Cops Say Shia "Not At Fault" for Crash

31. Only in LA can you be drunk and driving and the police blame the other driver in the accident. In the real world, when you are drunk and behind the wheel, you are automatically responsible. The police in LA are simply ridiculous. If I were the person in the other car, I would fight this to the Supreme Court to showcase how ridiculous the police in LA are.

Posted at 3:49PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Glen

The other driver blew a red light so yes he/she caused the accident with that said I can't stand ppl that drink and drive and what's worse these celebs have the money for a driver. Yes LA cops are ridiculous you are right on about that.

Posted at 3:58PM on Jul 29th 2008 by boycott x17 idiots

32. Did I miss where it says that he is off the hook? Yeah I didn't think so. They are only saying that he is not at fault from the actual accident- as in he didn't turn in front of someone to cause collision. Like someone said above, calm down and wait for the facts.

Posted at 3:58PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Chris

33.
there's always a minor tremor when the

newly inflated vince vaughn rides his bike.........

Posted at 3:59PM on Jul 29th 2008 by william suff

34. He's too hot to go to jail anyway.

Posted at 4:09PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Lis

35. Great... DRUNK and not at fault. Oh thant's right.. I forgot he was a celebrity. Maybe the earthquake hit him in the azz.

Posted at 4:05PM on Jul 29th 2008 by DarkKnight

36. Of course he is not at fault! HELLO! He is a celeb!! Celeb's get away with murder (remember O.J.?)

It does not matter if he was drunk. He will get away with it. Every celeb does!

Posted at 4:17PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Beth

37. How about you wait until all the facts come out before you hang him. He might not have been drunk. If I flipped my truck I might have been a little bit punched drunk. He was probably disorientated, and in shock. If you don't know the facts shut up.

Posted at 4:39PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Gina

38. He should go to jail for his name alone. Gross.

Posted at 5:45PM on Jul 29th 2008 by R.Zimmerman

39. Well, the way I see it, his intoxication has still not been proven. Let's wait to see the blood test first. I mean, first we hear he's turning left illegally and runs into a car to now having the other party running a red light and causing the accident. Shouldn't it be logical to get all the results before spuing all this bile! America really has a problem with hate. Just read these forums! Geesh!

Posted at 4:43PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Free Spirit

40. First, HAHA to everyone that judged instantly.

But second, I agree that drunk is drunk.

Third, did the other car also drive drunk? Did Shia have the green arrow, or how did the 'left in front of oncoming' turn into 'they ran a red light' ?

Posted at 4:55PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Memememe

41.

Drunk-driving
is
drunk-driving
is
drunk-driving
is
drunk-driving
is ...

Posted at 4:58PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Have Another Little Drinky-Poo

42. No one knows if he was drunk or not! Wait for the facts!

Posted at 5:23PM on Jul 29th 2008 by ShiaFan143

43. I don't think that saying he wasn't "at fault" for the accident is meant to imply that he won't be prosecuted for being under the influence. I think it was just to infer that the cause of the accident itself was the fault of the other driver for running the red light when Shia had the right of way. Shia could technically sue for negligence (as could his passenger) because of this. Not that it will matter because he will be sued by the driver who hit him. That's going to be a nightmare of a lawsuit!

Posted at 7:15PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Jen

44. I thought fault flew out the window when one of the driver's was intoxicated...the drunk one is deemed at fault siimply because he's under the influence. Don't drink and drive!

Posted at 5:44PM on Jul 29th 2008 by Annie

45. Nobody knows if he was drunk or not. Wait for the facts before you condemn him.

Posted at 6:01PM on Jul 29th 2008 by RAw