ransom.”

• These are the preposterous claims that O'Q's bloggers still insist were and are true.

• O'Q himself has said he was making it all up just to level the playing field for his client, VA, in the 'court of public opinion'.

Of the six reasons O'Q pleaded to the Court to dismiss HKS's lawsuit, these are the interesting ones to me:

- O'Q claimed to the Court that any reasonable person would know he was just involved in 'rhetorical hyperbole' (translation: blowing hot air). The Judge disagreed however. The Judge wrote that O'Q implied he had 'non-public' information, possibly from his own investigations in FL, when he made these statements that could very well have caused people to think he was providing opinion based on facts only he knew. Of course, the mere existence of O'Q's BFF bloggers and their websites negates the validity of O'Q's claims that no one would reasonably think anything he said was true (under the bus they go).

- O'Q also claimed the privilege of immunity that Attorneys have IN COURT extends outside the building when talking to the media. The Judge disagreed. The Judge wrote that O'Q's statements about HKS murdering ANS and Daniel and kidnapping DL had nothing to do with the matters at hand in Seidlin's Court at the time and therefore were not protected by a 'litigation privilege'.

- O'Q also claimed that HKS had not provided an adequate claim of actual malice by O'Q. Quoting the Judge's Decision again:

"However, as discussed more fully above, because the Court finds that the Plaintiff (HKS) has adequately alleged actual malice at this point in the proceedings, the Defendants’ (O'Q and his Law Firm) Motion to Dismiss on this grounds must be denied."

The other claims and reasons for their denial can be read in the Judge's decision.

Recall, Cosby used only O'Q's people (and the MIA wacko Jackie Hatten) as sources, and her book (separate lawsuit) reiterated all that O'Q said back then. O'Q has retracted his defamatory claims hoping for mercy from the Court (denied) but Cosby still stands by her book. Cosby has been hung out to dry by O'Q as the only person (besides his bloggers) still claiming O'Q's lies are legitimate.

What will Cosby do now? The level of desperation must be intense now; stage another 'nannygate' or throw herself on Judge Chin's mercy claiming special privileges for media-whores?

And for some bloggers who insist on reading only what Judges say, and only if they are posted on certain websites, here's a link to this decision for you:

http://annanicoleandhowardkstern.com/080808_Stern_vs_OQuinn_156.pdf

Posted at 4:17PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Only swim in the Ocean

296. Lucky
AOL

~snip~


Maybe the reason some of you will not go to TMZ is, maybe some of you are banned and can't go back.

If you spam and off topic this one, you might as well do ALL the rest of them as well.

Any news if Larry depo will be sealed or not? TIA


Look Luckless...not banned. Idiot.

Posted at 6:27PM on Aug 10th 2008 by Luckless is a fool

297. Not banned.....just bored.....lol

Posted at 7:05AM on Aug 11th 2008 by Dink

298. O'Q Continues To Amuse - Dateline: 08/11/2008

O'Q has filed an Appeal. Not of his recently denied Motion for Dismissal for Failure to State a Claim (denied 08/07/08), but his earlier denied Motion asking for Dismissal based on lack of Personal Jurisdiction. One wonders if he will call for a review of everything the U.S. District Judge decides.

- O'Q rehashs his original Motion essentially stating that the Judge misinterpreted case law. Much like we see his bloggers do, O'Q more than once states that the case law the Judge cited to support his decision to dismiss O'Q's Motion actually supports granting his motion! Chutzpah!

- O'Q even strangely suggests that the case be moved to CA for the convenience of HKS's anticipated witnesses since most live there. O'Q claims all the FL witnesses HKS lists are not important except one, Dr. Perper. O'Q says the First Responders, Police, Detectives etc. that HKS lists are irrelevant because Dr. Perper wrote the definitive doc ument about ANS (his autopsy report) that includes all the information that those people collectively know. What a shock this will be to his bloggers!

- And yes, O'Q throws in yet again his belief that no reasonable person listening to his 'rhetorical hyperbole' would have believed he was expressing factual information. Recall, he made this claim in the Motion that was denied August 7 and the Judge very specifically addressed it and denied it. At that time. the Judge stated O'Q clearly suggested that his views expressed on TV shows were based on 'inside information' not available to the public and possibly from his own FL investigations conducted by Clark/Wilma. No wonder O'Q suddenly remembered who Wilma was and doesn't want her deposed!

Anyway, http://annanicoleandhowardkstern.com/081108_Stern_vs_OQuinn_158.pdf is the nineteen pages of circular reasoning that won't help O'Q.

HKS still has a pending Motion asking the Court to order O'Q to comply with discovery in this case. Seems O'Q has turned over basically nothing to HKS. O'Q is claiming 'everything' is an 'Attorney Work Product' not subject to discovery including among many things, the Clark/Wilma investigation.

Well, the Clark/Wilma investigation is all in Cosby's book. Cosby is more likely to crack before O'Q gives up filing mountains of paperwork, which of course, will render all that effort moot.

Posted at 3:55AM on Aug 13th 2008 by Only swim in the Ocean

299. ...
HKS still has a pending Motion asking the Court to order O'Q to comply with discovery in this case. Seems O'Q has turned over basically nothing to HKS. O'Q is claiming 'everything' is an 'Attorney Work Product' not subject to discovery including among many things, the Clark/Wilma investigation.

Well, the Clark/Wilma investigation is all in Cosby's book. Cosby is more likely to crack before O'Q gives up filing mountains of paperwork, which of course, will render all that effort moot.

Posted at 3:55AM on Aug 13th 2008 by Only swim in the Ocean
*****
UPDATE: Court Clears the Way to Get the Show On The Road

Yesterday U.S. District Judge William P. Dimitrouleas, in the Matter of HKS v. O'Q issued a Consent Protective Order for Confidential and Highly Confidential Information, agreed to by Wood and McCabe.

Either Party in this lawsuit can now mark docu_ments or deposition material as either Confidential or Highly Confidential if it contains personal or financial or proprietary (like Attorney Work Product) information and be protected against any of that material being used whole or in part in other Court filings, media releases, books, etc. At the conclusion of the lawsuit, all such marked material must be returned to the originating party and removed from all electronic databases.

If any information was necessary to be used in another lawsuit for instance, express written permission of the other party must be obtained first. This would prevent, as an example, using a deposition of say, Wilma in the O'Q case, by Wood in the Cosby lawsuit unless O'Q/McCabe agreed to its use in advance. Recall, Judge Chin in the Cosby defamation lawsuit was upset that Wood used part of Cosby's deposition in another lawsuit and her deposition leaked to the media.

So, O'Q no longer has a leg to stand on as he has refused so far to hand over discovery materials to HKS or allow important depositions to occur.

Posted at 5:32PM on Aug 14th 2008 by Only swim in the Ocean

300. swims..you are so full of sh*t i bet when you burp it smells like poopoo....save your crap for a court near you, joe blow ain't buying it...

Posted at 12:39PM on Aug 17th 2008 by say what