Britney to Prosecutor: I Ain't No Krimin'l, Y'all

31. Spears again proves she's a complete moron and is now going to spend tens of thousands more to try to disprove it using shark lawyers who probably charge about that fine per hour, or more!

Posted at 5:36PM on Oct 8th 2008 by Idiot clogging the courts

32. Britney is too mentally ill to stand trial. Just look into her eyes in photos and you see that she is not rational. The girl is just flat crazy and never will be the same as the old Britney!!!

Posted at 6:25PM on Oct 8th 2008 by Earl

33. Holy Crap,,,just saw Britney hangin all over WEC Champ Urijah Faber,,,,poor guy!!!

Posted at 6:49PM on Oct 8th 2008 by Roger Dean

34. The court order is so wrong to put Britney on this charge. It's rediculous that this still goes on. She just had to pay a fine but why are they making her do probation for? after a long battle with her mental issue and finally gotback to be normal and the stupid court won't even let her off that charge? not even a charge if thats what they call it cause all it is was just a driver license issue. I can see that the court just want to make most celebrity life miserable and to bring them down .Britney was sure to be one of the victim. Thats not justice. What is important now is that Britney Spear .....one of the greatest celebrity ....our star and entertainer should be just let off with out a charge , no case, no trial needed cause all that is just the past now. Let the new Britney Spear continue on her carreer now !!!!! let her live happyier and free with her kids, family, and to work peacefully on her new music album. We are anxcious to see more from her. She is great!!

Posted at 8:36PM on Oct 8th 2008 by soda&energydrink

35. So you're saying that the court should give her special treatment because she has created on going legal nightmares for herself and this should give her a pass on any further legal issues? Ummm.....that's just idiotic!

Posted at 9:26PM on Oct 8th 2008 by Idiot clogging the courts

36. Womanizer .... cool.

Posted at 10:05PM on Oct 8th 2008 by Huh?

37. One year probation? What a joke. A fine, yes. Probation, no.

Posted at 10:05PM on Oct 8th 2008 by Huh?

38. REALLY!!!BRITNEY HAS NO BUISNESS BEHIND THE WHEEL OF A CAR. JUST BECAUSE SHE HAD SEVERAL DOSNT MEAN SHE SHOULD DRIVE THEM. EVERYONE TAKES FOR GRANTED THEIR LICENSES INCLUDING BRITNEY. AFTER THEY FINE HER AND TAKE AWAY HER DRIVING PRIVLIGLES,GIVE HER PROBATION, SHE NEEDS SOME CAL TRANS HOURS WITH A BUNCH OF MEXICANS ON THE SIDE OF THE 405!!!!!!! I AM AMAZED THAT WITH HER BI POLAR MEDS RACING AROUND IN HER BLOOD STREAM SHE HASNT RUN DOWN A FAMILY GOING TO TEMPLE AT SUNDOWN....

Posted at 10:28PM on Oct 8th 2008 by LOU REEDl

39. Man, the prosecutors in California be trippin'. They are waste so much money on sending people to court over bogus charges.

Posted at 8:11PM on Oct 16th 2008 by Harris

40. In what world does a misdemeanor traffic citation get tried in criminal court??

Not the real one, hence the reason I can prove that nearly everything about this woman in the media is staged because it generates her millions in revenue without having to work, By law, no tabloid can use her likeness or image without her expressed permission because what they published is not deemed as news worthy under the freedom of the press.

In other words, the paparazzi you all believe harass her actually work for her, get a percentage of those pics and the bulk of the profit goes in her pocket, For starters, court costs alone in Los Angeles are going to be easily $150, the fine for hitting a car and driving without a license is going to be about triple that. As far as probation goes, it generally takes quite a bit more than a traffic misdemeanor like this to get put on probation and as I already mentioned, she's being tried in a municipal traffic court, not criminal court, there's a HUGE difference.

Hey but you saw it on TV and read it everywhere so surely it's true huh...ya bunch of idiots.

Posted at 12:32AM on Oct 9th 2008 by JonDeath

41. I don't get it. If she gets probation doesn't that mean she can't leave the state of California? Doesn't she have a world tour planned? Can't really do that when you're on probation. Who knows, I may be wrong but maybe that's why Britney rejected the plea deal.

Posted at 8:13AM on Oct 9th 2008 by Ah..

42. I just checked FindLaw, and it's not just a license problem. This is part of the action against Britney for the hit-and-run she committed while not having a valid California license. She had a private agreement with the owner of the car about payment for damages, but that apparently is not sufficient to get rid of it all. The judge said that in similar cases, he had never agreed to reduce the charge from misdemeanor to infraction. So it doesn't really sound as though she is being singled out - she just isn't getting special treatment from either the judge or the prosecutor (who also says the procedure is the same for others with the same situation).

When comparing cases, you have to include the hit-and-run aspect, not just the invalid license issue. If she hadn't hit and run, she wouldn't be in more trouble now. When damage is involved, that also typically makes the action more serious in the eyes of the law. I think that's all that's happening here. The conservatorship just delayed things.. But the misdemeanor charge is sticking - as it would for a non-celebrity.

It really seems more like her attorney is prolonging the agony to get more money out of her. He said he isn't going to do anything to defend against the charge, but will just sit there and then drag it through appeals. What a waste of the court's time and Britney's money... Britney doesn't care, she doesn't even have to show up in court for a misdemeanor.

Posted at 10:51PM on Oct 9th 2008 by jwoolman

43. Let the Prosecutor do his job! The only reason why this has gone for so long cos Brit is a total wack job. Thats why she doesnt have her kids in her care. And whats so hard paying a fine that is ONLY $150 and being on probation?

Posted at 11:10PM on Oct 12th 2008 by Chezii