Diddy's Kids -- Chippendales Rescue Rangers

46. This is way wrong. Maybe if it was a family baby picture, taking it would be acceptable, but still wrong. But putting it in a magazine, were millions of pedophiles can see it. What is wrong with this guy?

Posted at 4:42PM on Oct 25th 2008 by TJ

47. In 18 years, Diddy will be recreating this same photo with his daughters on the cover of Playboy.

Posted at 4:45PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Just My Two Cents

48. Had they been male, this would have been cute. However, since they are female, right, it is just awkward. Girls who wear bow ties are usually sexy strippers, bunny waitresses or live at the Playboy Mansion. A little elastic headband that with roses that infants would have been cute. The wardrobe person should have rethought this. The father should have had better taste when it came to dressing his daughters. Hopefully we won't see them dressed like this again when they are 18!

Posted at 4:49PM on Oct 25th 2008 by LA Today

49. So are his babies replacing D-Woods & Audrey in Dip-stickity Cane? GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD I don't ask for much but make this jack ass go away. P stands for Pimp my daughters out.

Posted at 4:52PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Such a shame! :(

50. A pediphile's dream.......you know and I know that he just loves his kids, but what was he thinking? Very poor taste and even poorer taste to publish in a well known magazine.

Posted at 4:52PM on Oct 25th 2008 by YankeeFan

51. That's just creepy

Posted at 4:54PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Uhhhhhhhhh

52. It’s scary how pretty much anyone with a uterus can have a baby. If you were so inclined there’s nothing stopping you dressing your mini-me like a cheap hooker. It’s probably a good thing Britney has only had boys so far, because if she’d had a little lady you can be assured it would have the entire range of ‘Heelarious First High Heels’. Choose from hot pink, leopard skin, zebra and more!

Posted at 5:10PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Heelarious First High Heels

53. If a naked child or baby bothers you, then...guess what? YOU'RE the one thinking weird thoughts about it!!

Posted at 5:10PM on Oct 25th 2008 by bc

54. Folks got some serious hangups here.. they're naked babies, so what? Be nice if Diddy could smile, though.

Posted at 5:14PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Julio

55. So the father is an idiot, where is the mother? Can you say therapy?

Posted at 6:55PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Denise

56. He is such trash

Posted at 5:22PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Anonymous

57. The reason it is a big deal is because of the perverts out there who don't think it is a big deal love to look at little kids with lust not owwww. I can't believe he did this... like he is saying looks at my girls everyone... He doesn't look like a Father he looks like a pimp.

Posted at 5:27PM on Oct 25th 2008 by southernb

58. Completely agree with #3!!!!

He's really obnoxious

Posted at 5:33PM on Oct 25th 2008 by Marty? Is that you?

59. He clearly is surrounded by too many "Yes" people. Someone needs to stand up and say, WTF. That is ridiculous. That looks like the definition of pimping out your kids. Not cute.

Posted at 6:39PM on Oct 25th 2008 by ick

60. People need to grow up. His daughters are BABIES - since when is there anything remotely sexual about babies not wearing clothes? The fact that people start thinking about sexual/adult connotations about a baby picture is sickening.

Posted at 5:49PM on Oct 25th 2008 by get real