Hudson Victim -- Murdered by His Own Gun?

Jason HudsonOne of the victims in the Hudson murder case could have been shot to death by his own weapon.

Jennifer Hudson's brother Jason owned a gun that may have been identical to the murder weapon, according to law enforcement sources and neighbors who spoke with the Chicago Tribune.

According to those sources, Jason said the gun had been stolen from the family home -- the crime scene -- a few months ago.

Law enforcement sources are now investigating whether the gun used in the Hudson triple murders once belonged to Jason Hudson.

Jason's brother-in-law, William Balfour is the suspect in the case.



Reader Comments

(Page 5 of 10) Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments

61. I still think that Julia knows information and she is not spilling. There is no way that she doesn't know whats going on. Even if she didn't physically do anything, she knows more than she's telling. And that still makes her guilty as sin. What a fabulous mother she was. Ugh.

Posted at 7:01PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by cheerios and milk

62. From ET Online:

Friends and Family Remember Hudson's Slain Relatives

"A memorial service was held today to pay tribute to Jennifer Hudson's late mother, brother and nephew.

Friends and family gathered at Pleasant Gift Memorial Baptist Church in Chicago's South Side to listen to spiritual songs and reminisce about Hudson's relatives, The Associated Press reports.

Family members took turns telling stories about the three victims. Jennifer and her sister, Julia, did not attend the memorial service.

A private funeral service is to be held tomorrow for Hudson's mother, brother and nephew who were shot to death late last month. "

http://www.etonline.com/news/2008/11/67233/

Posted at 7:04PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Dave

63. Julia is not innocent in this by all means. She knows what's up. Her story doesn't hold up very well. An honest, innocent person wouldnt have such a weak story. What are you hiding Julia??

Posted at 7:04PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Jillian

64. I have read a lot of posts around the internet by people asking why the CPD haven't moved faster on charging someone. My thoughts are: They have mentioned they have several "people of interest" in their sights (although no names have been given other than Balfour's) - and I figure perhaps they are watching certain individuals for their reactions during the memorial/funeral. Those moments are often quite telling to people trained to know what to look for. ;)

There is always so much the public doesn't know (even though we are all curious and want answers), and I suppose this is to keep the general public as unbiased as possible for when the trial eventually happens. Not to mention - the CPD is in the spotlight big time with this case and they want to make sure they do everything as by-the-book as possible.

It's going to be interesting to see how things unfold over the next few weeks.

How long can they hold Balfour on his infraction? If they had the evidence to charge him - would they not have done so already? Or are they just waiting for the funerals to be over?

Posted at 7:08PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Hayley_B

65. #65 Dave,
Thanks for posting that. I cant believe she didnt attend! She cant attend that but she goes on myspace everyday?!?!!! What the hell is going on with this woman? She is so f@cking shady.

Posted at 7:08PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Patricia M.

66. I STILL THINK JULIA HAS A HAND IN THIS SOMEHOW. SHE'S NOT INNOCENT....NOFR EAKIN WAY. AND IF SHE WAS INVOLVED, IT WILL COME OUT SOON ENOUGH.
KEEP GETTING ON MYSPACE JULIA WHILE YOU CAN....CUZ SOON SH!T MY HIT THE FAN!!

Posted at 7:12PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by SBOOTARFIES

67. julia your time is almost up sweetheart. tick tock tick tock.

Posted at 7:15PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by sock

68. im still suspicious of julia hudson. there hasn't been anything to make me think she is in the clear. it would be horrible to think she is involved in killing her family. i pray to god that its not the truth, but i think it may actually be.

Posted at 7:19PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by jelly

69. come on this julia character is gettin on my nerves! the jig is up lady! soon everyone will know what is really up wit you. she guilty for sure. something just aint right here. so sad so sad.

Posted at 7:24PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Marie

70. Why didn't Julia Hudson attend the memorial if other family members were there???? Weird.

Posted at 7:26PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by general tao chicken

71. damn what a family. pathetic.

Posted at 7:28PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by buttchucks

72. #67 I cant believe she didnt attend! She cant attend that but she goes on myspace everyday?!?!!! What the hell is going on with this woman? She is so f@cking shady.
Posted at 7:08PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Patricia M.

Jennifer and Julia never planned on attending this service. A private service will be held for the family.

#68 There is always so much the public doesn't know (even though we are all curious and want answers), and I suppose this is to keep the general public as unbiased as possible for when the trial eventually happens. Not to mention - the CPD is in the spotlight big time with this case and they want to make sure they do everything as by-the-book as possible.
Posted at 7:08PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by Hayley_B

I agree, there are reason's we don't know all the facts. It's unfortunate people are so determined to cast judgment based on what has been reported thus far.....and that's even been twisted.
We need to let CPD do their job, they will release facts on a need-to-know-basis!!

Posted at 7:31PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by waiting for the truth

73. Hayley:

Balfour is being held on a parole violation so they can keep him until that hearing, which is still over a week away I think. Once you're arrested, they only have a couple of days to charge you. So this works in the cops' favor. He gets a lawyer for his parole hearing, but if it's a public defender, they'll spend about 30 minutes on that. He's stopped cooperating, so as long as they stop questioning him, he doesn't necessarily get council.

It could be they are waiting for the funeral. They could also just be waiting for someone to slip up and talk to someone etc.... I think it's a good strategy, as most criminals aren't that bright.

I have a suspicion that plenty of people are talking and the CPD just isn't releasing any of it.

Posted at 7:33PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by mindy

74. Wow. I don't blame Julia or Jennifer for not attending. They will have their own private service.

There is huge public interest, so I think it was very nice of them to schedule something public.

Posted at 7:36PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by mindy

75. Hopefully the pot of beans will spill eventually. I would be surprised if Julia is not involved in this somehow but time will tell (other than guilt by association).

A lot of people (including myself) are the same saying that Howard K. Sterns was somehow involved in the death of Anna Nicole Smith's son and looked what happened there, nothing!

Posted at 7:58PM on Nov 2nd 2008 by antbabs

Previous 15 Comments | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Most Recent | Next 15 Comments