31. I have to laugh at all the lowlifes that comment on here!!! The only reason they make negative comments is that their own lives are nothing. This gives them the chance to be someone at their keyboard. Just admit you are strictly loser lowlifes period!!! PS- Maybe your mother still loves you, but I doubt cause she knows your trash too!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted at 2:25PM on Aug 5th 2008 by lowlifes

32. #23,
Beg to differ w/ ya, hon! I guess everyone's different. I'm petite, 5'3" and in shape. I gained 40(!) pounds when all was said and done -- with my first child. And I did not eat everything in sight, believe me. I looked just like Gwen above. Most uncomfortable time of my life. And when my daughter popped out, lo and behold, she was a little thing at 6 lbs. 9 ounces. You just never know.

Posted at 2:26PM on Aug 5th 2008 by LeeLee

33. GWEN STEFANI ROCKS! I love her music and she can rock. She has great style. She is carrying a healthy baby actually for what I think is great. As far as Nicole Kidman I don't know her personally ofcourse but shes very tall and slim and it was her first pregnancy so she wasn't going to show as much because of her body type. Not necessarily because she was not eating. Every pregnancy is different. GWEN ROCKS

Posted at 2:27PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Baby on Board

34. She looks perfectly normal and wonderful for the final month...as I am right there with her and ready for this baby. For everyone else that has nothing nice to say--I am sorry for you and take a good look at yourselves...you must be jealous! I hope none of you negative people have a child to pass down your bitterness/shallowness.

Posted at 2:27PM on Aug 5th 2008 by right there with her

35. Wow #31 you posted a negative comment on this website, ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh does that make you a low life too?

just a wondering because I posted a positive comment mostly because today is a slow day and I was reading up.

HAVE A GREAT DAY************

Posted at 2:32PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Baby on Board

36. At first sight, I thought it was an old pic of Britney... with hair.....

Posted at 2:37PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Robin S

37. she's awesome

Posted at 2:48PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Switch

38. The article never mentioned anything about her singing ability, just that she is very pregnant. And all of you who think she is ugly, trying being that pregnant and see how hot you look.

Posted at 2:51PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Pielamby

39. 32....let me clarify.....

It can be that way with SOME women.

I just didn't think that Nicole Kidman should be picked on because she doesn't look huge. IF she gets pregnant again, I'm sure there will be a difference when she is pregnant. Not a huge fan of picking on pregnant women, mostly comparing one to another.

And yes, whoever commented, my pregnancies..."Chuck" has been my nickname since I was a baby...does that offend you somehow?

Posted at 2:52PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Chuck

40. Those are twins fo' sho.

Posted at 2:57PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Local Reporter

41. I hope she has her baby on friday- then It's birthday will be 08/08/08!!

Posted at 3:05PM on Aug 5th 2008 by tori

42. #32

PREACH SISTA, PREACH!!!!

But for real, you are totally on the money...

Posted at 3:25PM on Aug 5th 2008 by Ms Dolo D

43. This kid is going to be born in the third grade

Posted at 3:33PM on Aug 5th 2008 by gravy

44. You go Gwen! She rocks you know it!

Posted at 3:35PM on Aug 5th 2008 by peacerie

45. Hey Pulitzer - At least I don't have to pay publicists crazy amounts of money to convince stupid people like you
that Im attractive or I can sing. Its spelled OPINION and im entitled. Thank you.

Posted at 3:57PM on Aug 5th 2008 by jb