Report: Julian's Body Covered, Hidden

Julian King's body was covered with a curtain, which may explain why it took three days for authorities to find, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

Additionally, sources tell the paper Jennifer Hudson's brother Jason was shot in the leg before he was killed on Friday. It was unclear how he got the wound and how it factored into his murder.

A public memorial is scheduled for Sunday at the Pleasant Gift Memorial Baptist Church in Chicago. The ceremony will be private from 3-4:00 PM and then it will be open to the public.



Reader Comments

(Page 4 of 14) Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

46. joker is right. We should set up a conference call!! Or step away from the computer!

Thanks for the info southside. Do you think it's odd that it took so long to find the car? Would it have stood out? I know people think this is suspicious, but I'm not sure why.

The vehicle had the license plates intact so do you think someone would have put it together sooner?

Like I said, I don't the area at all.

Posted at 8:54PM on Oct 31st 2008 by mindy

47. I'm black, but I don't understand why people keep referring to Julian as a "baby". He was way past baby age--he was a little boy for Christ's sake!

Posted at 8:59PM on Oct 31st 2008 by Alicia

48. 45. It WAS Julia who found the bodies, sweety.
Everyother Magazine / some news are now starting to report this. US Magazine has HER.....
MAGAZINES???????
I'll pick up a copy of THE STAR tonight and check it out...
FYI- You're not the only one following this case. Others just have the decency to refrain from pointing fingers, casting judgment and speculating.

Posted at 9:00PM on Oct 31st 2008 by dumb and dumber

49. A lot of times, it dosen't take a cop, detective or rocket scientist to see the loop-holes in some of the stories that these KILLERS come up with. Nobody kills three members in ONE FAMILY FOR NOTHING.

And as far as news sources; like someone above wrote; do your own damn research. I KNOW WHENEVER I BLOG, I CHECK RESOURCES FIRST.

AND, might I add, TMZ HAS YET TO BE WRONG ABOUT WHAT THEY'VE BEEN REPORTING ON THIS CASE!!!

Funny how THEY were the ones who broke the news on the raid that took place at the house on March 4, 2002. The Chicago Sun-Times / Tribune didn't let that out until it was leaked by TMZ.

Hmmmmm. I wonder why.

Posted at 9:01PM on Oct 31st 2008 by MissBlaze43

50. @ dumb

That's where you're wrong again, sweety. A lot of Jennifer's fans ARE following this case. The same way you would be following it if it were Angelina Jolie that this happened to.

NEXT!!!!

Posted at 9:04PM on Oct 31st 2008 by MissBlaze43

51. Hey dumb and dumber - here is just one of the many links out there. so sad that I have to do the research for you. Stop being lazy.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=653732

Scroll down - it clearly states, and I quote "Hudson's older sister, Julia, discovered the bodies around 3:00 pm Friday but there was no sign of her son."

Please do your own research before you accuse others of not knowing what they are talking about.

Posted at 9:05PM on Oct 31st 2008 by Okie Doke

52. This is a time where no fingers should be pointed. Can't anyone at least give this family (what is left of the family) at least a week to let it set in that three of their loved ones were murdered in cold blood? Think about if it happened to you (yeah, something nobody wants to think about or ever thinks they'll have to deal with) .. put yourself in their shoes. Lay off blaming people for now.. really.. I mean, a freaking 7 year old was murdered. Isn't that f*cked up enough for you guys? Let the FBI do the investigating and charging. If you were that smart that you knew what was going on better than anyone else, you'd either be the murderer yourself, an accomplice, or a member of the FBI... if you're not any of those, lay the f*ck off.

Posted at 9:27PM on Oct 31st 2008 by UptownGirl

53. Julia disgusts me. How can a mother make a stepfather out of a man that spent 7 yrs in prison for attempted murder? A mother's job is protect her child, not put the child in harms way by associating with violent criminals. I don't understand how anyone can defend her actions. Now she will have to live with the fact that she brought this man into her son's life and it cost him his life.

Posted at 9:58PM on Oct 31st 2008 by AnotherAnon

54. #50. A lot of times, it dosen't take a cop, detective or rocket scientist to see the loop-holes in some of the stories that these KILLERS come up with. Nobody kills three members in ONE FAMILY FOR NOTHING.
True, I'll agree, there are loop-holes. However, the cops and detectives have a lot more information then we do. We have no right to convict or accuse anyone without knowing the whole story.

Posted at 9:14PM on Oct 31st 2008 by dumb and dumber

55. Missblaze:

You are correct that it doesn't take a rocket scientist to spot some issues. But you seem to be under the impression that the public has been given all of the relevant information, and the authorities are missing a lot.

That may or may not be true, we just don't know. That's why it's called speculation. The police department and district attorney are not making a lot of information public. They shouldn't. Whoever is ultimately charged deserves a fair trial and public interest in this is high.

Family members have spoken, but surely you can see that they can't come from a place of objectivityl On any side. This is fine, I would have a hard time being objective is one of these people were a loved one.

I was asking for links because you seem angry that some people disagree. There are conflicting reports out there and people base their opinion on the stories they have read themselves.

Posted at 9:17PM on Oct 31st 2008 by mindy

56. #51 The same way you would be following it if it were Angelina Jolie that this happened to.

your point is?

Posted at 9:18PM on Oct 31st 2008 by dumb and dumber

57. Who cares what links say,. They could be wrong. Until that cheif of police has a conference and says things (Julia fund 1st) that is when I'll believe it. TMZ COULD be wrong, there is a 1st time for everything.

As for bystander......bastard, whatever, who in the hell are you?? this is all gossip bloggin if you don't like it just the F*** out!
As for calling Julian a baby, I'm sure it was a term of endearment. We all know he's a little boy.

GEEZ, a lot of you are taking this TOO litteral and need to chill. NO ONE KNOWS ANYTHING but what we read. AGAIN, until that chief calls it, NO ONE KNOWS.

BUT I DO KNOW William and his bud(s) were involved. Julian's dad and Julia know something and Jason died knowing something too. Heck, Jennifer may know something.

Michelle - chills wiht the CAPS. If people don't like what gong on here, long comments, etc. get the F***OUT!!

VOTE OBAMA - Peace----------

Posted at 9:30PM on Oct 31st 2008 by REAL

58. 48. I'm black, but I don't understand why people keep referring to Julian as a "baby". He was way past baby age--he was a little boy for Christ's sake!

Posted at 8:59PM on Oct 31st 2008 by Alicia
----------------------------------------
He was a little boy, but people think of him as a baby because he should have been protected, and some because they see a 7 year old as a baby. I am 47 and still my mom's baby :)

Posted at 9:22PM on Oct 31st 2008 by Adrienne

59. @ Dumb

You're right. But let me tell you what I DO know:

1) Bringing known felons around your child is a HUGE no-no. Granted, it probably wouldn't have made a difference since her and some family members already have that 'hood mentality' and were already involved in that 'life'style.

2) This is why I feel that Julia knows more than what she's saying - WAIT, YOU'LL SEE!!

Posted at 9:35PM on Oct 31st 2008 by MissBlaze43

60. Missblaze

You and I will be doing the I told ya so dance, Julia is involved

Posted at 9:24PM on Oct 31st 2008 by Adrienne

Previous 15 Comments | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments