Diddy's Kids -- Chippendales Rescue Rangers

16. Im sorry everyone but I don't get it. Why in the hell with all the pedophiles, perverts, and the rest in this world. Why would u want your babies on mag spread naked except for a bow tie regarless if they were boys this wrong and sick. Damn Kim quit trying to get so much money and mother and protect your kids.

Posted at 2:59PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Melissa

17. Even wrong for TMZ to show on the website. Stay away from half-naked kids, please.

Posted at 3:04PM on Oct 25th 2008 by chicken stripper

18. To: Yeah, I said it


There is a HUGE difference between running around the house in a diaper and being on a magazine cover for the world to see. 99% of the children I see out and about are FULLY clothed, not in a diaper and bow tie.

Face it, he's a pompous, arrogant pr*ck that feels, for some reason, he needs to pimp his half naked little girls. In the years that he's be in the industry he's gone crazy. He needs to do the world a favor and become a recluse.

Posted at 3:05PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Umm

19. What the hell! Put some clothes on them!

Posted at 3:10PM on Oct 25th 2008 by VAgirl

20. Love you Diddy but these babies need shirts. They are little girls not boys

Posted at 3:11PM on Oct 25th 2008 by shebakescheesecakes.com

21. I wonder what the girls will think when they grow up and see this picture.

Posted at 3:14PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Allison

22. they don't look like very happy children

Posted at 3:19PM on Oct 25th 2008 by the way I see it

23. L*O*S*E*R

Posted at 3:19PM on Oct 25th 2008 by I AM a hater

24. #8 by "Yeah, I said it" - I will tell you why most people think this is just oh so wrong on multiple levels!

First off - we don't even know if the babies are wearing diapers cuz I certainly can't tell from the photo. Secondly, Diddy has that look on his face like "I want to sex you up" which is so not appropriate with those twin girls right there. If the photographer was going for the look that dads can be sexy too, I'm afraid they didn't quite make the grade on this one. And, thirdly, what is up with the bowtie? Generally speaking, nakedness topped off with a bowtie = SEXY photo! Babies don't wear bowties - certainly not little girls! The whole premise behind this photo is for it to say "Sexy". That is sooooo not appropriate with babies - it comes off as perverted and classless.

And, my little girl always had a shirt on when she ran around in her diaper. To this day, she is extremely modest and I'm not one bit afraid she will end up on a DVD of "Girls Gone Wild". You have to start young because society will certainly try to start at an early age also.

Posted at 3:23PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Clothe those babies

25. Old show;"I want to work for Diddy".......18 YEARS LATER......New Show; "Diddy Girls Pimpin' for Daddy".

Posted at 3:27PM on Oct 25th 2008 by justanotherfknday

26. THERES NOTHING WRONG WITH DIDDY TAKING A NICE PIC WITH HIS GIRLS!!!
ITS ONLY PERVERTED TO THOSE THINKING THAT WAY!!!

Posted at 3:26PM on Oct 25th 2008 by STACIA

27. This is just disturbing......he has been wack lately to begin with, but this definately puts him over the top

Posted at 3:26PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Not a fan

28. THERES MORE PERVERTED STUFF ON T.V. WHAT THE HELL ITS HIS KIDS
LIKE YOUR PARENTS NEVER TOOK PICTURES OF YOU IN THE BATHTUB COME ON PEOPLE
IF ITS PERVY TO YOU THEN GET YOUR MIND OUT OF THE GUTTER GEEEEZZZZZ.

Posted at 3:29PM on Oct 25th 2008 by STACIA

29. ah NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! weirdo

Posted at 3:38PM on Oct 25th 2008 by janet

30. This is just wrong and disgusting. Those girls are still babies. The only people that need to see them naked are the people who change their diapers. I can take a lot of crap from celebrities, but when they start whoring out their own children, it just makes my stomach turn. What a creep.

Posted at 3:57PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Nobody In Particular