Hudgens Accused of Being a Big Stiff

16. Contracts made by minors are voidable by the minor. No ands ifs or buts.

Posted at 10:46AM on Aug 12th 2008 by Jeff Dranetz

17. 4. "I'm not an attorney (surprise, surprise) but I know minors can
back out of contracts and nothing can be done about it. That's why
adult co-signers are often required. I don't know anything about how
the law works in entertainment agreements or whatever it's called.
What would court approved mean? If a minor can break a contract then
that makes no difference I would think. Anyone know, can someone call
a friend or relative? Harvey Levin should answer this for all of us
fine readers."

16. "Contracts made by minors are voidable by the minor. No ands ifs or buts."


She's almost 20 years old. What the f**k are you morons talking about with this "she's a minor" bulls**t?

Posted at 2:00PM on Aug 12th 2008 by King Beef

18. I gonna see vanessa in concert in just over a week. I've been a fan since the beginng and I support her 100%

Posted at 3:06PM on Aug 12th 2008 by roxxi

19. Can't stand this girl... and it doesn't surprise me that she backs of deals and walks all over the people who made her who she is today. I hope this guy wins! Please keep us updated TMZ!!!

Posted at 3:13PM on Aug 12th 2008 by AJ

20. You're all too lazy to look up the law. If you review California contract law and the rules for minors, unless her parents were recognized as her legal guardians by the court and signed the agreement that is the only way the contract could be potentially binding. Even so, she's entitled to 100% of her money as opposed to a percentage going to her parents.
More facts are needed before a verdict can be rendered.

Posted at 3:22PM on Aug 12th 2008 by beachbound5

21. it doesnt look so real ?
i can even make one just like thatt !
lmaoo . i support vanessa !
(L)

Posted at 8:11PM on Aug 12th 2008 by STARZZ

22. Totally Agree with comment #19, i hope he wins and takes most of her cash!

Posted at 8:55PM on Aug 12th 2008 by ninalove

23. I'm surprised i havent seen a big bunch of vanessa or disney comments in here that supposedly common people write, like "she is the best i support her"; "i luv vanessa hudgens you are so beutiful" , when people actually dont think that, she is no talented and annoying, i hope this guy wins the case and she dissapears.

Posted at 8:53PM on Aug 12th 2008 by Jenna

24. No. 6 I actually copied those words straight off of the sight. TMZ must've realized their error and fixed it.

Posted at 9:46PM on Aug 12th 2008 by Maija

25. he says that she owes him 2 million of dollars but he is demanding for 5 millions OMGS this guy is a swindler..I hope that nessa can come out of this

Posted at 11:11PM on Aug 12th 2008 by Karen Marcell

26. he says that she owes him 2 million of dollars but he is demanding for 5 millions OMGS this guy is a swindler..I hope that nessa can come out of this

Posted at 11:14PM on Aug 12th 2008 by Karen Marcell

27. i dont understand it y wud she do dat vanessa is such a nice person i dont believe it 4 a second

peace out
xoxokeloxox

Posted at 3:38PM on Aug 13th 2008 by kelly

28. let me try this again.
This case is not for 5 million, but I believe 9 counts totaling 27 million, plus punitive damage....... Maybe Johny Vieira is trying to get a out of court settlement for a large sum........ But the issue is, whether Johny vieira was an "employer", or a "talent agency".... this makes a big difference. There is a contracts with minors act of 1969 and a coogans act of contracting with minors in about 1939, I believe.... not fully researched yet............BUT I also believe their is a "talent agency act" which is real important in this case....... Maybe harvey could take a look at some of the code sections and validate my points on this case, if I am capable of posting on this website.

Posted at 11:11AM on Aug 13th 2008 by TONY BAJA

29. first off she is a minor and she should be backed by the child entertainment laws that are set fup for someone that was a minor and the only reason he is going after thee 5 million is because she made the Forbes top 100 earning $5.8 million.

Give us a break Hollowood Records had the producers brought in, because Vanessa had know say on the music she sang on her first CD.
Also in May 2005 she hadn't been hired by Disney and 2nd she went on the addition recommended by another girl. She has stated that. Look at all of these people that come out of the wood work to take the money from Stars and that picture isn't a binding contract.

You know that people like this have to go after someone who is finally getting their life in order so that they can bring them down. And whose to say that he didn't have her write wait she did. Also that signature sure looks a little different then all the ones that I have seen in popstar and on pictures that she signs.

This is so wrong to do this, wait oh lets say till she is making more money so that we can go after more if she really owes him 2 milliion, then that is all she should have to pay.

Posted at 5:10AM on Aug 14th 2008 by Brenda

30. I feel sorry for this guy, it's obvious he is not doing very well to come up with a dirty little ploy like this after so long.
Sound's to me like a very desperate attempt at getting a piece of the pie that Vnnessa has made for herself with her own hard work and determination. Sure, she has had quite a bit of help over the years from many people but it is her own talent that has got her where she is now and after High School Musical she has had many projects and maybe felt she needed to move in another direction without this guy as he was obviously not right for her and her career.
Vanessa could have entered into some type of agreement but this note is definately not a written agreement of any kind. This clearly states that she is grateful for the help with her career but does not state in any way that she will return this gratitude in money. Girl's can be naive when they ae younger and write notes etc and this will be taken into concideration and I dont think that this note can be taken in any way as a written agreement of payment.

American law is very different to British law and or that reason it could go either way. This in my opinion should not even go to court as it's very silly and should be thrown out in my opinion as it's very clear what he is after in this case. It's so silly and would be treated as such in a British court of law, it seem's to me that in Ameruca these day's people can sue for just about anything, come in with next to no eveidence and they may win for no apparent reason.

I hope that the judge throws this out of court if not he will see it for what it really is, a money grabbing attempt if ever I saw one.

Vanessa has definately paid her dues in the last few year's for some naive mistakes but his guy is a leech and should be treated like one.

Posted at 10:36PM on Aug 19th 2008 by officefantastic