Britney's Piece Still Hot

46. I like to add, that, after overcoming the custody case in a painful manner, a second barrier has build
up to her, totally unexpactable, in form of the conservatorship.
She may not believe it, but the main sense is to force her to take neuroleptical medical drugs -
even as a rich and famous superstar.
Psychiatrists and the and pharma industry are so crude brute in this question, that it
is not comparable to almost any other technical-medical-scientific high evolved profession.
The juridical sphere plays the game in favour of neuroleptics, as if it would gain a lot.
It does.
You can discipline anyone with a medical disorder diagnosis without any bad behavior or the tiniest criminal delict at any time in any form you like.
That is a possibility to an great abuse of power, that you have to have very strong morals
to withstand this temptation.
Remember that the brain is the most imporant part of your body and the main seat of your soul
A state sanctioned and industrial working shrinking of the personality and the luck of
people.
This in a country, whose main proud is to be the home of individual freedom?????
Today our valuable Mrs. Britney Spears - tomorrow or the week after - you yourself!!!!!

Posted at 7:26AM on Jul 25th 2008 by Harald Wenk (Dr. rer. Nat.)

47. 43.
I don't expect to her to have any custody for years to come. They're giving her increased visitation, I think, as a form of therapy, but this visitation will also continued to be monitored.

They're addressing the issue of the conservatorship in just a week. Whether or not it remains in place, will be a good indication of what her mental state is. Didn't Kevin's camp say that if the conservatorship ends that there will be a court appointed monitor present for the kid's visits?

I'm not getting into the argument if her problem is drugs, personality disorders, or mental illness because I believe that all 3 are probably present. It is well known that drug abuse actually changes the chemistry of the brain, so this is entirely plausible.



Posted at 9:32PM on Jul 24th 2008 by DIANE T in TX

DIANE T in TX, I'm not really sure what you are getting at. Responding to those who I saying that "she gave her children up", I did say she did not have chance in helll of regaining any kind of custody now. I said that I, for one, believe the her GOAL "in the future" is to gain at least 50% custody of the children and that she has a lot to prove between now and then. So, are we in agreement there?

As far as the c-ship, I do not believe that it will end at the end of July. I hope it doesn't. From what I read, and I obviously have no personal knowledge of what is really going on with the entire situation, she isn't ready to be on her own yet. I do believe that under the c-ship she is making progress. I do believe that working is good for her. It isn't your typical 9-5 job - it is doing something that she loves. If she can regain her self-respect and stick to a very grueling "work" schedule while continuing to work out and get back in shape, I believe that is all good. Even if her visition rights with the boys are monitored, I beleive she has them 40% of the time (again, only something I read), which, again, is good for her and the boys.

So, again, I'm not sure what you were getting at by responding to my comment.

Posted at 8:58AM on Jul 25th 2008 by Is There Anyone There?

48. What a joke. There is no reason for c-ship, just your stupid jealous conniving selfish ass, WANTING what you used to have, before K-Fed.

Posted at 4:00PM on Jul 25th 2008 by yeh yeh