Brangie: Let's Cut Out the Baby Fat

Brad and Angie got $14 mil for pics of the twins. We got way more for our money's worth -- at $14 a pop for baby pics of TMZ users. Here's the deal: The babies are just as cute, and some even gave us the finger ... they know us so well!
Baby photos: Click to view pics!


Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 8) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. These babies are so cute but don't some of you mothers read? It said for babies up to 3 months. You should not get your money. I hate rule breakers!!

Posted at 2:22PM on Aug 9th 2008 by foxy59917

47. Better learn how to be an individualist, kid, because your mother has this major illusion that she can save the world from its problems by buying all the children and taking care of them herself. So you're not going to get much nurturing attention, you're going to be self-raising and therefore, A WINNER! Nothing worse than a pampered sissy dweeb.

Posted at 2:27PM on Aug 9th 2008 by PolarBear

48. Thanks but I don't want Brad and Angelina's link. With all the darling babies here why would you want to look any
place else. Just goes to show that the world is full of them. Good Job TMZ

Posted at 2:31PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Janet

49. Omg.. the babies 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10.. especially 10.. are NOT cute!

I think #6 really looks like Kate Hudson's son, Ryder.. cute.

#18.. is cute.. I think he's in an awkward position..? If the parents are reading this.. what was he doing?

#19 looks like the HAPPIEST baby EVER.. very cute!!

#21.. cute baby.. but I hate those headbands that parents but on their daughters heads!

#35.. cute.. I love the name!

41,42,49, 50 and 51 are all SO DARN CUTE!!

#55 should've been on the home page on tmz.. WAY TOO CUTE and the look on her face is priceless.


~sorry if my comments offended people.. but if they did.. you shouldn't submit your babies picture to a gossip website~

Posted at 2:54PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Lindsey

50. Most of these babies r older than 3 month's including the number 1 fan. Does anyone follow rules anymore?

Posted at 2:55PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Rc1265b

51. EWWW....NOT CUTE !!!

A FUTURE FATSO BY 2018

Posted at 3:08PM on Aug 9th 2008 by STOP MILKING YOUR KID WITH BON BONS, LADY

52. Who says some of these kids are more than three months old? Suri Cruise was pushing her own stroller at three months!

Posted at 3:12PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Kay

53. Some of them are really cute, but there are 3 YEAR old kids in these pics. They are supposed to be under 3 MONTHS. I sent in a legit pic of my twins under 3 MONTHS that didn't make the cut, but pics that shouldn't even be in there are.

My babies are way cuter than half these ugly bas-TARDS, and we have awards proving it. Sorry you all had to look at a bunch of ugly kids instead.

Posted at 3:33PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Producer of CUTE babies

54. Ditto on # 23.

Posted at 5:13PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Robin

55. The link worked for me just fine. Perhaps it got fixed? Anyhow, some of the babies weren't the cutest, it's true, BUT some of them were just adorable and yes just as good if not better looking than celeb kiddies. I find it interesting that they are all over the U.S. So, does TMZ have several offices throughout? And can TMZ please let us rate inappropriate comments? And what about a TMZ top 10 baby contest, that WE can vote on?

Posted at 4:02PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Teresa from Silverado

56. Oh, boy & girl, faces only a mother could love, ish

Posted at 4:04PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Mickey Mouse

57. HERE'S MY OPINION OF THE 1ST 20 BABY PHOTOS AND THE COVER PHOTO BABY.

(TO SAVE TIME i DIDN'T COMMENT BEYOND #20). BUT AS ONE BLOGGER WROTE, "DON'T SUBMIT IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH !!!

COVER BABY PHOTO - A STEP ABOVE AVERAGE, WITH A FILTHY LITTLE HABIT ALREADY. NEEDS DISCIPLINE.

#1 LESS THAN AVERAGE LOOKING -- POSSIBLY ORIENTAL.
#2 ORIENTAL, NOT CUTE, IN MY OPINION.
#3 CUTE
#4 FUTURE GAY ADULT, "I REMEMBER WHEN I WAS 3 MONTHS OLD, I USED TO STICK MY TONGUE OUT LIKE THIS. REALLY, GUYS I KNEW I WAS GAY BACK THEN." UUGGHHHHHH...
#5 FAT AND UGLY, OBESE IN 2 MORE YEARS.
#6 DAMN UGLY !! MAYBE ENTER THIS KID IN A SCIENCE CONTEST OR SOMETHING.
#7 A) HEAD IS TOO BIG, B) BLOTCHY SKIN, C) TOO FAT. ADVICE TO PARENTS -- CUT BACK TO ONLY 2 FEEDINGS A DAY.
#8 NASTY, NOT CUTE. LOOKS LIKE A TRANSGENDER TODDLER. EEEEWWWWW.
#9 DISGUSTING LOOKING. PARENTS, NEVER DO THIS AGAIN !
#10 ICKY. NO MORE, PLEASE.
#11 STRAIGHT OUT OF THE WOMB AND ONTO TMZ. SELLOUT PARENTS !
#12 NOT CUTE AT ALL. LOOKS LIKE A BIG-HEADED OLD MAN AND NO ..THE HAT DOSEN'T DISGUISE THE
BIG HEAD. OK, PERHAPS HE COULD DO A JACK IN THE BOX COMMERCIAL. (HEE, HEE).
#13 CUTE MEXICAN. BEAUTIFUL BABY.
#14 ALREADY REMINDS ME OF A PRETTY LITTLE ANNA NICOLE. (UH, OH)
#15 YIKES. I SAID YIKES! NOT EVEN POSSIBLY CUTE. NOT EVEN FROM A SIDE ANGLE.
SOMEONE CALL AN EYE DOCTOR. ARE HIS PARENTS, THE GREMLINS ??
#16 NICE FULL OF HAIR. BUT I DETECT SOME ORIENTAL IN THIS ONE.
#17 AVERAGE LOOKING. BUT HAS A JEFFREY DAHMER - ESQUE LOOK IN HIS EYES.
#18 PLAIN OLE' FASHION UGLY. TMZ MUST HAVE PICKED THIS ONE AS A BAD JOKE.
(LIKE THE BAD SINGERS THAT HAVE NO SHOT IN HELL ON AMERICAN IDOLS AUDITIONS). IS THIS A SHRUNKEN UP OLD LADY. EEEWWW!!
#19 CUTE REDHEADED BABY. (MAYBE THEY'LL GROW INTO THEIR HEAD).

AND FINALLY...

#20 THE MOST BEAUTIFUL BABY OF THE TOP 2O THAT WERE SUBMITTED. (I GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO BREED, AGAIN).

NOW, I KNOW THERE MAY BE SOME RED FACES OUT THERE RIGHT ABOUT NOW, BUT OH WELL.....HONESTY IS LIKE A BAD TASTE OF MEDICINE..SEEMS BAD NOW, BUT HELPS LATER ON.

MY OPINION TO THE PARENTS:

YOU MAY THINK YOU KIDS ARE HEALTHY,LOVABLE, FUNNY AND UNIQUE AND THEY PROBABLY ARE....

BUT ONLY ABOUT 4 OF EVERY 20 KIDS ARE ACTUALLY C-U-T-E !!!!!!!





Posted at 4:16PM on Aug 9th 2008 by SIMON COWELL S AMERICAN ALTER EGO

58. I don't understand why magazines pay all that money for baby pictures. All newborns look alike. I've made a conscious effort NOT to buy the magazines when they have these photos on the cover. I'm not into baby pimping.

Although I would like to see what comment #50's babies look like after their critique of the other kids on this site. LOL

Posted at 4:18PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

59. So much for the 3 months or younger rule... I guess the only rule was: Whites Only

Posted at 4:27PM on Aug 9th 2008 by whatever

60. To #54 Simon Cowell's alter ego. R U Serious? Funny though especially #12 and 15

Posted at 4:27PM on Aug 9th 2008 by Rex in the O .C.

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments