Diddy's Kids -- Chippendales Rescue Rangers

31. They are not in diapers, they are nude, no bottoms. only newborns should be photographed nude and even then you have to be careful. Diddy is so masaginistic. He was having sex with Cassie underaged. He is sick and its all about him and he's obviously an idiot if he did not see a problem here and I am sure he will validate it on his video blog.

Posted at 3:57PM on Oct 25th 2008 by come on

32. Low class, ignorant fool.

Posted at 3:59PM on Oct 25th 2008 by IApproveThisMsg

33. Is he related to Michael Jackson? Same taste as Michael

Posted at 4:01PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Confused

34. Throw them some peanuts! What a whack job that Diddy is!

Posted at 4:02PM on Oct 25th 2008 by hmm

35. What the hell is wrong with that man? Y would anyone do that to his kids, GIRLS? That moron is sick...

Posted at 4:09PM on Oct 25th 2008 by sds

36. Didddy strikes me as the kind of person who likes to "prove his manhood" by fathering numerous children by multiple women. The girls are beautiful, though.

Posted at 4:14PM on Oct 25th 2008 by monique

37. Also, he should know better than to put his little girls out there like that with no clothes on. Their mother, Kim, must not have any backbone. That request should have automatically been met with a hell no!

Posted at 4:14PM on Oct 25th 2008 by monique

38. THIS GUY WOULD SELL HIS MOTHER OUT. IT'S BEEN PROVEN THAT HE WOULD SELL HIS CHILDREN WITH THIS PHOTE. I REPEAT WHAT SOMEONE ABOVE SAID. HE IS EVERYTHING AND MORE OF WHAT'S WRONG WITH BLACK MALES.

Posted at 5:33PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Mickey

39. 24. THERES NOTHING WRONG WITH DIDDY TAKING A NICE PIC WITH HIS GIRLS!!!
ITS ONLY PERVERTED TO THOSE THINKING THAT WAY!!!

Posted at 3:26PM on Oct 25th 2008 by STACIA
-------------------------------------

I agree, tmz said chippendales and the crowd runs all over that... lol

not a thing wrong with these pics at all, nothing at all

Posted at 4:12PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Adrienne

40. This picture disturbs me. These girls should have on a type of top. They are not 1-8 months old. Kim, what were you thinking. Notice how one girl has her hand between the other girl's legs?

Posted at 8:58AM on Oct 26th 2008 by Jack

41. What a hood! If you can't tell the difference between right and wrong moron, don't have kids!

Posted at 4:18PM on Oct 25th 2008 by imjustsayin

42. These days we got to protect our kids at all cost. Exposing them naked with bowties reminds me of Bamboozled. Blackface, anything to please Massa!!!! Boys will grow to Men and we want out little girls to grow into Queens... Wake up my peoples!!!

Posted at 5:02PM on Oct 25th 2008 by kevmac

43. So this is what happens when stars get bored and don't know what to do with their time. I truly love Diddy and all that he does but this is not so good. Poor babies! And why the hell did Kim Porter allow this????

Posted at 4:27PM on Oct 25th 2008 by hunnie33

44. A few months ago there was a local trial regarding the use of using kids (some as young as 5 and 6) as the primary dancers and performers at a stripper/sex club..

Even the scintilla of a hint of using BABIES and TODDLERS to elicit a sexual arousal out of an adult is criminal and a definition of child abuse in the gravest sense, imo.

Posted at 4:31PM on Oct 25th 2008 by chicken stripper

45. Why is everyone surprised. This just goes along with P-funk Diddy's whole image.... just plain TACKY. Someone like him who claims to know the "finer" things in life. Really doesn't get it.

Posted at 4:37PM on Oct 25th 2008 by here we go