Celebrity Justice
Mommy Pics of Brit's Sis Trigger Criminal Probe

A stolen picture of Jamie Lynn Spears breast feeding her baby has sparked a federal child pornography investigation.

Law enforcement sources tell TMZ federal and local authorities are on the hunt for someone peddling 12 pics of Britney Spears, Jamie Lynn, daughter Maddie and baby daddy Casey Aldridge. One of the pictures shows Jamie Lynn breast feeding Maddie -- Jamie Lynn's left breast is exposed.

The pics were taken on Casey's digital camera. We're told he took the camera card to his local Wal-Mart in Louisiana for copies. Law enforcement believes someone at the Wal-Mart may have made extra copies, then tried selling them.

Because Jamie Lynn is a minor, selling the pics -- or buying them -- could constitute a violation of federal laws prohibiting child pornography. Peddling pictures of a minor's breast -- even if not taken for sexual purposes -- could land the seller and the buyer in federal prison if they are marketed across state lines for the purpose of being lurid. Also, anyone purchasing the pics could be prosecuted for the crime of receiving stolen property.

Other pics in the set include Britney holding the baby and one of Jamie Lynn, Britney, Bryan (Brit's bro), Lynne Spears and Jamie Spears around Jamie Lynn's hospital bed. There are also pics of Maddie by herself, and there's a picture of Jamie Lynn in a negligee holding the baby.

Authorities are trying to find the man who is attempting to sell the photos. In addition, we're told Britney's lawyers are thinking about going after Wal-Mart for the alleged security breach.

UPDATE: Wal-Mart tells TMZ, "We saw the story on the wires and it's news to us too. We'll of course investigate what, if anything, has happened here."

Filed under: Celebrity Justice, Britney Spears


Reader Comments

(Page 1 of 22) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

1. 1st bitches go pack!

Posted at 4:13AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by dofus

2. poor jamie lynn! so much of the spears' private lives have already been violated. breast feeding her child should definitely remain private.

Posted at 4:30AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by ASH

3. 1st

If Wal-Mart had better wages and health insurance benefits, the workers wouldn't be so sheisty!

Posted at 4:46AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Midnight Drunk

4. child porn? Hell shes old enough to crap out a kid...plus is'nt "baby dady" an adult?
perhaps they should hit him up with some statutory charge...lol!

Posted at 5:12AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Oleg

5. give me a break. since when did any of the spears broads ever try to hide their boobs. child porn my ass!

Posted at 5:16AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by jesus

6. Is anyone here noticing the obvious? They were taken on a DIGITAL camera! WTF are they doing taking those to Wal-Mart for copies when they can do it themselves on a PC?

I think what's criminal is her utter lack of common sense, (I know, we are talking about a Spears sibling here, but still) The stupid clueless trailer queen really has no common sense. I mean none. Am I the only one who doesn't feel sorry for her?

MAKE ME A STAR!! MAKE ME A STAR !!! Then later, 'Please leave me alone!"

I truly wish the Spears girls were as barren as the desert, then we wouldn't have to put up with a whole 'nother generation of idiots like these 2 geniuses...and their pathetic mom.

Posted at 5:19AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Chaz

7. so its Casey's digital camera,,,So HE shot the PORNO PICTURES,,,HE SHOULD BE ARRESTED ,HE IS THE OWNER OF THESE PORNO PICTURES,,
Casey's digital camera

Casey's digital camera

Casey's digital camera

Casey's digital camera

Casey's digital camera

Posted at 5:32AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Bob

8. she looks like she's the biggest bitch. feel sorry for baby daddy.he's in for a ride.

Posted at 5:35AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by KDIZZLL

9. Mommy Spears must be made she can't sell the pics, or write another book. These kids having been spreading them for some time.

Posted at 6:22AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Well Mom can't cash in

10. At the most if the pictures turn out to be stolen then maybe some
privacy issues, to classify breast feeding as porn is so stupid,
breast feeding rights activists are fighting exactly that sort of
mentality... now it's going to be used as an excuse to go after
someone. I'm with the poster who said, she was old enough to have a child,
she was old enough to have sex with and live with an adult while still a minor and that was all honkey
dorey... breast feeding is what breasts are for, next time if you are
taking personal pictures of that nature don't take them to Walmart
fools.. not like they can't afford a picture printer for the home computer
I'd think...sheesh

Posted at 6:27AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Hello Kitty

11. Buy a printer you dumbasses! LOL! How many gazillions of $$$ is your family worth?????

WalMart, LOL....Redneck Macy's

Posted at 6:39AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by LOL

12. So Casey goes to WallMart to get DIGITAL pictures processed. He should marry into this family. He's an honorary member already.

Posted at 6:56AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by britbritisaskank

13. MCain-Palin 08!

Posted at 7:10AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Anti-Satan

14. People, leave the Spears sisters alone. I have a digital camera, I have a computer and printer and I go to Walmart to develop them! Better quality pics. My question is how did someone get a copy, unless the machine saves pictures. I feel sorry for these two girls. Nobody can say anything nice about them. Also why the trailer trash comments? The Spears lived in a house, Jamie worked, Lynne worked........how is that trailer trash. Maybe they are from the south

Posted at 7:16AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Baby

15. Hey Number 13! Leave Roman Polanski out of this DO YOU HEAR ME! Or you may end up like is first wife and son!You must be a lonely person to bring up his name in this situation. I agree with all of the other posters except YOURS! Is YOUR Mommie and daddy former "Family" members? Just leave Mr. Polanski out of this, his wife suffered so bad and you only invoke evil.As for Jaime Lynn and Casey and the baby, well can you say No to Celebrity to the baby, not even a month old and caught suckling on her momma's teets.Seriously, if I had the opportunity to process those pics considering the state of the economy, Ida done it too.As for the child porn charges, well a baby suckling on it's momma's breast is NOT porn, it is perfectly normal.The public never sees this so to eveyone, it's porn because their call it porn. Casey's dumb dumb azz actually brought them to a wal-mart?! HA? He probably sold her out!!! At least she is breastfeeing.Number 13's momma probably gave him/her booze in a bottle!

Posted at 7:18AM on Sep 22nd 2008 by Philly Chick

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments